Blue Laser Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonic Polyps
A Prospective Randomized Study of Colonoscopy Using Blue Laser Imaging and White Light Imaging in the Detection and Differentiation of Colonic Polyps
1 other identifier
interventional
184
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy for asymptomatic individuals aged 50 years and older is estimated to be at least 25%. It is known that during colonoscopy, lesions may be missed. Image enhanced endoscopy techniques have been evaluated for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Narrow band imaging (NBI), is one such technique. The common classification systems used predict histology is the NICE and the Sano and JNET classification. The NICE classification can be used without optical magnification; it evaluates the color of the lesion, regularity of the overlying vessels and regularity of the surface pattern. The Sano and JNET classification requires optical magnification in order to assess the capillary patterns such as whether there is dilation, irregularity or loss of irregular capillaries over the lesion. In the context of adenoma detection, the results are more contentious. A meta-analysis of randomized studies examining the utility of the first generation NBI system when compared to high definition WLI showed no difference in detection rates. A criticism of the NBI system had been the dark endoscopic view; this is a result of the optical filter, and can limit the far view. A second generation NBI system has since been developed. It is characterized by much brighter illumination despite the optical filter, and thus the far view is improved. A recent randomized controlled study compared the second-generation NBI system with high definition WLI. NBI was shown to improve polyp and adenoma detection rates compared to WLI. Blue laser imaging (BLI) is another form of narrow bandwidth imaging developed by Fujifilm Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). Instead of using an optical filter for white light to produce narrow bandwidths, the BLI system has a unique feature of illumination using two lasers and a white light phosphor to accomplish the visual enhancement of surface vessels and structures. This study aims to determine whether BLI can increase the detection rate of colonic polyps and adenomas when compared to white light endoscopy, with the null hypothesis being no difference in detection rates. This study will also examine the use of NICE and Sano/ JNET classification systems to predict histology with the BLI system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 22, 2019
CompletedJanuary 23, 2020
January 1, 2020
2 years
March 28, 2017
January 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
adenoma detection rate
the proportion of patients who had an adenoma detected
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Blue laser imaging
ACTIVE COMPARATORBlue laser imaging
White light imaging
EXPERIMENTALWhite light imaging
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- An individual undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy
- An individual undergoing screening colonoscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding
- Familial colorectal cancer syndrome
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Bloody diarrhoea
- Colonic resection
- Extensive abdominal or pelvic surgery where colonoscopy may be considered difficult
- Patients considered to be unsafe for biopsies or polypectomy due to bleeding tendency
- Situations where complete colonoscopy cannot be completed or performed
- Severe comorbid illnesses (ASA 3 and above)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, 529889, Singapore
Related Publications (29)
Ang TL, Fock KM. Screening Colonoscopy for Average Risk Individuals in Singapore. Intest Res 2012; 10: 219-228.
RESULTWinawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.
PMID: 8247072RESULTZauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.
PMID: 22356322RESULTASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Fisher DA, Shergill AK, Early DS, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Foley KQ, Fonkalsrud L, Hwang JH, Jue T, Khashab MA, Lightdale JR, Muthusamy VR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Sharaf R, Cash BD. Role of endoscopy in the staging and management of colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.163. Epub 2013 May 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 23664162RESULTRex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 25480100RESULTvan Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
PMID: 16454841RESULTHassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, Marmo R, Omar M, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Zullo A, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):142-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
PMID: 23335011RESULTBarclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055498.
PMID: 17167136RESULTLee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR, Ho SB, Shah NK, Wetzel L, Bain AS, Mackintosh EE, Paek AM, Crissien AM, Saraf LJ, Kalmaz DM, Savides TJ. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
PMID: 21531410RESULTHewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.
PMID: 22609383RESULTHayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG, Kaltenbach TR, Sano Y, Ponchon T, Saunders BP, Rex DK, Soetikno RM. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.185. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
PMID: 23910062RESULTMcGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1704-13. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303965. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
PMID: 23300139RESULTASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
PMID: 25597420RESULTSano Y, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Emura F, Katagiri A, Horimatsu T, Kaneko K, Soetikno R, Yoshida S. Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.066. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
PMID: 18951131RESULTIkematsu H, Matsuda T, Emura F, Saito Y, Uraoka T, Fu KI, Kaneko K, Ochiai A, Fujimori T, Sano Y. Efficacy of capillary pattern type IIIA/IIIB by magnifying narrow band imaging for estimating depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar 27;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-33.
PMID: 20346170RESULTUraoka T, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Yamamoto K, Sano Y. Sano's capillary pattern classification for narrow-band imaging of early colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:112-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01118.x.
PMID: 21535215RESULTNagorni A, Bjelakovic G, Petrovic B. Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2.
PMID: 22258983RESULTLeung WK, Lo OS, Liu KS, Tong T, But DY, Lam FY, Hsu AS, Wong SY, Seto WK, Hung IF, Law WL. Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;109(6):855-63. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.83. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
PMID: 24751581RESULTYoshida N, Yagi N, Inada Y, Kugai M, Okayama T, Kamada K, Katada K, Uchiyama K, Ishikawa T, Handa O, Takagi T, Konishi H, Kokura S, Yanagisawa A, Naito Y. Ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc. 2014 Mar;26(2):250-8. doi: 10.1111/den.12127. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
PMID: 23731034RESULTYoshida N, Hisabe T, Inada Y, Kugai M, Yagi N, Hirai F, Yao K, Matsui T, Iwashita A, Kato M, Yanagisawa A, Naito Y. The ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of invasion depth of colorectal neoplasms. J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;49(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0772-7. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
PMID: 23494646RESULTYoshida N, Hisabe T, Hirose R, Ogiso K, Inada Y, Konishi H, Yagi N, Naito Y, Aomi Y, Ninomiya K, Ikezono G, Terasawa M, Yao K, Matsui T, Yanagisawa A, Itoh Y. Improvement in the visibility of colorectal polyps by using blue laser imaging (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
PMID: 25851158RESULTTogashi K, Nemoto D, Utano K, Isohata N, Kumamoto K, Endo S, Lefor AK. Blue laser imaging endoscopy system for the early detection and characterization of colorectal lesions: a guide for the endoscopist. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;9(1):50-6. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15603614.
PMID: 26770267RESULTKaneko K, Oono Y, Yano T, Ikematsu H, Odagaki T, Yoda Y, Yagishita A, Sato A, Nomura S. Effect of novel bright image enhanced endoscopy using blue laser imaging (BLI). Endosc Int Open. 2014 Dec;2(4):E212-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390707. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
PMID: 26135095RESULTLai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PMID: 19136102RESULTHamilton SR , Aaltonen LA (eds). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System, 2nd edn. IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2000.
RESULTAng TL, Fock KM, Teo EK, Tan J, Poh CH, Ong J, Ang D. The diagnostic utility of narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy in clinical practice in a population with intermediate gastric cancer risk. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;24(4):362-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283500968.
PMID: 22198222RESULTSano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Fujii T, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakamura H, Hotta K, Horimatsu T, Sakamoto N, Fu KI, Tsuruta O, Kawano H, Kashida H, Takeuchi Y, Machida H, Kusaka T, Yoshida N, Hirata I, Terai T, Yamano HO, Kaneko K, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi Y, Tamai N, Nakano N, Hayashi N, Oka S, Iwatate M, Ishikawa H, Murakami Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016 Jul;28(5):526-33. doi: 10.1111/den.12644. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
PMID: 26927367RESULTSumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Hirano D, Tamaru Y, Ninomiya Y, Asayama N, Hayashi N, Oka S, Arihiro K, Yoshihara M, Chayama K. Clinical impact and characteristics of the narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):816-821. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
PMID: 27460392RESULTSumimoto K, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Hayashi N, Hirano D, Tamaru Y, Ninomiya Y, Oka S, Arihiro K, Shimamoto F, Yoshihara M, Chayama K. Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among noninvasive, superficially invasive, and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):700-709. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
PMID: 28257790RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tiing Leong Ang, MBBS MRCP
Changi General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2017
First Posted
February 5, 2018
Study Start
July 12, 2017
Primary Completion
July 22, 2019
Study Completion
July 22, 2019
Last Updated
January 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share