NCT03427346

Brief Summary

The study will compare EMR versus ESD technique (both combined with subsequent ablative therapy) of mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus with regard to efficacy and risk in a long term setting.

Trial Health

47
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
407

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2018

Completed
7.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8.8 years

First QC Date

November 8, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Barrett EsophagusESDEMREsophagus Neoplasmendoscopic resection techniqueablation of esophageal mucosa

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success

    Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control EGD 3 months after end of treatment

    3 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)

  • Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success

    Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control EGD 9 months after end of treatment

    9 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)

  • Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus

    Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control 24 months after end of treatment

    24 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)

  • Eradication rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus

    Rate of complete and curative eradication, free of recurrence of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Endoscopical diagnostic and negative histologies for any kind of neoplasia, measured in follow up control EGD 33 months after end of treatment

    33 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success

    3 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)

  • Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success

    9 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)

  • Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, freedom of recurrence

    24 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)

  • Eradication rate of complete Barrett's Esophagus, freedom of recurrence

    33 months after end of treatment (resection and ablation)

  • Recurrence rate of neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus, initial therapy success

    3 months after end of therapy (resection and ablation)

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

EMR

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Endoscopic mucosal resection

Procedure: Endoscopic mucosal resection

ESD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Interventions

Endoscopic resection is carried out using a double-channel scope. The lesion borders are marked with a coagulator. Saline liquid and sometimes epinephrine are injected into the submucosal layer to swell the area containing the lesion and elucidate the markings. The resected mucosa is lifted, then trapped and strangulated with a snare, and subsequently resected by electrocautery. Another method of EMR employs the use of a clear cap and prelooped snare inside the cap. After insertion, the cap is placed on the lesion and the mucosa containing the lesion is drawn up inside the cap by aspiration. The mucosa is caught by the snare and strangulated, and finally resected by electrocautery.

Also known as: EMR, Piecemeal EMR
EMR

After circumferential cutting of the surrounding mucosa of the lesion, fluid is injected into the submucosa to elevate the lesion from the muscle layer, and the connective tissue of the submucosa beneath the lesion is dissected subsequently.

Also known as: ESD
ESD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients to be treated for Barrett's esophagus by mucosal resection and following ablative therapy
  • Barrett's mucosal extension up to 10 cm maximum.
  • patient's ability for compliance to therapy
  • signed Informed Consent

You may not qualify if:

  • any lesion questionable to be resectable by mucosectomy, e.g. bulky lesions ≥10 mm in endoscopy und endosonography, suspected deep submucosal infiltration, ulcers, suspected or by FNA confirmed lymph node infiltration
  • Barrett's esophagus \> 10 cm
  • lesions that would afford resection of more than 2/3rd of esophagal circumference
  • two or more single Barrett's lesions with bulky HGIN or early cancer histology, not to be resectable in one half of esophageal circumference
  • planned circumferencial resections
  • very serious general illness and metastatic carcinoma
  • coagulation disorder or anticoagulants that make biopsies and resections impossible
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status \> III
  • pregnancy and lactation
  • remainders or recurrences after therapeutic history of Barrett's espohagus

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Orlando Health

Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States

RECRUITING

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, 20246, Germany

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Anders M, Bahr C, El-Masry MA, Marx AH, Koch M, Seewald S, Schachschal G, Adler A, Soehendra N, Izbicki J, Neuhaus P, Pohl H, Rosch T. Long-term recurrence of neoplasia and Barrett's epithelium after complete endoscopic resection. Gut. 2014 Oct;63(10):1535-43. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305538. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

    PMID: 24389236BACKGROUND
  • BARRETT NR. The oesophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Gastroenterologia. 1956;86(3):183-6. doi: 10.1159/000200553. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13384591BACKGROUND
  • BARRETT NR. The lower esophagus lined by columnar epithelium. Surgery. 1957 Jun;41(6):881-94. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13442856BACKGROUND
  • Dunbar KB, Spechler SJ. Controversies in Barrett esophagus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jul;89(7):973-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 May 24.

    PMID: 24867396BACKGROUND
  • Edgren G, Adami HO, Weiderpass E, Nyren O. A global assessment of the oesophageal adenocarcinoma epidemic. Gut. 2013 Oct;62(10):1406-14. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302412. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

    PMID: 22917659BACKGROUND
  • Hobel S, Dautel P, Baumbach R, Oldhafer KJ, Stang A, Feyerabend B, Yahagi N, Schrader C, Faiss S. Single center experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1591-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3847-5. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

    PMID: 25294533BACKGROUND
  • Labenz J, Koop H, Tannapfel A, Kiesslich R, Holscher AH. The epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Barrett's carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Mar 27;112(13):224-33; quiz 234. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0224.

    PMID: 25869347BACKGROUND
  • Neuhaus H. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West--too many concerns and caveats? Endoscopy. 2010 Oct;42(10):859-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255724. Epub 2010 Sep 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20886404BACKGROUND
  • Pech O, May A, Manner H, Behrens A, Pohl J, Weferling M, Hartmann U, Manner N, Huijsmans J, Gossner L, Rabenstein T, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C. Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for patients with mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):652-660.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

    PMID: 24269290BACKGROUND
  • Phoa KN, Pouw RE, Bisschops R, Pech O, Ragunath K, Weusten BL, Schumacher B, Rembacken B, Meining A, Messmann H, Schoon EJ, Gossner L, Mannath J, Seldenrijk CA, Visser M, Lerut T, Seewald S, ten Kate FJ, Ell C, Neuhaus H, Bergman JJ. Multimodality endoscopic eradication for neoplastic Barrett oesophagus: results of an European multicentre study (EURO-II). Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):555-62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309298. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

    PMID: 25731874BACKGROUND
  • Spechler SJ, Souza RF. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):836-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1314704. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25162890BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Barrett EsophagusEsophageal Neoplasms

Interventions

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteHead and Neck Neoplasms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Thomas Rösch, Prof. Dr.

    Ph D, Director, Head of department

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Thomas Rösch, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

Hanno Ehlken, Dr.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2017

First Posted

February 9, 2018

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

June 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations