Cumulative Live Birth Rate With eSET After Preimplantation Genetic Screening Versus Conventional In-vitro Fertilization
CESE-PGS
1 other identifier
interventional
1,215
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety with transfer of embryos selected by next generation sequencing (NGS) versus conventional morphological criteria. Subjects with 3 or more blastocysts on day 5 of embryo culture will be randomized to the PGS or IVF group. A Freeze-all strategy and a single frozen blastocyst transfer will be performed in both PGS and IVF groups. The primary outcome is the cumulative live birth after transfers of up to 3 single blastocycsts in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 20, 2019
September 1, 2019
2.9 years
March 27, 2017
September 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative live birth rate
Live birth is defined as the delivery of any viable infant at 28 weeks or more of gestation after our interventions, and cumulative live birth rate is calculated by dividing the number of women achieving live birth after transfers of all study-specific embryos (up to 3 transfers of single blastocycst within 1 year after randomization), by the total number of women randomized to the specific group.
22 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Rate of Good Birth Outcomes
22 months
Cumulative pregnancy rate
14 months
Cumulative pregnancy loss rate
19 months
Multiple pregnancy rate
22 months
Duration of pregnancy
22 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Clinical pregnancy rate after the first transfer
4 months
Pregnancy loss rate after the first transfer
9 months
Live birth rate after the first transfer
12 months
Study Arms (2)
PGS group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in the PGS group will have blastocyst biopsy and sequencing done with 3 good-quality embryos on Day 5. Principle of freeze-all and single thawed blastocyst transfer will be applied. The transfer order of euploid embryos will be determined by blastocyst morphologic score. The outcome of all euploids transfers within 1 year after randomization will be followed up. During study, every subject will have at most one live birth.
IVF group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in the IVF group will also comply with the principle of freeze-all and single thawed blastocyst transfer. The order of transfer will be determined by blastocyst morphologic score. The outcome of up to 3 transfers within 1 year after randomization will be followed up. During study, every subject will have at most one live birth.
Interventions
Blastocysts will be scored by Gardner morphologic criteria.
Three blastocysts will be biopsied on trophectoderm, sequenced with next-generation sequencing (NGS). Euploidy will transferred one by one according to morphologic score.
All blastocysts will be vitrified in fresh cycle. Single blastocyst will be thawed and transferred.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women who are participating in their first cycle of IVF or ICSI
- Women ages 20 to 37 years.
- Women who obtain 3 or more good-quality blastocysts defined as morphological score of inner cell mass B or A, trophectoderm C or better, and grade 4 or better on day 5 of embryo culture will be randomized.
You may not qualify if:
- Women with a uterine cavity abnormality, such as a uterine congenital malformation (uterus uni-cornate, bicornate, or duplex); untreated uterine septum, adenomyosis, submucous myoma, or endo-metrial polyp(s); or with history of intrauterine adhesions.
- Women with untreated hydrosalpinx;
- Women who are indicated and planned to undergo PGD, for example, parental abnormal karyo-type or diagnosed with monogenic disease;
- Women who use donated oocytes or sperm to achieve pregnancy;
- Women with contraindication for assisted reproductive technology or for pregnancy, such as poorly controlled Type I or Type II diabetes; undiagnosed liver disease or dysfunction (based on se-rum liver enzyme testing); renal disease or abnormal serum renal function; significant anemia; history of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, or cerebrovascular accident; uncontrolled hyper-tension, known symptomatic heart disease; history of or suspected cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, or breast carcinoma; undiagnosed vaginal bleeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chen Zi-Jianglead
- The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical Universitycollaborator
- Peking University Third Hospitalcollaborator
- ShangHai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institutecollaborator
- RenJi Hospitalcollaborator
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen Universitycollaborator
- Suzhou Municipal Hospitalcollaborator
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan Universitycollaborator
- Yantai Yuhuangding Hospitalcollaborator
- Tang-Du Hospitalcollaborator
- Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospitalcollaborator
- Guangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospitalcollaborator
- Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang Universitycollaborator
- Guangdong Women and Children Hospitalcollaborator
- Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetricscollaborator
- Shengjing Hospitalcollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Related Publications (12)
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015 Dec;104(6):1503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26385405BACKGROUNDForman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Jul;100(1):100-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
PMID: 23548942BACKGROUNDYang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, Peck AC, Sills ES, Salem RD. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012 May 2;5(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24.
PMID: 22551456BACKGROUNDScott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, Tao X, Treff NR. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
PMID: 23731996BACKGROUNDMurugappan G, Ohno MS, Lathi RB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of preimplantation genetic screening and in vitro fertilization versus expectant management in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2015 May;103(5):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
PMID: 25772770BACKGROUNDMastenbroek S, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future. Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1846-50. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu163. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
PMID: 25006207BACKGROUNDHuang J, Yan L, Lu S, Zhao N, Xie XS, Qiao J. Validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.040. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
PMID: 26902859BACKGROUNDGuo L, Guo A, Lan X, Tian S, Sun F, Su Y, Chen ZJ, Cao Y, Li Y. Oligoasthenospermia is correlated with increased preeclampsia incidence in subfertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. F S Sci. 2024 Nov;5(4):386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.xfss.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
PMID: 39153572DERIVEDNi T, Zhou W, Liu Y, Cui W, Liu Y, Lu J, Zhang Q, Chen ZJ, Li Y, Yan J. Excessive Exogenous Gonadotropins and Genetic and Pregnancy Outcomes After Euploidy Embryo Transfer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4438.
PMID: 38564220DERIVEDHu M, Liu M, Tian S, Guo L, Zang Z, Chen ZJ, Li Y. Comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and conventional in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a stratified examination on the basis of the quantity of oocytes and blastocysts from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2024 Jul;122(1):121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.023. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
PMID: 38367687DERIVEDYan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R, Sun X, Ling X, Li H, Hao C, Tan J, Yang J, Zhu Y, Liu F, Chen D, Wei D, Lu J, Ni T, Zhou W, Wu K, Gao Y, Shi Y, Lu Y, Zhang T, Wu W, Ma X, Ma H, Fu J, Zhang J, Meng Q, Zhang H, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2047-2058. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103613.
PMID: 34818479DERIVEDCornelisse S, Zagers M, Kostova E, Fleischer K, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3.
PMID: 32898291DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2017
First Posted
April 18, 2017
Study Start
July 9, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09