Benefits of an Intervention Combining Hypnosis and Self-care for Prostate Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
46
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the impact of a group intervention combining self-hypnosis and self-care techniques on prostate patients' well-being. More specifically, the investigators want to investigate the effects of that intervention on sleep, fatigue and emotional distress of the patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Oct 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 14, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2018
CompletedFebruary 6, 2018
February 1, 2018
2.7 years
January 30, 2018
February 5, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Fatigue
A sense of tiredness or exhaustion linked with cancer and its treatments, that is not alleviated by sleep. Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Core Questionnaire-30 (EORTC-QLCQ30). One symptom-related scale (fatigue, score based on 3 items, varies from 0 to 100, 100 being the worst fatigue endured) and the global health status (2 items, score varies from 0 to 100, 100 being the best quality of life) are used in this study.
T0 (before the intervention) and T1 (after the intervention : 6 months later).
Change in emotional distress
Anxiety + Depression, measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Scores range (total): 0-42 (0-14: absence of anxio-depressive disorder ; 15-42: presence of anxio-depressive disorder). Two scales: anxiety and depression. For each, scores range 0-21 (0-7: absence of anxious or depressive disorder; 8-10: possibility of an anxious or depressive disorder; 11-21: presence of anxious or depressive disorder).
T0 (before the intervention) and T1 (after the intervention : 6 months later).
Change in sleep difficulties
Sleep difficulties (difficulties to stay asleep, to fall asleep...) and their severity. Measured by the Insomnia Severity Index. One score is calculated and ranges from 0 to 22 (0-7: absence of insomnia; 8-14: subclinical insomnia; 15-21: moderate insomnia; 22-28: severe insomnia).
T0 (before the intervention) and T1 (after the intervention : 6 months later).
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group : hypnosis + self-care
EXPERIMENTALGroupal intervention combining self-care techniques and self-hypnosis exercises
Control group : no intervention
NO INTERVENTIONControl group receiving usual care but not the intervention
Interventions
Our groupal intervention is divided into 6 monthly 2-hour sessions in which one self-hypnosis exercise is proposed to participants. Self-care techniques are also discussed (knowing our own needs, selfrespect, assertiveness, coping with ruminations...) and homework assignments are proposed to participants, in order to foster positive change.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years-old,
- ability to read, write and speak French
- prostate cancer diagnosis
- treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy.
You may not qualify if:
- metastases
- major cognitive or psychiatric disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Liegelead
- Free University of Brusselscollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Gregoire C, Nicolas H, Bragard I, Delevallez F, Merckaert I, Razavi D, Waltregny D, Faymonville ME, Vanhaudenhuyse A. Efficacy of a hypnosis-based intervention to improve well-being during cancer: a comparison between prostate and breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4607-z.
PMID: 29929493DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville
University of Liege
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2018
First Posted
February 6, 2018
Study Start
October 14, 2013
Primary Completion
June 15, 2016
Study Completion
June 15, 2016
Last Updated
February 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share