NCT03410823

Brief Summary

Hip fracture is a common problem among older individuals. The goal of current standard of care after hip fracture is to achieve independent, household ambulation 2-3 months after surgery, yet decreased functional ability typically persists well beyond three months and many patients never resume independent ambulation outside the home. Previous research has established that one must be able to walk at least 300 meters (\~330 yards) within 6 minutes to re-establish routine interactions in the community, such as going to the store or to church. In part, this is based on the average distance from handicapped parking spaces into most facilities. Activity and exercise are believed to be of benefit for reducing disability in older adults, yet the majority of older adults does not participate in regular exercise and is not active. This is especially true for older adults following hip fracture after they complete the usual rehabilitation program. This research study is being done to test a 16-week, multi-part exercise intervention for hip fracture patients that will be supervised by specially trained physical therapists (PTs). The exercise intervention uses a novel machine to provide strength and endurance training in the home. This has been shown in smaller studies to be safe and effective at increasing strength. The purpose of this small pilot study is to test whether adding a protein supplement to the exercise intervention leads to more improvements in a person's ability to walk in their own home and in the local community. With this knowledge, investigators hope to help a greater number of hip fracture patients enjoy a more complete recovery and improved overall health. In addition to providing important information on adherence, feasibility, and safety, this pilot study of hip fracture patients has the unique advantage of being able to compare data to two recently completed studies where participants received the PUSH intervention without protein supplementation.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 16, 2018

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 12, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 12, 2020

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 26, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2017

Results QC Date

May 17, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 1, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

hip fractureexerciseprotein

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Distance Walked in Six Minutes

    The Six-Minute Walk Test (SMWT) will be used to obtain a continuous measure of total distance walked in six minutes. The SMWT is highly correlated with workloads, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and dyspnea responses when compared to bicycle ergometry and treadmill exercise tests in older persons. It has been performed by elderly, frail and severely compromised participants who cannot perform standard maximal treadmill or cycle ergometry exercise tests.

    16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (19)

  • Cognitive Function (3MS)

    16 weeks

  • Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    16 weeks

  • Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)

    16 weeks

  • Quality of Life (SF-36)

    16 weeks

  • Nutritional Status

    16 weeks

  • +14 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Adherence With PUSH Intervention

    16 weeks

  • Adherence With Protein Supplement

    16 weeks

Study Arms (1)

PUSH Plus Protein and Nutrition

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be given a whey-based protein supplement containing 27.6g of protein daily for 16 weeks and receive the PUSH intervention. PUSH is a specific multi-component intervention based on improving specific precursors to community ambulation. The intervention addresses endurance with continuous upright exercise for 20 min.; function by improving fast walking, standing from a chair, and stair negotiation; muscle performance by exercising to enhance lower extremity strength; and balance by performing unilateral activities and activities with decreased base of support. Participants receive 32 visits of approximately 60 minutes in duration from a study PT. Participants will receive two visits a week, on non-consecutive days, for 16 weeks. Visits take place in the participant's place of residence. Participants also receive the nutritional intervention for the duration of the 16-week study.

Behavioral: PUSHDietary Supplement: ProteinDietary Supplement: Nutrition

Interventions

PUSHBEHAVIORAL

Strength components of the muscle performance intervention are performed using a portable progressive resistive exercise device (Shuttle® MiniPress, Contemporary Design Company, P.O. Box 5089, Glacier, Washington 98244). Muscle performance focuses on bilateral hip extensors, hip abductors, knee extensors, and plantar flexors. Balance and strength are addressed with additional exercises performed while standing. The endurance intervention begins with 2-3 minutes of continuous upper and lower extremity active range of motion (AROM) with the participant sitting in order to increase the participants' heart rate (HR) or exertion closer to the target zone. The participant is then asked to walk on level surfaces and/or up and down steps to keep the HR within the training zone for 20 minutes.

PUSH Plus Protein and Nutrition
ProteinDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Participants will receive a whey-based protein supplement in the form of a powder containing 27.6g of protein. This dose induces maximum muscle protein synthesis post-exercise. Participants will mix the supplement in 8 oz of water (or other beverage) or soft food (e.g., yogurt, soup) and consume immediately following each exercise session with the study PT. On days when they do not have a physical therapy visit with the study PT, participants will be instructed to take the supplement at the meal time closest to the time of scheduled PT visits to maintain regular daily dosing schedule.

PUSH Plus Protein and Nutrition
NutritionDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Participants receive 2000 IU vitamin D3, 600 mg calcium, and a multivitamin daily for the duration of the study. Nutritional counseling is also provided. Participants are screened at baseline to assess nutritional risk using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form and contacted by a registered dietician (RD) within 7 days of baseline testing Those who score ≤7 (malnourished) and participants with baseline serum albumin 2.5-3.5 g/dl receive a visit from an RD with follow-up a week later. Participants who score 8-11 (at risk of malnutrition) and have serum albumin level \>3.5 g/dl receive a phone call from the RD and may receive an in-person visit if warranted. Those screening in the normal range (12-14) and have serum albumin level \>3.5 g/dl receive a phone call from the RD. Weight is monitored every 4 weeks. Those who lose 2% or more body weight receive a call from the RD. Those who lose 5% or more body weight between baseline and follow-up may be referred to an RD.

PUSH Plus Protein and Nutrition

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Closed fracture of proximal femur
  • Age 60 or older at time of baseline testing
  • Minimal trauma fracture
  • Non-pathologic fracture
  • Surgical fixation of fracture
  • Living in the community at time of fracture
  • Ambulating without human assistance 2 months prior to fracture
  • Unable to walk 300 m or more in 6 minutes without human assistance at time of baseline testing

You may not qualify if:

  • Not English speaking
  • Does not live within reasonable distance of the clinical center
  • End stage renal disease on dialysis
  • Recent myocardial infarction
  • Uncompensated congestive heart failure
  • Lower extremity amputation
  • Symptoms of angina pectoris
  • Chest pain or shortness of breath (including from severe COPD)
  • Participant plans to move out of area or otherwise be unavailable during the 16-week intervention period
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Not community-residing (e.g., resident of a skilled nursing facility) at time of baseline testing
  • Not fully weight-bearing on fractured leg or non-fractured leg at time of baseline testing
  • Calculated creatinine clearance \< 15 ml/min
  • Serum albumin \< 2.5 g/dl
  • Hemoglobin \< 9 g/dl
  • +18 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

University of Maryland - St. Joseph Medical Center

Towson, Maryland, 21204, United States

Location

Related Publications (31)

  • Sallinen J, Pakarinen A, Fogelholm M, Alen M, Volek JS, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Dietary intake, serum hormones, muscle mass and strength during strength training in 49 - 73-year-old men. Int J Sports Med. 2007 Dec;28(12):1070-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965003. Epub 2007 May 11.

    PMID: 17497592BACKGROUND
  • Sallinen J, Pakarinen A, Fogelholm M, Sillanpaa E, Alen M, Volek JS, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Serum basal hormone concentrations and muscle mass in aging women: effects of strength training and diet. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Jun;16(3):316-31. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.16.3.316.

    PMID: 16948487BACKGROUND
  • Chesley A, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Atkinson SA, Smith K. Changes in human muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Oct;73(4):1383-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.4.1383.

    PMID: 1280254BACKGROUND
  • Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Aarsland A, Wolf SE, Wolfe RR. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1997 Jul;273(1 Pt 1):E99-107. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.E99.

    PMID: 9252485BACKGROUND
  • Wolfe RR. Skeletal muscle protein metabolism and resistance exercise. J Nutr. 2006 Feb;136(2):525S-528S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.2.525S.

    PMID: 16424140BACKGROUND
  • Borsheim E, Tipton KD, Wolf SE, Wolfe RR. Essential amino acids and muscle protein recovery from resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Oct;283(4):E648-57. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00466.2001.

    PMID: 12217881BACKGROUND
  • Rasmussen BB, Tipton KD, Miller SL, Wolf SE, Wolfe RR. An oral essential amino acid-carbohydrate supplement enhances muscle protein anabolism after resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Feb;88(2):386-92. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.2.386.

    PMID: 10658002BACKGROUND
  • Esmarck B, Andersen JL, Olsen S, Richter EA, Mizuno M, Kjaer M. Timing of postexercise protein intake is important for muscle hypertrophy with resistance training in elderly humans. J Physiol. 2001 Aug 15;535(Pt 1):301-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00301.x.

    PMID: 11507179BACKGROUND
  • Norton LE, Layman DK. Leucine regulates translation initiation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle after exercise. J Nutr. 2006 Feb;136(2):533S-537S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.2.533S.

    PMID: 16424142BACKGROUND
  • Jackman SR, Witard OC, Jeukendrup AE, Tipton KD. Branched-chain amino acid ingestion can ameliorate soreness from eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 May;42(5):962-70. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c1b798.

    PMID: 19997002BACKGROUND
  • Matsumoto K, Koba T, Hamada K, Sakurai M, Higuchi T, Miyata H. Branched-chain amino acid supplementation attenuates muscle soreness, muscle damage and inflammation during an intensive training program. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009 Dec;49(4):424-31.

    PMID: 20087302BACKGROUND
  • Verdijk LB, Jonkers RA, Gleeson BG, Beelen M, Meijer K, Savelberg HH, Wodzig WK, Dendale P, van Loon LJ. Protein supplementation before and after exercise does not further augment skeletal muscle hypertrophy after resistance training in elderly men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Feb;89(2):608-16. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26626. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

    PMID: 19106243BACKGROUND
  • Campbell WW, Leidy HJ. Dietary protein and resistance training effects on muscle and body composition in older persons. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007 Dec;26(6):696S-703S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719650.

    PMID: 18187436BACKGROUND
  • Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Brismar K, Soderqvist A, Cederholm T. Nutritional status, insulin-like growth factor-1 and quality of life in elderly women with hip fractures. Clin Nutr. 1999 Aug;18(4):241-6. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(99)80076-4.

    PMID: 10578024BACKGROUND
  • Lumbers M, New SA, Gibson S, Murphy MC. Nutritional status in elderly female hip fracture patients: comparison with an age-matched home living group attending day centres. Br J Nutr. 2001 Jun;85(6):733-40. doi: 10.1079/bjn2001350.

    PMID: 11430778BACKGROUND
  • Conigrave AD, Brown EM, Rizzoli R. Dietary protein and bone health: roles of amino acid-sensing receptors in the control of calcium metabolism and bone homeostasis. Annu Rev Nutr. 2008;28:131-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155328.

    PMID: 18466091BACKGROUND
  • Darling AL, Millward DJ, Torgerson DJ, Hewitt CE, Lanham-New SA. Dietary protein and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1674-92. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27799. Epub 2009 Nov 4.

    PMID: 19889822BACKGROUND
  • Tkatch L, Rapin CH, Rizzoli R, Slosman D, Nydegger V, Vasey H, Bonjour JP. Benefits of oral protein supplementation in elderly patients with fracture of the proximal femur. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992 Oct;11(5):519-25. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1992.10718256.

    PMID: 1452950BACKGROUND
  • Schurch MA, Rizzoli R, Slosman D, Vadas L, Vergnaud P, Bonjour JP. Protein supplements increase serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels and attenuate proximal femur bone loss in patients with recent hip fracture. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998 May 15;128(10):801-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00002.

    PMID: 9599191BACKGROUND
  • Cuthbertson D, Smith K, Babraj J, Leese G, Waddell T, Atherton P, Wackerhage H, Taylor PM, Rennie MJ. Anabolic signaling deficits underlie amino acid resistance of wasting, aging muscle. FASEB J. 2005 Mar;19(3):422-4. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2640fje. Epub 2004 Dec 13.

    PMID: 15596483BACKGROUND
  • Ryan AS, Dobrovolny CL, Smith GV, Silver KH, Macko RF. Hemiparetic muscle atrophy and increased intramuscular fat in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;83(12):1703-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.36399.

    PMID: 12474173BACKGROUND
  • Goodpaster BH, Carlson CL, Visser M, Kelley DE, Scherzinger A, Harris TB, Stamm E, Newman AB. Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: The Health ABC Study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Jun;90(6):2157-65. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2157.

    PMID: 11356778BACKGROUND
  • Mourtada FA, Beck TJ, Hauser DL, Ruff CB, Bao G. Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry. J Orthop Res. 1996 May;14(3):483-92. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100140319.

    PMID: 8676262BACKGROUND
  • Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WW Jr, Rao GU. Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. Invest Radiol. 1990 Jan;25(1):6-18. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199001000-00004.

    PMID: 2298552BACKGROUND
  • Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: The Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev. 1996 Jan;54(1 Pt 2):S59-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8919685BACKGROUND
  • Wells JL, Dumbrell AC. Nutrition and aging: assessment and treatment of compromised nutritional status in frail elderly patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1(1):67-79. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2006.1.1.67.

    PMID: 18047259BACKGROUND
  • Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, Albarede JL. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition. 1999 Feb;15(2):116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00171-3.

    PMID: 9990575BACKGROUND
  • Sato T, Matsuyama Y. Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization. Epidemiology. 2003 Nov;14(6):680-6. doi: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000081989.82616.7d.

    PMID: 14569183BACKGROUND
  • Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):757-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00064.

    PMID: 9382394BACKGROUND
  • Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):743-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x.

    PMID: 16696738BACKGROUND
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip FracturesMotor Activity

Interventions

ProteinsNutritional Status

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg InjuriesBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Amino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsNutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaHealth StatusDemographyPopulation Characteristics

Limitations and Caveats

The PUSH + Protein Pilot study was originally powered for 30 participants. However, due to the extended COVID-19 shutdown, the study was terminated early with a smaller sample size of 12 included in the analyses. As a result, we did not analyze all of the secondary outcomes originally planned. Since the pilot study provided important feasibility data for using protein supplement in older hip fracture patients, data analyses were conducted on the primary outcome and a few key secondary outcomes.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Denise Orwig
Organization
University of Maryland School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Jay Magaziner, PhD, MSHyg

    University of Maryland, Baltimore

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2017

First Posted

January 25, 2018

Study Start

July 16, 2018

Primary Completion

December 12, 2020

Study Completion

December 12, 2020

Last Updated

November 26, 2024

Results First Posted

November 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations