Gerontology Research Programme: The Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies (SLAS I & II)
SLAS
1 other identifier
observational
6,183
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Gerontology Research Programme (GRP) in the National University Singapore's Department of Psychological Medicine, was formed to coordinate and facilitate the conduct of multi-disciplinary research on in a wide range of research on ageing and health. The establishment of the Singapore Longitudinal Aging Cohort will provide a large community-based cohort of elderly subjects for observational studies with useful clinical applications. Research synergy is achieved in terms of pooling multi-disciplinary expertise, and combining genetic, biological, environmental, behavioural, social, clinical, and health services approaches to gerontological research.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2003
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedMarch 14, 2019
March 1, 2019
17.5 years
October 26, 2017
March 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Subtyping (Clinical diagnosis of different stages of Dementia)
Dementia and MCI is determined by clinical case conference adjudication where geriatric and psychiatric clinicians convene to determine the diagnosis of a case, utilizing the data from (i) Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (4-5); (ii) Clinical Dementia rating scale: a 5-point scale used to characterize 6 cognitive and functional domain performance: Memory, Orientation, Judgment \& Problem Solving, Community Affairs, Home \& Hobbies, and Personal Care (6). Information to make each rating is obtained through a semi-structured interview of the patient and a reliable informant (e.g. family member). A higher score indicates increased severity of cognitive impairment; (iii) Informant Questionnaire of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) - reliable informants report on the cognitive state of the participant (7); (iv) a scale on self-reported subjective cognitive difficulties; and (v) a neuropsychological assessment battery (described below).
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Global and specific domain cognitive functioning ability (Measuring of Global and Specific domain of Cognitive functions)
MMSE (4) and MoCA (5) - 30 items, total scores range from 0-30, higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. A cut-off of a score of =\<25 is determined as screening positive for cognitive impairment. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) (8) - measures immediate memory, visuospatial ability, language, attention, delayed memory, and a global cognitive functioning score (a summation of domain scores). A neurocognitive battery measures immediate and delayed memory/learning, visuospatial ability, language, attention, and executive functioning. All domains are calculated by weighted averages of age and education adjusted scores. Tests: (i) Digit Span forward and backwards tasks (9); (ii) Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (10); (iii) Story Memory Test (11); (iv) Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (12); (v) Boston Naming Test (13); (vi) Clock Reading Test; (viii) Colour Trials 1 and 2 (14); (ix) Block Design task (9).
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Frailty (Measuring the physical and Cognitive Frailty)
Physical frailty was assessed by scores (1 = present, 0 = absent) for five components (shrinking, weakness, slowness, exhaustion, and low Physical Activity (PA)) proposed by Fried et al (3), with the following operational modifications: (i) Shrinking was defined by unintentional weight loss of 4 kg or more in the past 6 months, or BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2, or calf circumference of 31 cm or less. (ii) Weakness was assessed by knee extension strength task in kilogram. (iii) Slowness was assessed by a gait speed test (15). (iv) Exhaustion was measured as a summed score of 3 questions (1-5), "Did you have lots of energy/feel tired (reverse-scored, rs)/worn out (rs)?" (16). A score of \<10 was used to denote exhaustion. (v) Low PA was measured by the LASA PA scale, with those falling below the local gender-specific lowest quintile deemed as low PA (17). Participants are categorised by their total scores as robust (score = 0), pre-frail (score = 1-2), and frail (score = 3-5).
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Depressive symptoms and diagnosis (Measuring of Depressive symptoms and assessment of stages of Depression)
Depressive symptoms are assessed by the 15-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), with a higher score indicating higher depressivity (18). A cut-off score of 5 is used as indicating the presence of depression. Additionally, participants are formally diagnosed by a medically trained research fellow for common mood-related psychiatric conditions using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID) of DSM IV-TR (1), such as Major Depressive Disorder, Minor Depression, Dysthmic Disorder, Mania/Hypomania disorder, Anxiety and panic disorder, Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Post traumatic stress disorder, Psychotic disorder, Mood disorder due to a General Medical Condition and Alcohol abuse disorders, if they screen as positive for depression on the GDS.
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Successful ageing (Measuring the biological, psycho-social and lifestyle factors associated with Successful Ageing)
Successful aging is previously defined (25). Briefly, a score of successful ageing reflects the overall and physical health, cognitive, emotional, social well-functioning, including life engagement \& satisfaction. Physical health and functional well-being was defined as a "good/excellent" self-reported health and IADL independence (20). Cognitive well-functioning and emotional wellbeing was denoted by a minimum MMSE score of 26 (4), and a score below 5 on the GDS (≤5) (18). Social functioning and active engagement in life activities was assessed using a validated questionnaire (26) on participation levels in social, recreational, civic activities, voluntary work, employment/business, and domestic activities. Overall positive life satisfaction was determined using the Life Satisfaction Scale that assessed interest in life, happiness, loneliness, and general ease of living (27). Total summed score ranges from 4 to 18, with the lowest decile indicating a positive life satisfaction.
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Self-reported independent functioning (Measuring the BADL and IADL)
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Physical performance (Measuring the physical performance tests)
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Health services utilization (Measuring cost and frequency of health services utilization)
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Quality of life (Measuring the Quality of life SF 12)
20 years - once every 3-4 years
Mortality (Measuring the risk factors related to mortality)
20 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SLAS 1
The subjects (N=2800) are recruited from all residents aged 55 years and above in Singapore in the areas covered by the South-East Community Development Council: Geylang, Aljunied, MacPherson, Marine Parade and Bedok (SLAS-I).
SLAS 2
An additional 3200 subjects are recruited from residents in the Bukit Merah and Jurong (SLAS-II).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Community-dwelling Elderly (\>55 years old) that are able to self-ambulate and who possess sufficient cognitive capacity for participation. Individuals with severe physical or mental disabilities were excluded.
You may qualify if:
- Ability to self-ambulate
- Adequate cognitive capacity for participation
You may not qualify if:
- \- Individuals with severe physical or mental disabilities were excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National University of Singaporelead
- Karolinska Institutetcollaborator
- Tan Tock Seng Hospitalcollaborator
- Ng Teng Fong General Hospitalcollaborator
- St Luke's Hospital, Singaporecollaborator
- St. Paul's Hospital, Canadacollaborator
- Singapore Institute of Technologycollaborator
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical Schoolcollaborator
- Melbourne Healthcollaborator
- University of Californiacollaborator
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerlandcollaborator
- Université de Sherbrookecollaborator
- University Hospital Tuebingencollaborator
- National University Hospital, Singaporecollaborator
- Khoo Teck Puat Hospitalcollaborator
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicinecollaborator
- University of British Columbiacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
National University of Singapore
Singapore, 119260, Singapore
Related Publications (28)
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of Mental Disorders, (4th ed., text rev.; DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association, Washington. 2000.
BACKGROUNDPortet F, Ousset PJ, Visser PJ, Frisoni GB, Nobili F, Scheltens P, Vellas B, Touchon J; MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer's Disease (EADC). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in medical practice: a critical review of the concept and new diagnostic procedure. Report of the MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer's Disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;77(6):714-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.085332. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
PMID: 16549412BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR, Fanjiang G. Mini-Mental State Examination: MMSE user's guide. Psychology Assessment Resources; 2000.
BACKGROUNDNasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
PMID: 15817019BACKGROUNDO'Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, Hall J, Lacritz L, Massman PJ, Lupo PJ, Reisch JS, Doody R; Texas Alzheimer's Research Consortium. Staging dementia using Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes scores: a Texas Alzheimer's research consortium study. Arch Neurol. 2008 Aug;65(8):1091-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.8.1091.
PMID: 18695059BACKGROUNDJorm AF. A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation. Psychol Med. 1994 Feb;24(1):145-53. doi: 10.1017/s003329170002691x.
PMID: 8208879BACKGROUNDRandolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Jun;20(3):310-9. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823.
PMID: 9845158BACKGROUNDWechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation Google Scholar; 2008.
BACKGROUNDRey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique.(Les problems.). Archives de psychologie (1941).
BACKGROUNDYeo D, Gabriel C, Chen C, Lee S, Loenneker T, Wong M. Pilot validation of a customized neuropsychological battery in elderly Singaporeans. Neurol J South East Asia 1997 2(123).
BACKGROUNDBenedict RHB. Brief visuospatial memory test - revised: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 1997.
BACKGROUNDKaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston naming test. Pro-ed; 2001.
BACKGROUNDD'Elia LF, Satz P, Uchiyama CL, White T. Color Trails Test: Professional Manual. Odessa (Florida): Psychological Assessment Resources; 1996.
BACKGROUNDKluger A, Gianutsos JG, Golomb J, Wagner A Jr, Wagner D, Scheurich S. Clinical features of MCI: motor changes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Feb;20(1):32-9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610207006461.
PMID: 18072982BACKGROUNDWare JE, Keller SD, Kosinski M. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric; 1998.
BACKGROUNDSiebeling L, Wiebers S, Beem L, Puhan MA, Ter Riet G. Validity and reproducibility of a physical activity questionnaire for older adults: questionnaire versus accelerometer for assessing physical activity in older adults. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:171-80. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S30848. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
PMID: 22866018BACKGROUNDVinkers DJ, Gussekloo J, Stek ML, Westendorp RG, Van Der Mast RC. The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) detects changes in depressive symptoms after a major negative life event. The Leiden 85-plus Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;19(1):80-4. doi: 10.1002/gps.1043.
PMID: 14716703BACKGROUNDMAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 14258950BACKGROUNDLawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
PMID: 5349366BACKGROUNDTinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R. Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med. 1986 Mar;80(3):429-34. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90717-5.
PMID: 3953620BACKGROUNDTinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Feb;34(2):119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 3944402BACKGROUNDRabin R, Oemar M, Oppe M, Janssen B, Herdman M. EQ-5D-3L User Guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument. Rotterdam: EuroQol Group; 2011.
BACKGROUNDWare JE, Kolinski M, Keller SD. How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summaries: A User's Manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston, MA; 1995.
BACKGROUNDNg TP, Broekman BF, Niti M, Gwee X, Kua EH. Determinants of successful aging using a multidimensional definition among Chinese elderly in Singapore. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 May;17(5):407-16. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31819a808e.
PMID: 19390298BACKGROUNDNiti M, Yap KB, Kua EH, Tan CH, Ng TP. Physical, social and productive leisure activities, cognitive decline and interaction with APOE-epsilon 4 genotype in Chinese older adults. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Apr;20(2):237-51. doi: 10.1017/S1041610207006655. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
PMID: 18190728BACKGROUNDKoivumaa-Honkanen H, Honkanen R, Viinamaki H, Heikkila K, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M. Self-reported life satisfaction and 20-year mortality in healthy Finnish adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Nov 15;152(10):983-91. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.10.983.
PMID: 11092440BACKGROUNDNg TP, Lee TS, Lim WS, Chong MS, Yap P, Cheong CY, Rawtaer I, Liew TM, Gwee X, Gao Q, Yap KB. Functional mobility decline and incident mild cognitive impairment and early dementia in community-dwelling older adults: the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study. Age Ageing. 2022 Sep 2;51(9):afac182. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac182.
PMID: 36074716DERIVED
Biospecimen
Biological specimens (blood and urine) will be analyzed for full blood count, lipid panel, liver function test, blood biochemistry, PBMC, DNA, immunological tests (whole blood, serum, plasma).
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tze Pin Ng, PhD
National University of Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professorial Fellow and Research Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2017
First Posted
January 23, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2003
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03