Study Stopped
Study terminated due to futility
Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS)
PORSCHE
A Prospective Multi-center Study Comparing the Performance of the Dysphagia Detection System (DDS) in Detecting Impaired Swallowing Safety and Efficiency as Compared to the Clinical Reference Method - Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study
1 other identifier
interventional
452
2 countries
13
Brief Summary
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement will be completed in one day and the subject will be followed within 2 business days after the study procedure to monitor for adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2021
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
October 30, 2017
December 18, 2020
December 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare the DDS Predicted Swallow Safety Outcome (Binary) vs. Clinical Reference Standard VFS for THIN-Ba
The primary efficacy of the DDS was measured as the sensitivity \& specificity obtained from comparing the DDS predicted swallow safety outcome (binary) with the clinical reference standard VFSS swallow safety outcome (binary) for thin barium (THIN-Ba) stimuli, using 5 boluses per subject protocol. ROC (AUC) was used for comparing the 2 algorithms. The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the outcome. Primary analysis for futility was based on 242 subjects (Interim Analysis). The study was terminated based on futility as the AUC for primary endpoint (0.64) was less than the guiding futility bound of 0.75.
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using thin barium (THIN-Ba) was completed in one day for each subject.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
AUC Under ROC Curve to Compare the DDS Predicted Swallow Safety Outcome (Binary) vs. Clinical Reference Standard VFS for MILD-Ba
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using mild barium (MILD-Ba) was completed in one day for each subject.
AUC Under ROC Curve to Compare the DDS Predicted Swallow Safety Outcome (Binary) vs. Clinical Reference Standard VFS for MOD-Ba
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using MOD-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.
The Sensitivity & Specificity for Swallow Efficiency Using THIN-Ba
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using THIN-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.
The Sensitivity & Specificity for Swallow Efficiency Using MILD-Ba
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using MILD-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.
The Sensitivity & Specificity for Swallow Efficiency Using MOD-Ba
The study procedure of simultaneous VFSS and DDS measurement using MOD-Ba was completed in one day for each subject.
Study Arms (1)
single-arm Dysphagia Detection System
OTHERAn operationally seamless single-arm, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded for central outcomes assessors trial to test DDS in assessing swallowing safety and efficiency in patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Interventions
The Nestle Health Sciences (NHSc) Dysphagia Detection System (DDS) is a portable, non-invasive device designed for use at the bedside. The investigational DDS has 3 basic components: Sensor Unit (suspended on a necklace), Sensor Fixation and a personal computer (PC) for collecting data. The Sensor Unit consists of a dual-axis accelerometer in a plastic housing that is attached to the front of a patient's neck just below the thyroid cartilage by the single-use, disposable fixation unit. The Sensor Unit is connected via a cable to an A/D converter which then connects via cable to the PC. The PC collects the examination data, which is then sent to dedicated application software (installed at the CRO), which interprets the acceleration data and displays the examination result.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult subjects (over 18 years of age)
- Hospitalized subjects or outpatients identified as at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia (using local practice)
- Patients belong to one of the following groups:
- Stroke patients
- Traumatic brain injury
- Parkinson Disease (PD) stage III or higher by Hoehn and Yahr scale
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS) above age 60
- Alzheimer Disease (AD) or other Dementia
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is able to comply with VFSS protocol to diagnose dysphagia
- Subject is able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in the clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained / or a consultee has consented on he subjects behalf in line with nationally agreed guidelines concerning adults unable to consent for themselves.
- Presence of nasogastric / nasojejunal feeding tube at the time of VFSS test
- Currently has a tracheostomy, or has had a tracheostomy in the past year
- Had posterior cervical spine surgery and/or carotid endarterectomy in the last 6 months
- Had significant surgery to the mouth and/or neck, for example resection for oral or pharyngeal cancer, radical neck dissection, anterior cervical spine surgery, orofacial reconstruction, pharyngoplasty, or thyroidectomy. Routine tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy are not excluded
- Experienced non-surgical trauma to the neck (e.g., knife wound) resulting in musculoskeletal or nerve injury in the neck.
- Received radiation or chemotherapy to the oropharynx or neck for cancer.
- Allergy to oral radiographic contrast media (specifically barium)
- Distorted oropharyngeal anatomy (e.g. pharyngeal pouch)
- Cognitive impairment that prevents them from being able to comply with study instructions and procedures
- Known to be pregnant at the time of enrollment
- Currently has significant facial hair at the location of sensor adherence and are unwilling/unable to be shaved
- Any patients the local investigator finds that participation would not be in patients' best interest
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)lead
- Cytel Inc.collaborator
- Regulatory and Clinical Research Institute Inccollaborator
- Nestec Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (13)
Rancho Research Institute, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center
Downey, California, 90242, United States
University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Medstar Rehabilitation Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Marionjoy Rehabilitation Hospital
Wheaton, Illinois, 60187, United States
Kentucky Clinic
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10021, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
The Burke Medical Research Institute
White Plains, New York, 10605, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, 00029, Finland
Related Publications (10)
Clave P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;12(5):259-70. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.49. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PMID: 25850008BACKGROUNDAltman KW, Yu GP, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;136(8):784-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.129.
PMID: 20713754BACKGROUNDHinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S; Stroke Practice Improvement Network Investigators. Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):1972-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000177529.86868.8d. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
PMID: 16109909BACKGROUNDManagement of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DOD Clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(9):1-43. No abstract available.
PMID: 21213454BACKGROUNDDonovan NJ, Daniels SK, Edmiaston J, Weinhardt J, Summers D, Mitchell PH; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council. Dysphagia screening: state of the art: invitational conference proceeding from the State-of-the-Art Nursing Symposium, International Stroke Conference 2012. Stroke. 2013 Apr;44(4):e24-31. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182877f57. Epub 2013 Feb 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 23412377BACKGROUNDO'Horo JC, Rogus-Pulia N, Garcia-Arguello L, Robbins J, Safdar N. Bedside diagnosis of dysphagia: a systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2015 Apr;10(4):256-65. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2313. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
PMID: 25581840BACKGROUNDKertscher B, Speyer R, Palmieri M, Plant C. Bedside screening to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: an updated systematic review. Dysphagia. 2014 Apr;29(2):204-12. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9490-9. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
PMID: 24026520BACKGROUNDSwets JA. The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. Am Psychol. 1992 Apr;47(4):522-32. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.4.522.
PMID: 1595983BACKGROUNDZammit-Maempel I, Chapple CL, Leslie P. Radiation dose in videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Dysphagia. 2007 Jan;22(1):13-5. doi: 10.1007/s00455-006-9031-x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
PMID: 17024550BACKGROUNDMoro L, Cazzani C. Dynamic swallowing study and radiation dose to patients. Radiol Med. 2006 Feb;111(1):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0013-8. English, Italian.
PMID: 16623312BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kemuel Reyes
- Organization
- Nestlé Health Science
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Natalia Muhlemann, MD
Nestle Health Science
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Harvey, MD
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- An operationally seamless single-arm, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded for central outcomes assessors trial to test DDS in assessing swallowing safety and efficiency in patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia.
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2017
First Posted
January 2, 2018
Study Start
October 24, 2017
Primary Completion
July 23, 2018
Study Completion
July 23, 2018
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Results First Posted
May 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share