The Role of Cognitive Control in the Transdiagnostic Conceptualization of "Intrusive Thoughts"
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators are examining whether difficulties with cognitive control (i.e., the ability to stop one's thought process and shift attention) is a common problem across three types of repetitive, negative thinking: obsessions (as seen in obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD), worries (as seen in generalized anxiety disorder, GAD), and ruminations (as seen in major depressive disorder, MDD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 6, 2020
CompletedMarch 18, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.8 years
January 23, 2018
March 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Commission Errors on the Go/No Go Task
In the Go/No Go Task participants press a button immediately upon detecting a target stimulus (e.g., a square), but are told to refrain from responding to a "no go" stimulus (e.g., a cross of similar size). The main outcome is commission errors (i.e., responding to a "no go" stimulus).
Day 1
Response time on the Stroop Color Word Test
In the Stroop Color Word Test participants are asked to name the color of the ink in which words are printed, rather than reading the words.
Day 1
Perseverative Errors on the Wisconsin Card Sort Test
In the Wisconsin Card Sort Test participants are asked to match a stack of response cards to four stimulus cards without knowing the matching rule. They receive feedback for each trial about whether their matching was correct or not. After ten consecutive correct trials, the matching criterion changes without notice requiring the use of flexible goal-driven strategies.
Day 1
Gaze latency on the Attentional Engagement-Disengagement Task
In the Attentional Engagement-Disengagement Task two emotional facial stimuli are presented on the computer screen (i.e., happy, disgusted, fearful, and sad faces paired with neutral faces) and eye tracking (when participants shift from the emotional to neutral face and vice versa) is measured.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ)
Day 1
State measure of intrusive thinking
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Intrusive Thoughts Group
EXPERIMENTALClinically significant intrusive thought in the domain of obsessions, worries, or depressive ruminations with a score above the clinical mean (≥ 37) on the trait repetitive negative thinking measure (Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire, PTQ). These participants will receive the Cognitive Control Tasks and Script Driven Imagery Intervention.
Non-psychiatric Control Group
EXPERIMENTALA score 1 SD below the community mean (≤ 15) on the trait repetitive negative thinking measure (Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire, PTQ). These participants will also receive the Cognitive Control Tasks and Script Driven Imagery Intervention.
Interventions
All participants will receive a structured diagnostic assessment and complete self-report questionnaires about cognitive factors and anxiety/mood symptoms. They then will complete a battery of neuropsychological executive functioning tasks on the computer, each of which measures a different facet of cognitive control (i.e., response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and attentional control). Finally, they will be guided through a standardized script-driven imagery paradigm that involves generating and listening to an individualized imaginal script associated with a moderately distressing intrusive thought. Self-report and psychophysiological data will be collected during this exercise.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (age 18+)
- Intrusive thoughts group: Clinically significant intrusive thought in the domain of obsessions, worries, or depressive ruminations with a score above the clinical mean (≥ 37) on the trait repetitive negative thinking measure (Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire, PTQ)
- Non-psychiatric control (NPC) group: A score 1 SD below the community mean (≤ 15) on the trait repetitive negative thinking measure (PTQ)
- Sufficient fluency of English to understand study procedures and questionnaires
- Ability to provide informed consent.
- Comfortable and capable of using a computer and completing reaction-time tasks.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute psychosis, mania, or suicidality
- Diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; in order to preserve diagnostic clarity of the domains of intrusive thoughts under investigation)
- Serious neurological disorder or impairment (e.g., brain damage, blindness), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, or autism.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- Health Resources in Action, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (1)
Daniel KE, Wilhelm S, Jacoby RJ. Predictors of polyregulation and its effectiveness following exposure to One's most personally distressing intrusive thought. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;86:102001. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.102001. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
PMID: 39626971DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ryan J Jacoby, Ph.D.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ryan Jane Jacoby, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, OCD and Related Disorders Program
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2018
First Posted
January 30, 2018
Study Start
May 18, 2018
Primary Completion
March 6, 2020
Study Completion
March 6, 2020
Last Updated
March 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share