Monitor-Guided Analgesia During General Anesthesia - Part II
MOGADA-II
Investigation of the Effect of Opioid Titration Guided by Analgesia Indices During Total Intravenous Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized clinical trial evaluates the effects of a monitor-guided opioid analgesia during general anesthesia. To date no standard-monitoring device exists to specifically reflect the analgesic component of general anesthesia. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and should be improved by limiting the opioid analgesic's dosage to the minimum amount needed. The study compares the effects of monitoring nociception during general anesthesia with different innovative techniques in comparison to routine clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 7, 2018
CompletedApril 30, 2019
April 1, 2019
4 months
November 29, 2017
April 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative opioid consumption
Compares the amount of intraoperative opioid administration (remifentanil) per minute of general anesthesia and per kg bodyweight between groups.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time to extubation
1 day
Time to Fit-for-discharge
1 day
Postoperative pain level
1 day
Postoperative opioid administration
1 day
Patient satisfaction
2-21 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
PPI (Pain Pupillary Index)
EXPERIMENTALOpioid administration (remifentanil) in intervention group is guided by PPI derived from video-pupillometry performed with the AlgiScan™ by IDMed, Marseille, France. The device measures the degree of pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) following a nociceptive stimulation. It automatically increases the intensity of the electric stimulation from 10 to 60 mA and displays the PPI as numerical index between 0 and 10. A low PPI score indicates deep, a high score light analgesia. A PPI score of 2-3 is supposed to represent an optimal level of analgesia. A remifentanil bolus of 30 µg will be administered and the infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.03 µg/kg/min if PPI score is calculated more than 3. Remifentanil infusion will be decreased by 0.03 µg/kg/min if PPI score is \<1.
SPI (Surgical Pleth Index)
EXPERIMENTALOpioid administration (remifentanil) in intervention group is guided by SPI derived from photoplethysmography performed by the device CARESCAPE™ B650 Patient Monitor by GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland. Included in the monitoring system is a software that continuously calculates the SPI from normalized heart rate and pulse wave amplitude derived from finger plethysmography. The numerical index ranges between 0 (low sympathetic tone) and 100 (high sympathetic tone). A SPI score between 20 and 50 has been proposed as the target range. A remifentanil bolus of 30 µg will be administered and the infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.03 µg/kg/min if SPI score is calculated more than 50. Remifentanil infusion will be decreased by 0.03 µg/kg/min if PPI score is calculated below 20.
NOL (Nociception Level)
EXPERIMENTALOpioid administration (remifentanil) in intervention group is guided by NOL derived from finger photoplethysmography performed with the device PMD200™ manufactured by Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel. The device continuously calculates the NOL with a multi-parametric approach from pulse rate, pulse rate variability, pulse wave amplitude, skin conductance level and fluctuations, skin temperature and finger motion. It is presented on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). A NOL score between 10 and 25 has been proposed as the target range. A remifentanil bolus of 30 µg will be administered and the infusion rate will be increased by 0.03 µg/kg/min if NOL score is calculated more than 25. Remifentanil infusion will be decreased by 0.03 µg/kg/min if PPI score is calculated below 10.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpioid administration (remifentanil) in control group is guided according to standard clinical practice of the attending anesthesiologist based upon changes of heart rate, blood pressure, lacrimation and sweating of the patient.
Interventions
Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration (remifentanil) is guided by analgesia indices during general anesthesia in the experimental arms.
Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration (remifentanil) is guided by clinical signs in the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Radical open abdominal prostatectomy scheduled in the operation theater where the study is conducted
- \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic opioid therapy
- Beta blocker and digitalis therapy
- Eye disease with affection of pupil reactivity
- Pacemaker therapy
- Higher degrees of cardiac arrhythmias, e.g. atrial fibrillation
- Pre-operative medication with steroids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Funcke S, Pinnschmidt HO, Brinkmann C, Wesseler S, Beyer B, Fischer M, Nitzschke R. Nociception level-guided opioid administration in radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):516-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.051. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
PMID: 33228979DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rainer Nitzschke, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sandra Funcke, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants are not informed about the group assignement (intervention takes place in general anesthesia). Outcome assessors are persons without knowledge on former treatment in intervention/control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2017
First Posted
December 21, 2017
Study Start
December 8, 2017
Primary Completion
April 18, 2018
Study Completion
June 7, 2018
Last Updated
April 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data will be anonymized before publication.