Effectiveness Between Two Surgical Techniques for Reconstruction of Humeral Proximal Extremity Fractures
Prospective, Randomized and Double Blind Study of Parallels Groups for Evaluating the Effectiveness Between Two Surgical Techniques for Reconstruction of Humeral Proximal Extremity Fractures in Three or Four Fragments
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two surgical techniques for the treatments of proximal extremity humeral fractures and fractures luxation in three o four fragments of Neer's classification.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 6, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 14, 2020
CompletedApril 14, 2020
April 1, 2020
2.3 years
February 6, 2014
March 3, 2020
April 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Effectiveness Will be Measured for AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW (ASES) Score
changes en ASES (AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW) score will be measured. The ASES questionnaire is composed of both a physician-rated component and a patient-reported component. The patient questions focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living. This questionary includes a section on pain (7 items) and a section on activities of daily living (10 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition.
36 months
Effectiveness Will be Measured for Constant Score
changes in Constant score will be measured. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient. The Constant-Murley score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function.
36 months
Effectiveness Will be Measured for DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Score
changes in DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score will be measured. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure is a 30-item, self-report questionnaire designed to assess the patient's health status during the previous week. The items enquire about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of arm, shoulder and hand problems (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (five items) and the impact of the problem on social functioning, work, sleep and self-image (four items). Each item has five response options. The scores are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability)
36 months
Study Arms (2)
Hemiarthroplasty Global Fx(DePuy)
ACTIVE COMPARATORin this technique the prosthesis is implanted in similar approach to shoulder anatomy
reverse arthroplasty Delta Xtent(DePuy)
EXPERIMENTALIn this technique the prosthesis is implanted in the inverse mode of shoulder anatomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with humeral proximal extremity fracture or fracture luxation in three or four fragments of Neer's classification.
- Patient 70 years older
- Signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Any condition to make worse the functional recovery or avoid the patient collaboration with the rehabilitation program ( cognitive disability, neurological pathology…)
- Glenohumeral osteoarthritis
- Inflammatory arthropathies
- Previous cuff arthropatyy
- High surgical or anesthesia risk
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carlos Alvarezlead
Study Sites (1)
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, 28007, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.
PMID: 35727196DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Carlos Álvarez
- Organization
- Hospital Gregorio Marañón
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Alvarez, MD
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2014
First Posted
March 3, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 5, 2015
Study Completion
August 6, 2016
Last Updated
April 14, 2020
Results First Posted
April 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04