Sugammadex Provide Better Surgical Condition Compared With Neostigmine in Laryngeal Microsurgery.
Comparison Sugammadex With Neostigmine in Laryngeal Microsurgery.
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to make a comparison of surgical condition and recovery time between rocuronium 0.45 mg/kg and neostigmine group and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and sugammadex group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 17, 2017
CompletedApril 17, 2017
July 1, 2015
1.3 years
December 9, 2014
December 15, 2016
March 2, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Laryngoscopic Score
Definitions for evaluation of Laryngoscopycondition. : Easy = jaw relaxed, no resistance to blade insertion, fair = jaw not fully relaxed, slight resistance to blade insertion, difficult = poor jaw relaxation, active resistance of the patient to laryngoscopy. Variables Excellent Good Poor
At the beginning of surgery, the surgeon rated the laryngoscopy condition
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Recovery Time From Neuromuscular Blockade
from the injection of neostigmine or sugammadex up to 30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
rocuronium 0.45 - neostigmine
ACTIVE COMPARATORwhen anesthetic induction, inrocuronium 0.45 mg/kg will be administered for muscle relaxation. When the end of operation, a injection of neostigmine or sugammadex will be administered.
rocuronium 0.9 - sugammadex
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhen anesthetic induction, rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg will be injected to rocuronium 0.9 - sugammadex group for muscle relaxation. When the end of operation,, a injection of neostigmine or sugammadex be administered.
Interventions
At anesthetic induction, rocuronium 0.45 to rocuronium 0.45 - neostigmine group or rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg to rocuronium 0.9 - sugammadex group will be injected for muscle relaxation. During surgical procedure, we will monitor train of four (TOF) using nerve stimulator. After operation, neostigmine 50 mcg/kg or sugammadex 4 mg/kgl be injected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status classification 1 or 2 elective laryngeal microsurgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- BMI \>25 or \< 20 kg/m2 Patients taking intercurrent medication Glutamic Oxalacetate Transaminase or Glutamic Pyruvate Transaminase \> 40 IU/L, Cr \> 1.4 mg/dl
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eunsu Choi
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Choi ES, Oh AY, Koo BW, Hwang JW, Han JW, Seo KS, Ahn SH, Jeong WJ. Comparison of reversal with neostigmine of low-dose rocuronium vs. reversal with sugammadex of high-dose rocuronium for a short procedure. Anaesthesia. 2017 Oct;72(10):1185-1190. doi: 10.1111/anae.13894. Epub 2017 May 11.
PMID: 28493510DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eunsu Choi
- Organization
- Seoul national university Bundang Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ah Young Oh
Bungdang Seoul National University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2014
First Posted
January 1, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 17, 2017
Results First Posted
April 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2015-07