Determining Dietary Pattern Accompanying Egg Intake Using Remote Food Photography Method
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recent epidemiological studies show that egg consumption is associated with insulin resistance and altered glycemic control. For this study, the investigators hypothesize that this association is due to dietary patterns associated with egg consumption, such as saturated fat, and not the consumption of eggs per se. This study will be conducted in two parts that will be conducted simultaneously. Part I will utilize an ecological momentary assessment approach in which dietary patterns associated with egg intake will be determined using an objective measurement of food intake called remote food photography method. In Part II, a randomized partial crossover study will be conducted on the same sample of subjects to test the effects of egg consumption, saturated fat consumption, and consumption of the combination of eggs and saturated fat on glucose, insulin, and hunger and satiety hormone levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started May 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 3, 2018
CompletedJanuary 14, 2019
January 1, 2019
4 months
December 22, 2017
January 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Difference of energy intake (kcal) in meals containing eggs as compared to meals that do not contain eggs
Energy intake will be determined using Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) and the meals of all test subjects will be categorized based on the presence or the absence of eggs in the meals.
Day 1-7 of the ecological momentary assessment part (Part I) of the study
Difference of energy intake (kcal) in high egg consumers as compared to low egg consumers
Comparison of mean daily energy intake as measured by Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) between high egg consumers and low egg consumers identified by providing a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).
Day 1-7 of the ecological momentary assessment part (Part I) of the study
Difference of saturated fat (g) intake in meals containing eggs as compared to meals that do not contain eggs
Saturated fat intake will be determined using Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) and the meals of all test subjects will be categorized based on the presence or the absence of eggs in the meals.
Day 1-7 of the ecological momentary assessment part (Part I) of the study
Difference of saturated fat (g) intake in high egg consumers as compared to low egg consumers
Comparison of saturated fat intake as measured by Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) between high egg consumers and low egg consumers identified by providing a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).
Day 1-7 of the ecological momentary assessment part (Part I) of the study
Difference of blood glucose levels compared between different test breakfasts
This will be measured on visit 1 and 2 after providing test breakfasts.
Changes in concentration (area under the curve; AUC) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
Difference of insulin levels compared between different test breakfasts
This will be measured on visit 1 and 2 after providing test breakfasts.
Changes in concentration (area under the curve; AUC) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Difference of subjective hunger level compared between different test breakfasts
Changes in scores (arbitrary units AU) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
Difference of subjective satiety level compared between different test breakfasts
Changes in scores (arbitrary units AU) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
Difference of objective hunger compared between different test breakfasts
Changes in concentration (area under the curve AUC) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
Difference of objective satiety compared between different test breakfasts using serum Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels
Changes in concentration (area under the curve AUC) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
Difference of objective satiety compared between different test breakfasts using serum Peptide YY (PYY 3-36) levels
Changes in concentration (area under the curve AUC) from 30 minutes prior to breakfast to 180 minutes after consumption of test breakfasts (Part II of the study)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Group 1:Test breakfast A and B
EXPERIMENTAL\*Please note: Part I of the study does not have separate groups. All subjects will undergo RFPM. The description of groups presented below is for part II of the study. Subjects will have egg breakfast(test breakfast A) and egg breakfast with high saturated fat (test breakfast B) in any order.
Group 2:Test breakfast A and C
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have egg breakfast and (test breakfast A) and cereal breakfast (test breakfast C) in any order.
Group 3:Test breakfast A and D
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have egg breakfast (test breakfast A) and cereal breakfast (test breakfast C) in any order.
Group 4:Test breakfast B and C
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have egg breakfast with high saturated fat (test breakfast B) and cereal breakfast (test breakfast C) in any order.
Group 5:Test breakfast B and D
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have egg breakfast with high saturated fat (test breakfast B) and cereal breakfast with high saturated fat (test breakfast D) in any order.
Group 6:Test breakfast C and D
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have cereal breakfast (test breakfast C) and cereal breakfast with high saturated fat (test breakfast D) in any order
Interventions
Containing:2 Scrambled Eggs, 120 mL Skim Milk, 2 Slices Nature's Own Double Fiber Wheat Bread, 30g Margarine, 18g Smuckers Strawberry Jam 10 g of Margarine, 18 g of Smuckers® Strawberry Jam
Containing:2 Scrambled Eggs, 120 mL 2% milk, 2 Slices Nature's Own Double Fiber Wheat Bread, 15 g Butter, 15g Smuckers Strawberry Jam
Containing: 1c Special K ready-to-eat (RTE) High Protein Cereal, 200 mL Silk Original Soy milk, 1 Slice Mrs. Bairds Extra Thin Bread, 35g Margarine, 10 g Smuckers Sugar Free Strawberry Jam
Containing: 1c Special K ready-to-eat (RTE) High Protein Cereal, 200 mL Silk Original Soy milk, 1/2 Slice Arnold Double Protein Whole Grain Bread, 15 g Butter
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- non-diabetic individuals (fasting glucose \< 126 mg/dL)
- Male or female
- BMI from greater or equal to 20 to lesser or equal 60 kg/m2
- Age: 18 - 65 years
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes
- On antidiabetes medication
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Having a history of gestational diabetes
- Having an unstable cardiac condition
- Having a major systemic illness
- Having a history of drug abuse
- Having a history of eating disorders
- Having uncontrolled hypothyroidism
- Having familial hyperlipidemias
- Having allergies sensitivity to or dislike of eggs
- Consumption of \< 1 egg per week
- Attempting to lose weight
- On medications that may influence or inhibit appetite, sensory functioning, or hormone signaling- e.g. antibiotics, anti-depressants, obesity medications. Weight loss \> 5% in the past 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Texas Tech Universitylead
- Pennington Biomedical Research Centercollaborator
- American Egg Boardcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Texas Tech University - Department of Nutritional Sciences
Lubbock, Texas, 79409, United States
Related Publications (6)
Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Ascherio A, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Spiegelman D, Speizer FE, Sacks FM, Hennekens CH, Willett WC. A prospective study of egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women. JAMA. 1999 Apr 21;281(15):1387-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.15.1387.
PMID: 10217054BACKGROUNDShin JY, Xun P, Nakamura Y, He K. Egg consumption in relation to risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jul;98(1):146-59. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.051318. Epub 2013 May 15.
PMID: 23676423BACKGROUNDDjousse L, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Lee IM. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. Diabetes Care. 2009 Feb;32(2):295-300. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1271. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
PMID: 19017774BACKGROUNDWallin A, Forouhi NG, Wolk A, Larsson SC. Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study and dose-response meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2016 Jun;59(6):1204-13. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3923-6. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
PMID: 26993632BACKGROUNDMartin CK, Correa JB, Han H, Allen HR, Rood JC, Champagne CM, Gunturk BK, Bray GA. Validity of the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) for estimating energy and nutrient intake in near real-time. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Apr;20(4):891-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.344. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
PMID: 22134199BACKGROUNDDhanasekara CS, Dawson JA, Martin CK, Dhurandhar NV. No association between consumption of eggs with energy or macronutrient intake: Objective evidence from the remote food photography method. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Jan-Feb;15(1):313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
PMID: 33486223DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2017
First Posted
January 19, 2018
Study Start
May 22, 2018
Primary Completion
October 3, 2018
Study Completion
October 3, 2018
Last Updated
January 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share