Laser Hair Removal for Treatment of Pilonidal Disease
Laser Hair Removal for Primary Treatment of Pilonidal Disease Requiring Surgical Intervention
4 other identifiers
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project is a pilot study to determine if symptomatic pilonidal disease can be primarily managed with laser hair removal vs surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2021
CompletedDecember 17, 2021
December 1, 2021
2.7 years
November 16, 2018
December 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of disease-free remission
Disease free rate among those subjects who only required laser therapy. Disease-free remission will be assessed at 12 and 24 months.
up to 2 years
Disease recurrence rate among subjects who subsequently require surgical intervention.
Rate of recurrence of pilonidal disease among subjects who participated in the study but also required surgical intervention.
up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Characterization of the degree of intervention required to obtain positive results.
up to 2 years
Number of missed school or work days
Up to 18 months
Assessment of Pain via Promis 3A Pain Short Form
up to 18 months
Number of Days Participants Experience Drainage
up to 18 months
Cost-benefit analysis of laser hair-treated patients versus matched historical control.
up to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
Laser hair removal treatment
EXPERIMENTALPatients who choose to enroll will plan to undergo a total of up to 8 laser hair removal sessions every 4-6 weeks. If patients develop abscess or infection during this time, they will undergo I\&D and/or antibiotics, consistent with standard therapy for infection or abscess. If patients have 2 or more infections in 1 year, pain or drainage for more than 1 month, or miss more than 1 week of school or work due to ineffective treatment of pilonidal disease, these patients will undergo surgical excision and subsequent follow-up at surgeon's discretion. Patients will follow up at 2-4-week intervals for 3 months, then at 6, 9, and 18 months after conclusion of the laser therapy sessions. At all follow-up sessions, patients will be given the DQLI, CDQLI, and Promis 3A Pain survey. Unscheduled visits such as unplanned clinic visits, emergency department encounters, and hospitalizations, will be included in data collected for analysis of primary and secondary outcomes.
Interventions
Those who consent to participate in the study will be treated with up to 8 sessions of laser hair removal utilizing a long-pulsed laser to the natal cleft at treatment intervals of 4-6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with symptomatic pilonidal disease, who meet criteria for surgical intervention:
- Experience two or more episodes of infection or abscess in the past 12 months
- Have pain or drainage for a total of more than 1 month in the past 12 months
- Missed a total of more than 1 week of school or work in the past 12 months
- English-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have co-morbidities that prevent them from becoming a surgical candidate
- Previous history of laser hair removal in the gluteal cleft (prior to initial enrollment)
- Previous excision of pilonidal sinus (prior to initial enrollment)
- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Wisconsin, Madisonlead
- Syneron Candelacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Related Publications (16)
von Laffert M, Stadie V, Ulrich J, Marsch WC, Wohlrab J. Morphology of pilonidal sinus disease: some evidence of its being a unilocalized type of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatology. 2011;223(4):349-55. doi: 10.1159/000335373. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
PMID: 22269798BACKGROUNDSondenaa K, Pollard ML. Histology of chronic pilonidal sinus. APMIS. 1995 Apr;103(4):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1995.tb01105.x.
PMID: 7542011BACKGROUNDSondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00337585.
PMID: 7745322BACKGROUNDAl-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.
PMID: 20091589BACKGROUNDSteele SR, Perry WB, Mills S, Buie WD; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Sep;56(9):1021-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829d2616. No abstract available.
PMID: 23929010BACKGROUNDStauffer VK, Luedi MM, Kauf P, Schmid M, Diekmann M, Wieferich K, Schnuriger B, Doll D. Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.
PMID: 29449548BACKGROUNDDoll D, Krueger CM, Schrank S, Dettmann H, Petersen S, Duesel W. Timeline of recurrence after primary and secondary pilonidal sinus surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Nov;50(11):1928-34. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9031-4.
PMID: 17874268BACKGROUNDKhan MA, Javed AA, Govindan KS, Rafiq S, Thomas K, Baker L, Kenealy J. Control of hair growth using long-pulsed alexandrite laser is an efficient and cost effective therapy for patients suffering from recurrent pilonidal disease. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Jul;31(5):857-62. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1920-0. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
PMID: 27003897BACKGROUNDDragoni F, Moretti S, Cannarozzo G, Campolmi P. Treatment of recurrent pilonidal cysts with nd-YAG laser: report of our experience. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018 Feb;29(1):65-67. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1329513. Epub 2017 May 30.
PMID: 28521574BACKGROUNDOram Y, Kahraman F, Karincaoglu Y, Koyuncu E. Evaluation of 60 patients with pilonidal sinus treated with laser epilation after surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(1):88-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01387.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
PMID: 20002644BACKGROUNDPronk AA, Eppink L, Smakman N, Furnee EJB. The effect of hair removal after surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jan;22(1):7-14. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1722-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
PMID: 29185064BACKGROUNDToosi P, Sadighha A, Sharifian A, Razavi GM. A comparison study of the efficacy and side effects of different light sources in hair removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2006 Apr;21(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s10103-006-0373-2. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
PMID: 16583183BACKGROUNDNanni CA, Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Aug;41(2 Pt 1):165-71. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70043-5.
PMID: 10426883BACKGROUNDMutus HM, Aksu B, Uzun E, Gulcin N, Gercel G, Ozatman E, Durakbasa CU, Okur H. Long-term analysis of surgical treatment outcomes in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):293-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
PMID: 29217319BACKGROUNDPascoe VL, Kimball AB. Seasonal variation of acne and psoriasis: A 3-year study using the Physician Global Assessment severity scale. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73(3):523-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.001. No abstract available.
PMID: 26282801BACKGROUNDKimball AB, Jemec GB, Yang M, Kageleiry A, Signorovitch JE, Okun MM, Gu Y, Wang K, Mulani P, Sundaram M. Assessing the validity, responsiveness and meaningfulness of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) as the clinical endpoint for hidradenitis suppurativa treatment. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Dec;171(6):1434-42. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13270. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
PMID: 25040429BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2018
First Posted
May 14, 2019
Study Start
February 18, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 30, 2021
Last Updated
December 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share