NCT03402295

Brief Summary

This study compared two main different induction protocols used to treat myeloma eligible patients in Brazil. VCD against CTD.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
311

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 multiple-myeloma

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2009

Typical duration for phase_3 multiple-myeloma

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2009

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2014

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 28, 2017

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

December 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Response rate better than very good partial response after 4 induction cycles

    The primary outcome is to observe the difference response rate between VCD and CTD induction myeloma elegible patient

    Response rate after induction phase - at the end of cycle 4- (28 days each cycle)- time frame trough study completion

Study Arms (2)

Vcd- (Bortezomibe, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 Intra venous or Subcutaneous once a week (D1-8-15-22) 35days cycle Intervention- Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks orally or Intravenously- total dose per cycle was 160mg. Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg- intravenously or orally- total dose monthly Total of four cycles

Drug: Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone

Ctd- Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg intravenously or orally total dose monthly Intervention- Thalidomide 100-200mg orally- daily dose Intervention -Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks each month- total dose per cycle was 160mg Total of four cycles (cycles of 28 each one) 28 days each cycles- total of four cycles

Drug: Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone

Interventions

Comparison between two triple combination chemotherapy that include in different new drugs (bortezomibe e talidomida)

Also known as: Velcade, genuxal, decadron
Ctd- Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasoneVcd- (Bortezomibe, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • multiple myeloma newly diagnose elegible to autologous transplantation Patients submitted to ctd or vcd Myeloma patients newly diagnose \>18yo

You may not qualify if:

  • other chemotherapy induction protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Interventions

BortezomibCyclophosphamideThalidomideDexamethasoneCalcium Dobesilate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Plasma CellNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Boronic AcidsAcids, NoncarboxylicAcidsInorganic ChemicalsBoron CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyrazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhosphoramide MustardsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsPhosphoramidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsPhthalimidesPhthalic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsPiperidonesPiperidinesIsoindolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedBenzenesulfonatesBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicArylsulfonatesArylsulfonic AcidsSulfonic AcidsSulfur AcidsSulfur Compounds

Study Officials

  • Edvan Cusoe, MD

    Federal University of Bahia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Retrospectively compared two different groups of treatments
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assintant Professor of Hematology oncology- Santa Casa de Sao Paulo Medical School

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2017

First Posted

January 18, 2018

Study Start

June 15, 2009

Primary Completion

June 15, 2014

Study Completion

October 15, 2017

Last Updated

January 18, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share