Neoplastic Barrett Esophagus: Endoscopic Piecemeal vs. En Bloc Resection
BEEPER
Prospektiv-randomisierter Vergleich Von En-bloc- Versus Piecemeal-Resektion Von Barrett Neoplasien Des Ösophagus Neoplastic Barrett Esophagus: Endoscopic Piecemeal vs. En Bloc Resection
1 other identifier
interventional
407
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The study will compare EMR versus ESD technique (both combined with subsequent ablative therapy) of mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus with regard to efficacy and risk in a long term setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedJune 28, 2023
June 1, 2023
8.8 years
November 8, 2017
June 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success
Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control EGD 3 months after end of treatment
3 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)
Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success
Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control EGD 9 months after end of treatment
9 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)
Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus
Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control 24 months after end of treatment
24 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)
Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus
Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control EGD 33 months after end of treatment
33 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success
3 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)
Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success
9 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)
Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, freedom of recurrence
24 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)
Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, freedom of recurrence
33 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)
Recurrence rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success
3 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EMR
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoscopic mucosal resection
ESD
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoscopic submucosal dissection
Interventions
Endoscopic resection is carried out using a double-channel scope. The lesion borders are marked with a coagulator. Saline liquid and sometimes epinephrine are injected into the submucosal layer to swell the area containing the lesion and elucidate the markings. The resected mucosa is lifted, then trapped and strangulated with a snare, and subsequently resected by electrocautery. Another method of EMR employs the use of a clear cap and prelooped snare inside the cap. After insertion, the cap is placed on the lesion and the mucosa containing the lesion is drawn up inside the cap by aspiration. The mucosa is caught by the snare and strangulated, and finally resected by electrocautery.
After circumferential cutting of the surrounding mucosa of the lesion, fluid is injected into the submucosa to elevate the lesion from the muscle layer, and the connective tissue of the submucosa beneath the lesion is dissected subsequently.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients to be treated for Barrett's esophagus by mucosal resection and following ablative therapy
- Barrett's mucosal extension up to 10 cm maximum.
- patient's ability for compliance to therapy
- signed Informed Consent
You may not qualify if:
- any lesion questionable to be resectable by mucosectomy, e.g. bulky lesions ≥10 mm in endoscopy und endosonography, suspected deep submucosal infiltration, ulcers, suspected or by FNA confirmed lymph node infiltration
- Barrett's esophagus \> 10 cm
- lesions that would afford resection of more than 2/3rd of esophagal circumference
- two or more single Barrett's lesions with bulky HGIN or early cancer histology, not to be resectable in one half of esophageal circumference
- planned circumferencial resections
- very serious general illness and metastatic carcinoma
- coagulation disorder or anticoagulants that make biopsies and resections impossible
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status \> III
- pregnancy and lactation
- remainders or recurrences after therapeutic history of Barrett's espohagus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Orlando Health
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Related Publications (11)
Anders M, Bahr C, El-Masry MA, Marx AH, Koch M, Seewald S, Schachschal G, Adler A, Soehendra N, Izbicki J, Neuhaus P, Pohl H, Rosch T. Long-term recurrence of neoplasia and Barrett's epithelium after complete endoscopic resection. Gut. 2014 Oct;63(10):1535-43. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305538. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
PMID: 24389236BACKGROUNDBARRETT NR. The oesophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Gastroenterologia. 1956;86(3):183-6. doi: 10.1159/000200553. No abstract available.
PMID: 13384591BACKGROUNDBARRETT NR. The lower esophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Surgery. 1957 Jun;41(6):881-94. No abstract available.
PMID: 13442856BACKGROUNDDunbar KB, Spechler SJ. Controversies in Barrett esophagus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jul;89(7):973-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 May 24.
PMID: 24867396BACKGROUNDEdgren G, Adami HO, Weiderpass E, Nyren O. A global assessment of the oesophageal adenocarcinoma epidemic. Gut. 2013 Oct;62(10):1406-14. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302412. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
PMID: 22917659BACKGROUNDHobel S, Dautel P, Baumbach R, Oldhafer KJ, Stang A, Feyerabend B, Yahagi N, Schrader C, Faiss S. Single center experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1591-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3847-5. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
PMID: 25294533BACKGROUNDLabenz J, Koop H, Tannapfel A, Kiesslich R, Holscher AH. The epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Barrett's carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Mar 27;112(13):224-33; quiz 234. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0224.
PMID: 25869347BACKGROUNDNeuhaus H. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West--too many concerns and caveats? Endoscopy. 2010 Oct;42(10):859-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255724. Epub 2010 Sep 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 20886404BACKGROUNDPech O, May A, Manner H, Behrens A, Pohl J, Weferling M, Hartmann U, Manner N, Huijsmans J, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C. Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):652-660.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PMID: 24269290BACKGROUNDPhoa KN, Pouw RE, Bisschops R, Pech O, Ragunath K, Weusten BL, Schumacher B, Rembacken B, Meining A, Messmann H, Schoon EJ, Gossner L, Mannath J, Seldenrijk CA, Visser M, Lerut T, Seewald S, ten Kate FJ, Ell C, Neuhaus H, Bergman JJ. Multimodality endoscopic eradication for neoplastic Barrett oesophagus: results of an European multicentre study (EURO-II). Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):555-62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309298. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
PMID: 25731874BACKGROUNDSpechler SJ, Souza RF. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):836-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1314704. No abstract available.
PMID: 25162890BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Rösch, Prof. Dr.
Ph D, Director, Head of department
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2017
First Posted
February 9, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share