NCT03412916

Brief Summary

The aims of this study are to adapt, pilot, and examine the credibility, acceptability, and feasibility of an evidence-based mind-body program, the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Chronic Pain (p3RP), and the p3RP-Digital Monitoring Device (p3RP-DMD), which is the p3RP integrated with a commercial DMD, the Fitbit.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 12, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2018

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2020

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 14, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 14, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

January 12, 2018

Results QC Date

March 30, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic PainPhysical ActivityMind-body

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Percentage of Participants With Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 3-Item (CSQ-3) Scores Above and Below the Scale Midpoint

    Items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 3 to 12, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.

    Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Therapist Adherence

    Two independent coders rated whether clinicians delivered each component of study sessions (e.g., deep breathing, providing education on prevalent myths about chronic pain) , exhibited skillful delivery (e.g., active listening, validation), and followed study protocol (e.g., collecting home practice sheets, logging attendance). Each individual component was rated on a yes/no scale. The adherent ("yes") components were summed, tallied against the total number of components in the adherence checklist, and averaged between the 2 reviewers. The score represents a total rate of adherence.

    Collected during the intervention

  • Adherence to DMD - Number of Participants Who Wore DMD for ≥ 5 and < 5 Out of 7 Days

    Rate of participant's use of ActiGraph watch for a period of one week at both baseline and post-treatment assessments. A valid day of wear consisted of at least 7 hours of wear time.

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Program Safety - Number of Adverse Events Related to Study Participation

    Any self-reported or observed negative events related to participation.

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Adherence to Home Practice - Number of Participants That Completed Homework Logs That Met Adherence Criteria

    Rate of participant's completion of homework assigned throughout the study. Logs were considered adherent if participants completed 3 home practice components 3 out of 7 days per week or 1 home practice component 5 out of 7 days per week.

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Feasibility of Quantitative Measures

    The number of participants that completed quantitative measures. Rate of participant's completion of self-report measures administered at baseline and post-test assessments.

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

    Number of participants who score above the midpoint on two subscales assessed using frequencies and proportions. The measure involves two subscales: credibility (questions 1-3) and expectancy (questions 4-6). Subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater perceived credibility and greater belief that treatment will help.

    Baseline (0 Weeks)

  • Program Acceptability

    Assessed via the percentage of participants who attended at least 7 out of 10 sessions.

    Post-Test (10 Weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • 6-Min Walk Test Distance

    6 minutes at baseline (0 Weeks), 6 minutes at post-test (10 Weeks).

  • ActiGraph Average Steps

    1 week at baseline (0 Weeks), 1 week at post-test (10 Weeks)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Physical Activity Scale for Persons With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD)

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  • WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), 3-Month Follow-Up (23 Weeks)

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

GetActive

EXPERIMENTAL

The GetActive program uses a multimodal approach to introduce and reinforce new skills, including didactics, in-session activities, discussions, and weekly practice assignments (homework). The GetActive sessions reflect a purposeful integration of the three treatment approaches (relaxation methods, stress appraisal \& coping, and growth enhancement). The format is a 10-week program with weekly meetings and a focus on relaxation response strategies, cognitive behavioral training, positive psychology and mind-body interactions.

Behavioral: GetActive

GetActive with Fitbit

EXPERIMENTAL

The GetActive with Fitbit is identical to that of the p3RP with the addition of a digital monitoring device (i.e., Fitbit) for recording of physical activity.

Behavioral: Get Active with Fitbit

Interventions

GetActiveBEHAVIORAL

GetActive is a comprehensive, multimodal treatment that was designed to increase quality of life, resiliency and ability to cope with medical symptoms and stress. This program is rooted in the elicitation of the relaxation response, a non-judgmental state of focused attention and increased awareness.

Also known as: The Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Pain
GetActive

The GetActive Program for Pain with a Digital Monitoring Device (GetActive Fitbit) is identical to the GetActive with the addition of a FitBit for recording of physical activity.

Also known as: The Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Pain with DMD
GetActive with Fitbit

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients, age 18 years or older
  • Have nonmalignant chronic pain for more than 3 months
  • Able to perform a 6-minute walk test
  • Owns a smartphone with Bluetooth 4.0
  • Willingness and ability to participate in the 3RP intervention and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol (including weekly sessions and DMD use)
  • Free of concurrent psychotropic or pain medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment, OR stable on current psychotropic or pain medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose
  • Cleared by a medical doctor for study participation
  • Leads a sedentary lifestyle

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with medical illness expected to worsen in the next 6 months
  • Serious mental illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely in the next 6 months
  • Current suicidal ideation reported on self-report
  • Lifetime history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other psychotic disorder, or substance dependence
  • Current substance use disorder, within the past 6 months
  • Practice of yoga/meditation, or other mind-body techniques that elicit the relaxation response, once per week for 45 minutes or more within the last 3 months or less
  • Regular use of DMD in the last 3 months
  • Engagement in regular intensive physical exercise for \>30 minute daily
  • Unable to walk without use of assistance (e.g., wheelchair, walker)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Hopkins SW, Greenberg J, Isaacs J, Vranceanu AM. "Practice Makes Perfect"? Associations Between Home Practice and Physical and Emotional Function Outcomes Among Patients with Chronic Pain Enrolled in a Mind-Body Program. J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):320-327. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0324. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

  • Greenberg J, Singh T, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Vranceanu AM. Sustainability of Improvements in Adaptive Coping Following Mind-Body and Activity Training for Chronic Pain. Int J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;28(6):820-826. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09971-3. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

  • Greenberg J, Mace RA, Bannon SM, Kulich RJ, Vranceanu AM. Mind-Body Activity Program for Chronic Pain: Exploring Mechanisms of Improvement in Patient-Reported, Performance-Based and Ambulatory Physical Function. J Pain Res. 2021 Feb 5;14:359-368. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S298212. eCollection 2021.

  • Bannon S, Greenberg J, Mace RA, Locascio JJ, Vranceanu AM. The role of social isolation in physical and emotional outcomes among patients with chronic pain. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;69:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

  • Greenberg J, Lin A, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Edwards RR, Vranceanu AM. Getting Active Mindfully: Rationale and Case Illustration of a Group Mind-body and Activity Program for Chronic Pain. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Dec;28(4):706-719. doi: 10.1007/s10880-020-09758-w. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

  • Greenberg J, Mace RA, Popok PJ, Kulich RJ, Patel KV, Burns JW, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, Schatman ME, Vranceanu AM. Psychosocial Correlates of Objective, Performance-Based, and Patient-Reported Physical Function Among Patients with Heterogeneous Chronic Pain. J Pain Res. 2020 Sep 10;13:2255-2265. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S266455. eCollection 2020.

  • Greenberg J, Popok PJ, Lin A, Kulich RJ, James P, Macklin EA, Millstein RA, Edwards RR, Vranceanu AM. A Mind-Body Physical Activity Program for Chronic Pain With or Without a Digital Monitoring Device: Proof-of-Concept Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 8;4(6):e18703. doi: 10.2196/18703.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainChronic PainMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Organization
Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Psychologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2018

First Posted

January 29, 2018

Study Start

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2020

Last Updated

October 14, 2025

Results First Posted

October 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations