Minimum Local Anesthetic Dose for Adductor Canal Block
Minimum Effective Local Anesthetic Dose for Adductor Canal Block for Knee Analgesia - a Preliminary Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the minimum dose of ropivacaine 0.5%, required to produce pain relief without weakening the leg muscles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2018
CompletedFebruary 12, 2018
February 1, 2018
1.9 years
January 26, 2018
February 8, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TES)
To determine the minimum effective dose of ropivacaine in the adductor canal block to initiate sensory analgesia in the knee. Complete sensory anesthesia in the knee following adductor canal block 30 minutes after ropivacaine administration.
30 min after ropivacaine injection
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The degree of motor block following ropivacaine administration
Assessments will start at baseline before ropivacaine injection and every 5 minutes after ropivacaine injection until 45 minutes have passed or until surgery commences, whichever comes first
Cold sensation
30 min after ropivacaine injection
Other Outcomes (1)
Total opioid consumption
48 hours
Study Arms (1)
Minimum Effective dose
EXPERIMENTALLocal anesthetic Ropivacaine 0.5% injection for adductor canal block
Interventions
The volume of local anesthetic Ropivacaine 0.5% will be determined by the response (success or failure of block, 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection) of the previous patient in that group. Block success is defined as an absence of ice sensation in the knee within 30 min of ropivacaine administration accompanied by tolerance to tetanic electrical stimulation (TES) at 60 mA(milliamp) for 5 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists)physical status classification system I-III
- years of age, inclusive
- BMI 18 - 40
- Scheduled for elective total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability or refusal to provide informed consent
- Any contraindication to regional anesthesia (allergy to local anesthetics, bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection at the site of block)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Related Publications (5)
Krombach J, Gray AT. Sonography for saphenous nerve block near the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):369-70. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.006. No abstract available.
PMID: 17720129BACKGROUNDCasati A, Baciarello M, Di Cianni S, Danelli G, De Marco G, Leone S, Rossi M, Fanelli G. Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):823-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem100. Epub 2007 May 3.
PMID: 17478453BACKGROUNDDanelli G, Ghisi D, Fanelli A, Ortu A, Moschini E, Berti M, Ziegler S, Fanelli G. The effects of ultrasound guidance and neurostimulation on the minimum effective anesthetic volume of mepivacaine 1.5% required to block the sciatic nerve using the subgluteal approach. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1674-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b92372.
PMID: 19843807BACKGROUNDDavis JJ, Bond TS, Swenson JD. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):618-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181bfbf00. No abstract available.
PMID: 19901788BACKGROUNDManickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84.
PMID: 19916251BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vincent WS Chan, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
- STUDY CHAIR
Richard Brull, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
- STUDY CHAIR
Ki Jinn Chin, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
- STUDY CHAIR
Anahi Perlas, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2018
First Posted
February 9, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 5, 2014
Study Completion
August 5, 2014
Last Updated
February 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02