NCT03381001

Brief Summary

The transfer of frozen / thawed embryos has been routinely performed in the last 30 years as part of Assisted Reproduction treatment (ART). Currently, more than 50% of couples submitted to ART have surplus embryos eligible for freezing followed by transfer in subsequent cycles. Therefore the selection criteria for the thawed embryos to be transferred must be rigorous in order to maximize pregnancy and of live birth rates. Usually, the evaluation of the embryos before transfer can be performed based on blastomeres survival after a short culture period between thaw and embryos transfer, i.e., 2 to 5 hours, or based on embryo development over a prolonged period of culture (18h to 24h). Post-thaw embryo culture might have an impact on the recovery of mitosis and normal cellular functions. However, until now, there is no consensus in the literature on which post-thaw culture interval has a better impact on pregnancy and live birth rates. Also, blastocysts formation after freezing/thawing of embryos at cleavage stage may bring relevant information about post-thaw culture. Moreover, this strategy can be used as an alternative treatment. Therefore, the authors proposed this prospective randomized, triple-blind study to evaluate the impact of post-thaw embryo culture on the pregnancy and live birth rates.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
268

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 11, 2017

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 21, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 10, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 11, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

cryopreservationhuman embryosvitrificationembryo cultureembryo transferpregnancy rate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • pregnancy rates

    percentage of patients that become pregnant after Frozen embryo transfer

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • implantation rate

    6 weeks

  • embryo development

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

embryo transfer after embryo thaw

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Embryos will be transferred at the same day of the thawing procedure

Procedure: embryo transfer with no culture

embryo transfer after thaw and culture

EXPERIMENTAL

Embryos will be transferred one day after thawing procedure

Procedure: embryo transfer after thaw and culture

Interventions

embryos will be kept in culture after thawing for one day before transfer for the uterus

embryo transfer after thaw and culture

embryos will be transfer with no culture after thaw

embryo transfer after embryo thaw

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailsonly women can have an embryo transfer
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients submitted to ART treatment due to infertility that had frozen embryos and need an embryo transfer after endometrial preparation and embryo thawing

You may not qualify if:

  • patients that does not reach criteria for frozen embryo transfer (thin endometrium, bleeding, inappropriate use of hormones)
  • difficult embryo transfer
  • embryos that were frozen twice

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital das Clinicas - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130100, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, Checa MA. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

  • Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Cost-Effectiveness of the Freeze-All Policy. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015 Aug 1;19(3):125-30. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150028.

  • Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1190-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.045. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

  • Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all cycle for all normal responders? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Feb;34(2):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0834-x. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

  • Roque M, Valle M, Kostolias A, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all cycle in reproductive medicine: current perspectives. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Feb 1;21(1):49-53. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170012.

  • Colodetti L, Pinho de Franca P, Sampaio M, Geber S. Do different culture intervals (2 x 24 hours) after thaw of cleavage stage embryos affect pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial. Cryobiology. 2020 Aug;95:80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Interventions

Culture TechniquesEmbryo Transfer

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital DiseasesUrogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

In Vitro TechniquesInvestigative TechniquesReproductive Techniques, AssistedReproductive TechniquesTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • selmo Geber, MD PhD

    Federal University of Minas Gerais

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective, randomized, triple-blinded study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2017

First Posted

December 21, 2017

Study Start

June 15, 2017

Primary Completion

June 15, 2019

Study Completion

August 10, 2019

Last Updated

August 14, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

we don't have permission to share participant data

Locations