Influence of Post-thaw Embryo Culture Interval on Assisted Reproduction Success Rates
1 other identifier
interventional
268
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The transfer of frozen / thawed embryos has been routinely performed in the last 30 years as part of Assisted Reproduction treatment (ART). Currently, more than 50% of couples submitted to ART have surplus embryos eligible for freezing followed by transfer in subsequent cycles. Therefore the selection criteria for the thawed embryos to be transferred must be rigorous in order to maximize pregnancy and of live birth rates. Usually, the evaluation of the embryos before transfer can be performed based on blastomeres survival after a short culture period between thaw and embryos transfer, i.e., 2 to 5 hours, or based on embryo development over a prolonged period of culture (18h to 24h). Post-thaw embryo culture might have an impact on the recovery of mitosis and normal cellular functions. However, until now, there is no consensus in the literature on which post-thaw culture interval has a better impact on pregnancy and live birth rates. Also, blastocysts formation after freezing/thawing of embryos at cleavage stage may bring relevant information about post-thaw culture. Moreover, this strategy can be used as an alternative treatment. Therefore, the authors proposed this prospective randomized, triple-blind study to evaluate the impact of post-thaw embryo culture on the pregnancy and live birth rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2019
CompletedAugust 14, 2019
August 1, 2019
2 years
December 11, 2017
August 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pregnancy rates
percentage of patients that become pregnant after Frozen embryo transfer
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
implantation rate
6 weeks
embryo development
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
embryo transfer after embryo thaw
ACTIVE COMPARATOREmbryos will be transferred at the same day of the thawing procedure
embryo transfer after thaw and culture
EXPERIMENTALEmbryos will be transferred one day after thawing procedure
Interventions
embryos will be kept in culture after thawing for one day before transfer for the uterus
embryos will be transfer with no culture after thaw
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients submitted to ART treatment due to infertility that had frozen embryos and need an embryo transfer after endometrial preparation and embryo thawing
You may not qualify if:
- patients that does not reach criteria for frozen embryo transfer (thin endometrium, bleeding, inappropriate use of hormones)
- difficult embryo transfer
- embryos that were frozen twice
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clinicas - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130100, Brazil
Related Publications (6)
Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, Checa MA. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
PMID: 23040524RESULTRoque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Cost-Effectiveness of the Freeze-All Policy. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015 Aug 1;19(3):125-30. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150028.
PMID: 27203090RESULTRoque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1190-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.045. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
PMID: 25747130RESULTRoque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all cycle for all normal responders? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Feb;34(2):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0834-x. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
PMID: 27817036RESULTRoque M, Valle M, Kostolias A, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all cycle in reproductive medicine: current perspectives. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Feb 1;21(1):49-53. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170012.
PMID: 28333033RESULTColodetti L, Pinho de Franca P, Sampaio M, Geber S. Do different culture intervals (2 x 24 hours) after thaw of cleavage stage embryos affect pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial. Cryobiology. 2020 Aug;95:80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
PMID: 32533985DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
selmo Geber, MD PhD
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2017
First Posted
December 21, 2017
Study Start
June 15, 2017
Primary Completion
June 15, 2019
Study Completion
August 10, 2019
Last Updated
August 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
we don't have permission to share participant data