PCA vs Non-PCA Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration for Severe Cancer Pain
Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) vs Non-PCA Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration for Severe Cancer Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center, Phase III Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
214
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A large number of studies have shown that patients feel more satisfied with hydromorphone in the pain management. and a systematic review found that hydromorphone may be better suited than morphine for titration of acute analgesia. However, current researches on intravenous opioid titration for cancer pain such as hydromorphone are relatively insufficient in China. Therefore, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of comparing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus non-PCA intravenous hydromorphone titration for severe cancer pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2020
CompletedMarch 8, 2021
April 1, 2020
1.2 years
December 13, 2017
March 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The time of successful titration in 24 hours
The satisfied pain control was defined NRS pain score ≤ 3 at rest in at least 2 consecutive assessment (15 minutes interval). The time needed to successful titration was extended to achieve satisfied pain control again if NRS pain score ≥ 7 after satisfied pain control within 24 hours. The failure of successful titration was defined that satisfied pain control does not achieve within 24 hours.
In 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The percentage of patients titrated successfully within 60 minutes
Up to 60 minutes
The percentage of patients titrated successfully within 24 hours
Up to 24 hours
The mean NRS pain score of 24 hours
Up to 24 hours
The total dose of hydromorphone titrated from start of titration to TST
Up to 24 hours
The total dose of hydromorphone titrated within 24 hrs
Up to 24 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PCA IV Hydromorphone titration
EXPERIMENTALPCA titration using programmable pump: bolus hydromorphone at 0.5mg (for opioid intolerance) or hydromorphone dose equivalent to 10% to 20% of the total opioid taken in the previous 24 hours with a lockout time 15 min (for opioid tolerance) was administered by the patients educated. No basal infusion was set in the pump.Repeated assessment of NRS score with a interval of 15 minutes until stable pain control. Then Repeated assessment of NRS score with a interval of 1 hour. The titration will be done on the patient's request (manipulation by the patient himelf/herself) in 24hrs.
non-PCA IV Hydromorphone titration
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-PCA titration administered by a nurse or clinician: Initial hydromorphone doses were same with PCA titration. Repeated assessment of NRS score with a interval of 15 minutes until stable pain control. Then Repeated assessment of NRS score with a interval of 1 hour. The dose of hydromorphone increased by 50%-100% if pain unchanged or increased, or repeat same dose if pain decrease to 4-6. The titration will be done on the patient's request (manipulation by a nurse) in 24hrs.
Interventions
1. For opioid-intolerant patients: continuous infusion of hydromorphone 0 mg per hour, and a demand dose of 0.5 mg with a lockout interval of 15 minutes. 2. For opioid-tolerant patients: basal rate 0 mg per hour, and a demand dose of 10% of the hydromorphone dose equivalent to the total opioid taken in the previous 24 hrs with a lockout interval of 15 minutes.
1. For opioid-intolerant patients: initial dose 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. 2. For opioid-tolerant patients: intravenous hydromorphone with a initial dose equivalent to 10%(5-15%) of the total opioid taken in the previous 24 hrs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- With written informed consent signed voluntarily by patients themselves.
- Cancer patients aged 18-70 years old.
- Patients with cancer pain more than or equal to NRS 7 during previous 24 hours.
- Patients who will not be treated with radiotherapy within 7 days prior to randomization and during study.
- Patients who need chemotherapy, long term administration of hormone, targeted therapy, or bisphosphonates therapy should undergo a stable anti- tumor therapy prior to randomization.
- Patients or his/her caregivers who are able to fill out the questionnaire forms.
- Ability to correctly understand and cooperate with medication guidance of doctors and nurses.
- Without a history of anaphylaxis of narcotic drugs.
- Without psychiatric problems.
- ECOG performance status ≤3.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with non-cancer pain or unexplained pain.
- Patients suffered with post-op pain.
- Patients having paralytic ileus.
- Patients who have hypersensitivity to hydromorphone.
- There are abnormal lab results, with obvious clinical significance, such as the creatinine ≥ 2 fold of upper limit of normal value, or ALT or AST ≥ 2.5 fold of upper limit of normal value (≥ 5 fold,to the patients with liver metastasis or primary liver cancer), or liver function of Child C grade.
- Patients having a incoercible Nausea and vomiting.
- Monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) was administrated two week before randomization.
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating,who plans to be pregnant within one month after the trial(including male).
- Patients who are opioid abuse.
- Patients who are alcohol abuse.
- Patients who are cognitive dysfunction.
- Patients having a severe psychotic depression.
- Patients with any other medical condition or reason, in that investigator's opinion, makes the patient unable to participate in a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rongbo Lin
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350014, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rongbo Lin
Fujian Cancer Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2017
First Posted
December 18, 2017
Study Start
September 29, 2018
Primary Completion
December 10, 2019
Study Completion
January 10, 2020
Last Updated
March 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share