Different Positive Pressure Strategies in COPD Patients.
Regional Ventilation and Radioaerosol Pulmonary Deposition Through Different Positive Pressure Strategies in COPD Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a poorly reversible airway obstruction and consequent systemic manifestations. Its high prevalence and high number of diagnosed patients has become a challenge for health services due to the costs of diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Positive pressure and aerosol therapy are preferred therapies for the management of COPD symptoms, but their effects when associated are poorly studied. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of different positive pressure strategies associated with aerosol therapy through Pulmonary Scintigraphy and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in patients with COPD in the intercrise period. This is a randomized, crossover, blinded and allocated crossover type clinical trial in which patients with moderate to severe COPD will be allocated to three intervention groups with different strategies for positive pressure associated with aerosol therapy: control group 1 nebulization), group 2 nebulization with EPAP valve and group 3 nebulization with NIV bi-level pressure mode. The radioaerosol deposition pattern will be evaluated through Pulmonary Scintigraphy and regional pulmonary ventilation through EIT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedJuly 31, 2018
July 1, 2018
2 months
December 6, 2017
July 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change of Pulmonary Function
Pulmonary function test performed through spirometry
30 minutes after intervention
Change of Aerosol deposition in the lungs
The pulmonary deposition index (PPI), expressed in percentage terms and obtained by the ratio of the number of counts of each ROI to the total number of counts of the respective lung.
Immediately after intervention
Change of Regional pulmonary ventilation
The impedance variation (AZ) and regional pulmonary ventilation (ZEE) will be evaluated for each region of interest.
30 minutes after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change of Ventilatory pattern
30 minutes after intervention
Change of Heart Rate
30 minutes after intervention
Change of Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
Immediately and 30 minutes after intervention
Study Arms (3)
Nebulization
EXPERIMENTALcontrol intervention, will only perform nebulization;
Positive expiratory pressure valve
EXPERIMENTALIntervention, will perform nebulization associated with positive expiratory pressure valve in the airways (EPAP)
Nonivasive ventilation
EXPERIMENTALintervention, will perform nebulization associated with non-invasive ventilation Bi-level mode;
Interventions
For inhalation of the radioaerosol a dose of DTPA-Tc99m (methionine-labeled diethylnitriaminepentaacetic acid) with 1mCi activity, associated with 10 drops of Fenoterol Bromide and 20 drops of Ipatropium Bromide diluted for a total of up to 3 ml of saline solution 0.9%. A MESH vibrating nebulizer (NIVO, Philips Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania) will be used.
For nebulization associated with the EPAP valve will be used a non-invasive distribution system consisting of a non-toxic orofacial mask connected to a spring loaded EPAP valve. This mask will be secured to the patient's face through tabs in order to prevent leakage and to maintain proper pressurizing and better patient adaptation.
For nebulization associated with NIV, a noninvasive distribution system consisting of a non-toxic orofacial mask connected to the NIV circuit will be used, and the latter will be being fed by a radioaerosol flow generated by a nebulizer coupled to the circuit. This mask will be secured to the patient's face through tabs in order to prevent leakage and to maintain proper pressurizing and better patient adaptation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with stage II (moderate) and III (severe) COPD according to the guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)
You may not qualify if:
- unable to understand or perform procedures that present rheumatic or orthopedic diseases or deformities / abnormalities in the spine that compromise the mechanics of the respiratory system; respiratory comorbidities such as asthma, bronchiectasis and sequela of tuberculosis, cardiovascular and neurological comorbidities; hemodynamic instability defined as heart rate greater than 150 bpm, or systolic pressure less than 90 mmHg; hypertension (blood pressure\> 149/89 mmHg) or hypotension (blood pressure \<90/60 mmHg) at the time of collection; pregnancy or suspected pregnancy; and any contraindications for the use of PEP.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Recife, Pernambuco, 50670-901, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catarina Rattes
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Two experienced researchers will participate in the study, one being responsible for the evaluation of the outcomes (researcher 1) and the other responsible for the application of the intervention in each patient (researcher 2). The researcher 2 will receive in opaque and sealed envelopes the randomized order of the interventions of each patient, keeping them in secrecy until the end of the whole study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2017
First Posted
December 22, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 16, 2018
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share