NCT01858688

Brief Summary

Some men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer do not require immediate treatment. Rather, they can be followed closely with regular physical exams, blood work and repeated biopsies of the prostate. If the prostate cancer is becoming more aggressive, curative treatment can be offered at that time. This strategy of delaying treatment until necessary is called active surveillance in prostate cancer. Active surveillance is a way of monitoring prostate cancer which aims to avoid or delay unnecessary treatment in men with less aggressive cancer. Prostate cancer can be slow growing and, for many men, the disease may never progress or cause any symptoms. In other words, many men with prostate cancer will never need any treatment. Treatments for prostate cancer may cause side effects which can affect your quality of life. By monitoring the cancer with regular tests, you can avoid or delay these side effects. Active surveillance is generally suitable for men with low risk early stage prostate cancer that is contained within the prostate gland (localized prostate cancer). If doctors had a better way of identifying who might be best suited for this approach, it would likely become more appealing for more men. In this study, the investigators are looking at how accurate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is at identifying high-risk prostate cancer, which might make a man a poor candidate for active surveillance. To do this, the investigators are collecting data from the MRI scan of men and comparing it to a trans-rectal biopsy performed following the scan. The results of this study will help inform doctors how accurate the MRI is in identifying men who should not be on active surveillance.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
101

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2018

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 18, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2013

Results QC Date

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate CancerMRIActive surveillance in prostate cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • MP-erMRI Classification Sensitivity

    The classification sensitivity of multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MP-erMRI) when compared to the standard of care procedure (transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) re-biopsy) The sensitivity is equivalent to the proportion of patients who were reclassified by MP- erMRI out of the total number of patients who should have been reclassified (given their TRUS re-biopsy result). In other words, it is the proportion of participants reclassified appropriately by MP- erMRI.

    From baseline biopsy to final biopsy, up to 18 months

  • MP- erMRI Classification Specificity

    The classification specificity of multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MP-erMRI) when compared to the standard of care procedure (transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) re-biopsy) The specificity is equivalent to the proportion of patients who were not reclassified by MP- erMRI out of the total number of patients who should have been not reclassified (given their TRUS re-biopsy result). In other words, it is the proportion of participants not reclassified appropriately by MP- erMRI.

    From baseline biopsy to final biopsy, up to 18 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Frequency of Reclassification

    From baseline biopsy to final MRI, up to 18 months

  • Median Change in Illness-Related Uncertainty, Anxiety, and Distress

    From baseline biopsy to final MRI, up to 18 months

  • Median Change in Service Satisfaction

    From baseline biopsy to final MRI, up to 18 months

  • Median Change in Prostate Cancer Symptoms

    From baseline biopsy to final MRI, up to 18 months

  • Median Change in Urinary Symptoms

    From baseline biopsy to final MRI, up to 18 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Accuracy of multi-parametric MRI relative to prostate biopsy

EXPERIMENTAL

Determine the sensitivity and specificity of MP-erMRI relative to repeat 12 core TRUS biopsy for classifying upgrading of disease extent or Gleason grade in men considering AS.

Device: Multiparametric MRIProcedure: Prostate biopsy

Interventions

an MRI of the prostate will be performed

Accuracy of multi-parametric MRI relative to prostate biopsy

a biopsy of the prostate will be performed according to standard procedures for men on active surveillance

Accuracy of multi-parametric MRI relative to prostate biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must meet the following criteria on screening examination to be eligible to participate in the study:
  • The subject will have histologically confirmed prostate cancer with all of the following features:
  • Minimum 10 core prostate biopsy showing histologically-confirmed prostate cancer within 12 months of enrollment reviewed by a pathologist from one of the DF/HCC associated hospitals
  • Gleason ≤3+3
  • No tertiary Gleason grade ≥4
  • ≤3 total cores positive
  • ≤50% of any given core involved with cancer
  • No evidence on biopsy of extracapsular extension
  • PSA within one month of enrollment: \<10 ng/mL
  • Clinical stage: ≤T2a \& N0 or NX \& M0
  • The subject is able and willing to abide by the study protocol or cooperate fully with the investigator or designee
  • The subject is capable of understanding and complying with the protocol requirements and has signed the informed consent document
  • Age ≥18
  • Life expectancy of greater than 10 years
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who exhibit any of the following conditions at screening will not be eligible for admission into the study.
  • First diagnosis of prostate cancer \> 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Prior prostate cancer-directed therapy including:
  • androgen deprivation therapy
  • radiation therapy to the prostate (external beam or brachytherapy)
  • cryotherapy
  • high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)
  • chemotherapy for prostate cancer
  • Prior transurethral resection of prostate
  • Subject who is deemed by the treating physician to have a contraindication to definitive treatment
  • Subjects with a contraindication to an MRI including those with a pacemaker, ferromagnetic aneurysm clip, or cochlear implants
  • Subjects with a contraindication to receiving Gadolinium containing contrast for the MRI
  • Conditions which make repeat TRUS biopsies not feasible

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Neil Martin, MD
Organization
Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Study Officials

  • Neil E Martin, MD

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Evaluation of accuracy of the MRI relative to biopsy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2013

First Posted

May 21, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

May 1, 2018

Study Completion

April 1, 2023

Last Updated

May 3, 2023

Results First Posted

May 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations