Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced 3- and 4-part Proximal Humeral Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries with the highest incidence being amongst the elderly. Most proximal humeral fractures are nondisplaced or minimally displaced. The majority of these are reliably treated nonoperatively with an acceptable functional outcome. The treatment of displaced fractures is more controversial. Consensus is lacking as to when surgery is indicated or what type of procedure to choose if surgery is elected. Displaced 3- and 4-part fractures where internal fixation is deemed unreliable have been considered an indication for hemiarthroplasty. Hemiarthroplasty gives reasonable control of pain but the resulting shoulder function and range of motion is unpredictable. The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is increasing and might result in a better range of motion then hemiarthroplasty. The aim of this multicenter study is to test the hypothesis that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty gives better shoulder function than hemiarthroplasty for displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2020
CompletedSeptember 2, 2020
September 1, 2020
7 years
December 14, 2017
September 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Constant-Murley Score
The Constant-Murley score is used to assess shoulder function. The maximum score is 100 points. Higher scores represent better shoulder function.
24 months
WOOS (Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder) Index
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
EXPERIMENTALHemiarthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Displaced 3- or 4-part fracture of the proximal humerus
- Age over 70 years
- Independent living
- Low energy trauma
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing shoulder disease
- Severe cognitive dysfunction
- More than 14 days from injury to surgery
- Comorbidity that affects shoulder rehabilitation considerably
- Concurrent injury that affect shoulder rehabilitation considerably
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.
PMID: 35727196DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Per Olerud, MD
Karolinska Institutet
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carl Ekholm, MD
Sahlgrenska Academy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Senior Consulting Orthopedic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2017
First Posted
December 27, 2017
Study Start
September 10, 2013
Primary Completion
September 2, 2020
Study Completion
September 2, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09