Three M Study (Malabsorption, Microbiota, Mini-Gastric Bypass)
Malabsorption and Gut Microbiota Profile Changes After Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass (MGB) vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): a Prospective Multicenter Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bariatric surgery represents the best therapeutic option to induce sustainable weight loss and to solve serious comorbidities improving the life-expectancy and the quality of life. Actually the choice of the procedure is based on the surgeon's and patients preference . Mini gastric bypass(MGB) is an emerging procedure offering excellent results in terms of weight loss and comorbidities (mainly metabolic) control. On the other hand, recent data indicated that the gut microbiota may mediate some of the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery and changes in the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota have been observed after RY Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in humans as well as in mice. However, there are no prospective investigations on Gut Microbiota changes after MGB, despite the procedure is described as "malabsorptive" and there are no studies comparing gut microbiota shift and malabsorption entity in humans after RYGB vs MGB. Thereafter prospective data on the incidence of bile reflux esophageal lesions after MGB are lacking. The aim of the present multicentric prospective comparative study is to evaluate malabsorption and gut microbiota shift after laparoscopic RYGB vs MGB at 1 year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 19, 2020
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.9 years
December 24, 2017
April 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gut Microbiota
To evaluate and compare Roux en Y Gastric Bypass vs Mini Gastric Bypass microbiota profile shift 1 year after surgery and its impact on metabolic and nutritional status after surgery.
0-6-12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Glucagon - like peptide 1 (GLP-1)
0-12 Months
Study Arms (2)
Mini Gastric Bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORMini Gastric Bypass: The gastric pouch will be performed starting below the incisura angularis (transverse resection 4 cm) on the lesser curvature (18).Then the stomach will be transected against a 36 Fr bougie up to the gastro-esophageal junction Then 1/3 of the small bowel will be excluded (approximately 200cms) and 3.5-4 cm gastro-jejunostomy will be performed by linear stapler.
Roux en Y Gastric Bypass
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoux en Y Gastric Bypass: The steps of the standard double loop RYGB technique will be followed (17). The gastric pouch will be created 7 cm from the gastro-esophageal junction to obtain a volume of 30-40 ml, and the length of the alimentary limb will be 150 cm and 3.5-4 cm gastro-jejunostomy will be performed by linear stapler. The length of the biliopancreatic limb will be from 65 to 75 cm beyond the ligament of Treitz. The lengths of both limbs should carefully measured with a graduated instrument. The mesenteric defects will be closed.
Interventions
Standardization of the techniques will be guaranteed: 1. Mini Gastric Bypass Arm 2. Roux en Y Gastric Bypass arm All patients will have intraoperative measurement of the whole length of bowel from Treitz ligament to the ileocecal junction (expected range 6-8 m).The common limb will be therefore about 2/3 of total small bowel length.
Standardization of the techniques will be guaranteed: 1. Mini Gastric Bypass Arm 2. Roux en Y Gastric Bypass arm All patients will have intraoperative measurement of the whole length of bowel from Treitz ligament to the ileocecal junction (expected range 6-8 m).The common limb will be therefore about 2/3 of total small bowel length.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI 40-55 kg/m2
- Non smokers
- Primary Mini Gastric Bypass or Roux en Y Gastric Bypass without any concomitant surgeries except hiatal hernia repair
- Enrollment in the two study groups will be on the basis of patient choice.
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Different bowel measurement (plus or minus 10%).
- Conversion to open surgery, reoperation
- Helicobacter Pylori positive previous or current
- Free PPI 4 weeks before 6th month (after surgery)
- Corticosteroids, vitamine E, fish oil treatment 2 months before surgery
- Anti or pre- biotics treatment 2 months before surgery
- Chronic gastrointestinal diseases or syndromes
- Previous bariatric surgery (intragastric balloon excluded)
- Previous resective bowel surgery
- Previous pancreatic surgery
- Previous Hepato BilioPancreatic surgery
- Gallbladder gallstones
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ICOT Hospital
Latina, 04100, Italy
Related Publications (19)
Milone M, De Placido G, Musella M, Sosa Fernandez LM, Sosa Fernandez LV, Campana G, Di Minno MN, Milone F. Incidence of Successful Pregnancy After Weight Loss Interventions in Infertile Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Obes Surg. 2016 Feb;26(2):443-51. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1998-7.
PMID: 26661108BACKGROUNDMusella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, Ribeiro R, Manno E, Greco F, Cierny M, Milone M, Di Stefano C, Guler S, Van Lessen IM, Guerra A, Maglio MN, Bonfanti R, Novotna R, Coretti G, Piazza L. Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission: the Role of Mini Gastric Bypass/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy at 1 Year of Follow-up. A European survey. Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):933-40. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1865-6.
PMID: 26341086BACKGROUNDCampanile FC, Boru CE, Rizzello M, Puzziello A, Copaescu C, Cavallaro G, Silecchia G. Acute complications after laparoscopic bariatric procedures: update for the general surgeon. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Jun;398(5):669-86. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1077-2. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
PMID: 23519905BACKGROUNDRutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001 Jun;11(3):276-80. doi: 10.1381/096089201321336584.
PMID: 11433900BACKGROUNDRutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005 Oct;15(9):1304-8. doi: 10.1381/096089205774512663.
PMID: 16259892BACKGROUNDAlexandrou A, Davis PA, Law S, Whooley BP, Murthy SC, Wong J. Esophageal cancer in patients with a history of distal gastrectomy. Arch Surg. 2002 Nov;137(11):1238-42. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.11.1238.
PMID: 12413309BACKGROUNDLee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, Tsou JJ, Chen SC, Chen JC. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012 Dec;22(12):1827-34. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0726-9.
PMID: 23011462BACKGROUNDBruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, Guenzi M, Berger A, Chevallier JM. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PMID: 25614356BACKGROUNDNoun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, Daher R, Antoun NA, Nasr M. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012 May;22(5):697-703. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z.
PMID: 22411569BACKGROUNDLee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, Chen SC, Chen JC, Su YH. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.012. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
PMID: 21159561BACKGROUNDWang W, Wei PL, Lee YC, Huang MT, Chiu CC, Lee WJ. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005 May;15(5):648-54. doi: 10.1381/0960892053923752.
PMID: 15946455BACKGROUNDCavin JB, Voitellier E, Cluzeaud F, Kapel N, Marmuse JP, Chevallier JM, Msika S, Bado A, Le Gall M. Malabsorption and intestinal adaptation after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016 Sep 1;311(3):G492-500. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00197.2016. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
PMID: 27418681BACKGROUNDGraessler J, Qin Y, Zhong H, Zhang J, Licinio J, Wong ML, Xu A, Chavakis T, Bornstein AB, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, Lamounier-Zepter V, Lohmann T, Wolf T, Bornstein SR. Metagenomic sequencing of the human gut microbiome before and after bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: correlation with inflammatory and metabolic parameters. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013 Dec;13(6):514-22. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2012.43. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
PMID: 23032991BACKGROUNDTremaroli V, Karlsson F, Werling M, Stahlman M, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Olbers T, Fandriks L, le Roux CW, Nielsen J, Backhed F. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Induce Long-Term Changes on the Human Gut Microbiome Contributing to Fat Mass Regulation. Cell Metab. 2015 Aug 4;22(2):228-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.009.
PMID: 26244932BACKGROUNDLiou AP, Paziuk M, Luevano JM Jr, Machineni S, Turnbaugh PJ, Kaplan LM. Conserved shifts in the gut microbiota due to gastric bypass reduce host weight and adiposity. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Mar 27;5(178):178ra41. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005687.
PMID: 23536013BACKGROUNDPeterson LA, Zeng X, Caufield-Noll CP, Schweitzer MA, Magnuson TH, Steele KE. Vitamin D status and supplementation before and after bariatric surgery: a comprehensive literature review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Mar-Apr;12(3):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PMID: 27036669BACKGROUNDMadan AK, Harper JL, Tichansky DS. Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
PMID: 18069071BACKGROUNDMusella M, Milone M, Deitel M, Kular KS, Rutledge R. What a Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB) Is. Obes Surg. 2016 Jun;26(6):1322-3. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2168-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 27091050BACKGROUNDDonini LM, Brunani A, Sirtori A, Savina C, Tempera S, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G, Cimolin V, Precilios H, Raggi A, Capodaglio P; SIO-ISDCA Task Force. Assessing disability in morbidly obese individuals: the Italian Society of Obesity test for obesity-related disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2509-18. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.575529. Epub 2011 May 4.
PMID: 21542694BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gianfranco Silecchia, MD PhD
University of Roma La Sapienza
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD Prof. G. Silecchia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2017
First Posted
January 26, 2018
Study Start
March 21, 2018
Primary Completion
February 19, 2020
Study Completion
November 19, 2020
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04