NCT02075476

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two surgical techniques for the treatments of proximal extremity humeral fractures and fractures luxation in three o four fragments of Neer's classification.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2014

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 5, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 6, 2016

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

February 6, 2014

Results QC Date

March 3, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Fracture-luxationhumeral proximal extremityHemiarthroplastyreverse Arthroplasty

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Effectiveness Will be Measured for AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW (ASES) Score

    changes en ASES (AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW) score will be measured. The ASES questionnaire is composed of both a physician-rated component and a patient-reported component. The patient questions focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living. This questionary includes a section on pain (7 items) and a section on activities of daily living (10 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition.

    36 months

  • Effectiveness Will be Measured for Constant Score

    changes in Constant score will be measured. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The Constant-Murley score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function.

    36 months

  • Effectiveness Will be Measured for DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Score

    changes in DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score will be measured. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patient's health status during the previous week. The items enquire about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of arm, shoulder and hand problems (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (five items) and the impact of the problem on social functioning, work, sleep and self-image (four items). Each item has five response options. The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)

    36 months

Study Arms (2)

Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

in this technique the prosthesis is implanted in similar approach to shoulder anatomy

Procedure: Hemiarthroplasty

reverse arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy)

EXPERIMENTAL

In this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy

Procedure: reverse arthroplasty

Interventions

Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy)
reverse arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy)

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with humeral proximal extremity fracture or fracture luxation in three or four fragments of Neer's classification.
  • Patient 70 years older
  • Signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any condition to make worse the functional recovery or avoid the patient collaboration with the rehabilitation program ( cognitive disability, neurological pathology…)
  • Glenohumeral osteoarthritis
  • Inflammatory arthropathies
  • Previous cuff arthropatyy
  • High surgical or anesthesia risk

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, 28007, Spain

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Hemiarthroplasty

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Carlos Álvarez
Organization
Hospital Gregorio Marañón

Study Officials

  • Carlos Alvarez, MD

    Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2014

First Posted

March 3, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 5, 2015

Study Completion

August 6, 2016

Last Updated

April 14, 2020

Results First Posted

April 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Locations