BLI800-303: An Efficacy Evaluation of 2 Different Bowel Cleansing Preparations in Adult Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
136
1 country
5
Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of BLI800 vs an FDA approved bowel preparation before colonoscopic examination in adult subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 10, 2010
CompletedNovember 10, 2010
October 1, 2010
3 months
March 5, 2009
September 3, 2010
October 15, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy: Percentage of Patients With Successful Preparations Based on a 4 Point Scale
Blinded colonoscopists rated cleansing quality as either Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor. Scores of Excellent or Good were considered Successful preparations.
2 days
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Assessment of Residual Stool - Cecum
2 days
Assessment of Residual Stool - Ascending Colon
2 days
Assessment of Residual Stool - Transverse Colon
2 days
Assessment of Residual Stool - Descending Colon
2 days
Assessment of Residual Stool - Sigmoid Colon/Rectum
2 days
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Polyethylene glycol 3350 based bowel preparation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPolyethylene glycol 3350 based bowel preparation
BLI800
EXPERIMENTALBLI800
Interventions
Solution for oral administration prior to colonoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female outpatients who are undergoing colonoscopy for a routinely accepted indication.
- At least 18 years of age
- Otherwise in good health, as determined by physical exam and medical history
- If female, and of child-bearing potential, is using an acceptable form of birth control
- Negative urine pregnancy test at screening, if applicable
- In the Investigator's judgment, subject is mentally competent to provide informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with known or suspected ileus, severe ulcerative colitis, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention, bowel perforation, toxic colitis or megacolon.
- Subjects who had previous gastrointestinal surgeries.
- Subjects with known or suspected electrolyte abnormalities such as hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, dehydration, or those secondary to the use of diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
- Subjects with clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities based on Visit 1 laboratory results.
- Subjects with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration.
- Subjects undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and decompression.
- Subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study.
- Subjects of childbearing potential who refuse a pregnancy test.
- Subjects allergic to any preparation components
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, should not be included in the study for any reason, including inability to follow study procedures.
- Subjects who have participated in an investigational surgical, drug, or device study within the past 30 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
University of South Alabama
Mobile, Alabama, 36693, United States
Jupiter Research
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Miami Research Associates
Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Indiana University Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Long Island GI Research Group
Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, Cleveland M. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Aug;72(2):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1054. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
PMID: 20646695DERIVED
Limitations and Caveats
As prespecified in the study protocol, expected prep related side effects (nausea, vomiting, cramping, bloating and overall discomfort) were only documented as AEs if patients rated them severely distressing on the study questionnaire.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John McGowan
- Organization
- Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
John McGowan, MPH
Braintree Laboratories, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2009
First Posted
March 6, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 10, 2010
Results First Posted
November 10, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-10