Monitor-Guided Analgesia During General Anesthesia - Part I
MOGADA
Investigation of the Effect of Opioid Titration Guided by Analgesia Indices During General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized clinical trial evaluates the effects of a monitor-guided opioid analgesia during general anesthesia. To date no standard-monitoring device exists to specifically reflect the analgesic component of general anesthesia. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and should be improved by limiting the opioid analgesic's dosage to the minimum amount needed. The study compares the effects of monitoring nociception during general anesthesia with different innovative techniques in comparison to routine clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 26, 2018
CompletedApril 25, 2018
April 1, 2018
2 months
August 28, 2017
April 24, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative opioid consumption
Compares the amount of intraoperative opioid administration (sufentanil) per minute of general anesthesia and per kg bodyweight between groups.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time to extubation
1 day
Time to fit-for-discharge
1 day
Postoperative pain level
1 day
Postoperative opioid administration
1 day
Patient satisfaction
2-21 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
PPI (Pain Pupillary Index)
EXPERIMENTALOpioid administration guided by Pain Pupillary Index (PPI) derived from Videopupillometry performed with the device AlgiScan manufactured by IDMed, Marseille, France. The device measures the degree of pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) following an electric nociceptive stimulation. It automatically increases the intensity of the electric stimulation from 10 to 60 milliampere depending on the degree of PRD and afterwards displays the PPI. The numerical index ranges from 0 to 10. A low PPI score indicates a deep analgesia, a high PPI score indicates an insufficient or light analgesia. A PPI score of 2 or 3 is supposed to represent an optimal level of analgesia according to the manufacturer. 5 µg sufentanil will be administered every 5 minutes if PPI score is calculated more than 3.
SPI (Surgical Pleth Index)
EXPERIMENTALOpioid administration (sufentanil) guided by by Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) derived from photoplethysmography performed by the device CARESCAPE B650 Patient Monitor from the manufacturer GE (General Electrics) Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland. Included in the monitoring system is a software that continuously calculates the SPI from normalized heart rate and pulse wave amplitude derived from finger plethysmography. The numerical index ranges between 0 (low sympathetic tone) and 100 (high sympathetic tone). A SPI score between 20 and 50 has been proposed as the target range to guide analgesics (15 - 17). 5 µg Sufentanil will be administered every 5 minutes if SPI score is calculated more than 50.
NOL (Nociception Level)
EXPERIMENTALOpioid administration (sufentanil) guided by Nociception Level (NOL) derived from finger photoplethysmography performed with the analgesia monitoring device PMD200 manufactured by Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel. The device continuously calculates the NOL with a multi-parametric approach from pulse rate, pulse rate variability, pulse wave amplitude, skin conductance level, skin conductance fluctuations, skin temperature and finger motion. The composite algorithm of the device analyses the data and the numerical index NOL is presented on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain) (18). A NOL score between 10 and 25 has been proposed as the target range to guide analgesics. 5 µg Sufentanil will be administered every 5 minutes if NOL score is calculated more than 25.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpioid administration (sufentanil) guided according to standard clinical practice of the attending anesthesiologist based upon changes of heart rate, blood pressure, lacrimation and sweating of the patient.
Interventions
Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by analgesia indices during general anesthesia in the experimental arms.
Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by clinical signs in the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Radical open abdominal prostatectomy scheduled in the operation theater where the study is conducted
- \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic pain therapy, e.g. out-of-hospital opioid therapy
- Beta blocker and digitalis therapy
- Eye disease with affection of pupil reactivity
- Pacemaker therapy
- Higher degrees of cardiac arrhythmias, e.g. atrial fibrillation
- Pre-operative medication with steroids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center
Hamburg, 20257, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rainer Nitzschke, MD
Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sandra Funcke, MD
Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants are not informed about the group assignement (intervention takes place in general anesthesia). Outcome assessors are persons without knowledge on former treatment in intervention/control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2017
First Posted
October 6, 2017
Study Start
October 16, 2017
Primary Completion
December 5, 2017
Study Completion
January 26, 2018
Last Updated
April 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All data will be anonymized before publication.