Intrauterine Device Insertion: a Step for High Satisfaction
Ultrasound-guided Approach Versus Uterine Sound-sparing Approach for Intrauterine Device Insertion a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The intrauterine device is a safe, reliable and long-acting reversible contraceptive method. Instrumentation of lower genital mucosa during intrauterine device application provokes pain because it is highly sensitive to touch. Fear of pain associated with intrauterine device insertion is considered a barrier to use this contraception method. The classic insertion instructions recommend performing bimanual examination and uterine sounding prior to intrauterine device insertion in order to confirm proper determination of uterine size and position. The pain during intrauterine device insertion could be due to cervical grasping by the tenaculum, traction on the cervical canal, stretching of the internal os by the uterine sound or the intrauterine device inserter, and lastly by irritation of the endometrial lining by the intrauterine device. Many studies investigated the use of various analgesics in different doses and routes of administration and found out that it has a significant impact on relieving of associated pain Some technical modifications have been emerged in trial to decrease pain during intrauterine device insertion. One of them is trans-abdominal ultrasound guided intrauterine device insertion which the participant with a full bladder is subjected to intrauterine device insertion under ultrasonographic guide without using tenaculum. This method effectively decreased the pain and time of intrauterine device insertion. A recent method named "Uterine Sounding Sparing Approach" has been reported very recently in literature by Ali et al., 2017. In this method; the sonographer performs T transvaginal ultrasound to evaluate the uterine position and the endometrial length in the sagittal view of the uterus. The intrauterine device was inserted directly into the uterine cavity without using uterine sounding. In spite of less pain reported by trans-abdominal ultrasound guided intrauterine device insertion (no vulsellum was used), this methods also have some drawbacks, firstly; the full bladder may displace the cervix upward making the intrauterine device application not quite easy and secondly; this method needs two investigators which may distress the women who wondering about this. These two drawbacks may decrease patient's and physician's satisfaction. The uterine sounding sparing approach lacks these two drawbacks which make it more satisfying. From above evidence, there is a strong need to compare the satisfaction rate between the two mentioned approaches in trial to answer this question. Up to our knowledge; no randomized trial has been conducted or registered to compare the satisfaction rate between two above approaches.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 10, 2021
February 1, 2021
1 year
December 19, 2017
February 6, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Level of satisfaction of patients in both groups (satisfaction score)
Measured by visual analogue like scale from 0 to 10
5 minutes after intrauterine device insertion
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Level of reported pain (visual analogue scale )
5 minutes after intrauterine device insertion
Study Arms (2)
Trans-abdominal ultrasound intrauterine device group.
OTHERThose will be subjected to intrauterine device insertion under trans-abdominal ultrasound guidance. In this method the participant will be asked to have a full bladder. Full bladder helps to displace the bowel out of the pelvis and acts as an acoustic window for high frequency sound waves and to straighten the angle between the uterine body and cervix in anteverted uterus, performing the function of the tenaculum. Then, then ultrasound will be done and the intrauterine device will be introduced vaginally under ultrasound vision.
Uterine Sounding Sparing intrauterine device group
OTHERThe sonographer performs ultrasound using transvaginal probe to evaluate the uterine position and the endometrial length in the sagittal view of the uterus. The intrauterine device was inserted directly into the uterine cavity without using uterine sounding.
Interventions
Copper T 380 A
we will insert intrauterine device without using the uterine sound and we will replace this step by ultrasound before insertion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 18-49 years
- Nonpregnant
- Women did not receive any analgesics or misoprostol in the 24 hours prior to insertion.
You may not qualify if:
- Women with any uterine abnormalities such as congenital anomalies, endometrial lesions, fibroids
- Allergy to Copper.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Women Health Hospital - Assiut university
Asyut, 71111, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2017
First Posted
December 26, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02