NCT03387267

Brief Summary

The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement will be completed in one day and the subject will be followed within 2 business days after the study procedure to monitor for adverse events.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
452

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
2 countries

13 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 24, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 30, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 2, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 23, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 23, 2018

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 30, 2017

Results QC Date

December 18, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare the DDS Predicted Swallow Safety Outcome (Binary) vs. Clinical Reference Standard VFS for THIN-Ba

    The primary efficacy of the DDS was measured as the sensitivity \& specificity obtained from comparing the DDS predicted swallow safety outcome (binary) with the clinical reference standard VFSS swallow safety outcome (binary) for thin barium (THIN-Ba) stimuli, using 5 boluses per subject protocol. ROC (AUC) was used for comparing the 2 algorithms. The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the outcome. Primary analysis for futility was based on 242 subjects (Interim Analysis). The study was terminated based on futility as the AUC for primary endpoint (0.64) was less than the guiding futility bound of 0.75.

    The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using thin barium (THIN-Ba) was completed in one day for each subject.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • AUC Under ROC Curve to Compare the DDS Predicted Swallow Safety Outcome (Binary) vs. Clinical Reference Standard VFS for MILD-Ba

    The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using mild barium (MILD-Ba) was completed in one day for each subject.

  • AUC Under ROC Curve to Compare the DDS Predicted Swallow Safety Outcome (Binary) vs. Clinical Reference Standard VFS for MOD-Ba

    The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using MOD-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.

  • The Sensitivity & Specificity for Swallow Efficiency Using THIN-Ba

    The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using THIN-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.

  • The Sensitivity & Specificity for Swallow Efficiency Using MILD-Ba

    The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using MILD-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.

  • The Sensitivity & Specificity for Swallow Efficiency Using MOD-Ba

    The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using MOD-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.

Study Arms (1)

single-arm Dysphagia Detection System

OTHER

An operationally seamless single-arm, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded for central outcomes assessors trial to test DDS in assessing swallowing safety and efficiency in patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Device: Dysphagia Detection System

Interventions

The Nestle Health Sciences (NHSc) Dysphagia Detection System (DDS) is a portable, non-invasive device designed for use at the bedside. The investigational DDS has 3 basic components: Sensor Unit (suspended on a necklace), Sensor Fixation and a personal computer (PC) for collecting data. The Sensor Unit consists of a dual-axis accelerometer in a plastic housing that is attached to the front of a patient's neck just below the thyroid cartilage by the single-use, disposable fixation unit. The Sensor Unit is connected via a cable to an A/D converter which then connects via cable to the PC. The PC collects the examination data, which is then sent to dedicated application software (installed at the CRO), which interprets the acceleration data and displays the examination result.

single-arm Dysphagia Detection System

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult subjects (over 18 years of age)
  • Hospitalized subjects or outpatients identified as at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia (using local practice)
  • Patients belong to one of the following groups:
  • Stroke patients
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Parkinson Disease (PD) stage III or higher by Hoehn and Yahr scale
  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS) above age 60
  • Alzheimer Disease (AD) or other Dementia

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject is able to comply with VFSS protocol to diagnose dysphagia
  • Subject is able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in the clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained / or a consultee has consented on he subjects behalf in line with nationally agreed guidelines concerning adults unable to consent for themselves.
  • Presence of nasogastric / nasojejunal feeding tube at the time of VFSS test
  • Currently has a tracheostomy, or has had a tracheostomy in the past year
  • Had posterior cervical spine surgery and/or carotid endarterectomy in the last 6 months
  • Had significant surgery to the mouth and/or neck, for example resection for oral or pharyngeal cancer, radical neck dissection, anterior cervical spine surgery, orofacial reconstruction, pharyngoplasty, or thyroidectomy. Routine tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy are not excluded
  • Experienced non-surgical trauma to the neck (e.g., knife wound) resulting in musculoskeletal or nerve injury in the neck.
  • Received radiation or chemotherapy to the oropharynx or neck for cancer.
  • Allergy to oral radiographic contrast media (specifically barium)
  • Distorted oropharyngeal anatomy (e.g. pharyngeal pouch)
  • Cognitive impairment that prevents them from being able to comply with study instructions and procedures
  • Known to be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Currently has significant facial hair at the location of sensor adherence and are unwilling/unable to be shaved
  • Any patients the local investigator finds that participation would not be in patients' best interest

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Rancho Research Institute, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center

Downey, California, 90242, United States

Location

University of Colorado Denver

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Medstar Rehabilitation Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Marionjoy Rehabilitation Hospital

Wheaton, Illinois, 60187, United States

Location

Kentucky Clinic

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States

Location

Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States

Location

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

The Burke Medical Research Institute

White Plains, New York, 10605, United States

Location

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Helsinki, 00029, Finland

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Clave P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;12(5):259-70. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.49. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

    PMID: 25850008BACKGROUND
  • Altman KW, Yu GP, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;136(8):784-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.129.

    PMID: 20713754BACKGROUND
  • Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S; Stroke Practice Improvement Network Investigators. Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):1972-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000177529.86868.8d. Epub 2005 Aug 18.

    PMID: 16109909BACKGROUND
  • Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DOD Clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(9):1-43. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21213454BACKGROUND
  • Donovan NJ, Daniels SK, Edmiaston J, Weinhardt J, Summers D, Mitchell PH; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council. Dysphagia screening: state of the art: invitational conference proceeding from the State-of-the-Art Nursing Symposium, International Stroke Conference 2012. Stroke. 2013 Apr;44(4):e24-31. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182877f57. Epub 2013 Feb 14. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23412377BACKGROUND
  • O'Horo JC, Rogus-Pulia N, Garcia-Arguello L, Robbins J, Safdar N. Bedside diagnosis of dysphagia: a systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2015 Apr;10(4):256-65. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2313. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

    PMID: 25581840BACKGROUND
  • Kertscher B, Speyer R, Palmieri M, Plant C. Bedside screening to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: an updated systematic review. Dysphagia. 2014 Apr;29(2):204-12. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9490-9. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

    PMID: 24026520BACKGROUND
  • Swets JA. The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. Am Psychol. 1992 Apr;47(4):522-32. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.4.522.

    PMID: 1595983BACKGROUND
  • Zammit-Maempel I, Chapple CL, Leslie P. Radiation dose in videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Dysphagia. 2007 Jan;22(1):13-5. doi: 10.1007/s00455-006-9031-x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.

    PMID: 17024550BACKGROUND
  • Moro L, Cazzani C. Dynamic swallowing study and radiation dose to patients. Radiol Med. 2006 Feb;111(1):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0013-8. English, Italian.

    PMID: 16623312BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeParkinson DiseaseMultiple SclerosisDeglutition DisordersAlzheimer DiseaseDementia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesPharyngeal DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesTauopathiesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kemuel Reyes
Organization
Nestlé Health Science

Study Officials

  • Natalia Muhlemann, MD

    Nestle Health Science

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Richard Harvey, MD

    Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
An operationally seamless single-arm, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded for central outcomes assessors trial to test DDS in assessing swallowing safety and efficiency in patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The clinical trial will initially start as a 3-look group sequential design (GSD). Alpha-spending will be calculated using Lan-DeMets spending function (with O'Brien-Fleming parameter). At the first interim analysis (IA-1) the threshold on the ROC curve may be re-computed using the ROC curve generated using the IA-1 data, in which case, the validation trial would start afresh following IA-1 using a 2-look GSD. Data included in the IA-1 would no longer be used for the validation phase.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2017

First Posted

January 2, 2018

Study Start

October 24, 2017

Primary Completion

July 23, 2018

Study Completion

July 23, 2018

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Results First Posted

May 20, 2021

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations