NCT03374995

Brief Summary

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies how well topical keratin works in treating radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer. Radiation dermatitis is a skin condition that is a common side effect of radiation therapy. The affected skin becomes painful, red, itchy, and blistered. Topical keratin may help to improve skin appearance and hydration in patients with breast cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2017

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 15, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 26, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2018

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 12, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 29, 2017

Results QC Date

November 26, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Incidence of Early Adverse Skin Reactions (EASRs)

    The Modified ONS Criteria for Radiation-Induced Acute Skin Toxicity will be used for classification of EASRs related to the skin. Participants will report in a total of 7 visits any experience with Grade I (faint or dull erythema; dry desquamation or Grade II (tender or bright erythema, patchy, moist desquamation) acute radiation dermatitis using the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grading system with Grade II considered the worse outcome. Comparative effectiveness will include the number or study participants in each arm that experience RTOG Grade I or Grade II radiation dermatitis and moist desquamation.

    Up to 4 weeks post-RT

  • Change in Quality of Life

    A 10-item assessment completed at each visit (7 total) to measure participant's Dermatology Life Quality Index. Score range is 0-3 (very much = 3; a lot = 2; a little = 1; and not at all or not relevant = 0) Maximum score of 30. The higher the score the more qualify of life is impaired. The average DQLI score at each study visit will be compared between the KeraStat® Cream arm and the SOC arm as a study effectiveness measure.

    Baseline to up to 7 weeks

  • Physician Observed Improvement in Skin Appearance

    Skin appearance was assessed by the treating physician at each visit (total of 7) using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity scale Grade 1 and Grade 2 assessed only. Score = (Grade 1 (follicular, faint or dull erythema, dry desquamation and Grade 2 (tender or bright erythema, patchy, ,moist desquamation) with Grade 2 being the worst for this study. Scores range from 0 to 2, with higher values being the worst. The average RTOG score at each study visit will be compared between the KeraStat® Cream arm and the SOC arm as a study effectiveness measure.

    Baseline to up to 7 weeks

  • Number of Participants Reported Change in Skin Appearance Using the Dermatology Quality of Life Index Scale

    Change in skin appearance by the participants' self-report using the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) was used to assess skin after completion of radiation. Score range is 0-3 (very much = 3; a lot = 2; a little = 1; and not at all or not relevant = 0) Maximum score of 30. A higher score shows better performance/improvement in skin appearance. The average Dermatology Qualify of Life Index score each study visit will be compared between the two arms with the number of participants reporting a score.

    Baseline to up to 7 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Group I (topical keratin)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive topical keratin topically at least BID until the end of radiation therapy (approximately 3-6 weeks).

Other: Quality-of-Life AssessmentDevice: Topical Keratin

Group II (standard of care)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive standard of care as directed by radiation oncologist until the end of radiation therapy (approximately 3-6 weeks).

Other: Best PracticeOther: Quality-of-Life Assessment

Interventions

Receive standard of care

Also known as: standard of care, standard therapy
Group II (standard of care)

Ancillary studies

Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment
Group I (topical keratin)Group II (standard of care)

Given topically

Also known as: KeraStat
Group I (topical keratin)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of breast cancer, received chemotherapy, and scheduled to receive 4 to 6 weeks of radiation therapy (radiation protocol of 42 Gy+)
  • Area to be irradiated representing 1-10% of total body surface area (TBSA)
  • Able and willing to sign protocol consent form
  • Able and willing to document symptoms and treatment details as often as needed, not to exceed daily notes
  • Able and willing to have photographs of the affected area taken regularly

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who are pregnant, lactating/nursing or plan to become pregnant
  • Previous radiation therapy to the area to be treated with radiation therapy
  • Receiving palliative radiation therapy
  • Unhealed or infected surgical sites in the irradiation area
  • Patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy or concurrent Herceptin as part of overall treatment plan (tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor allowed)
  • Use of oral corticosteroids or topical corticosteroids in the irradiation area
  • Use of Erbitux
  • Autoimmune disease
  • Skin disease in target irradiation area
  • Smoker
  • Known allergy to the standard of care or ingredients in KeraStat Cream

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsRadiodermatitis

Interventions

Practice Guidelines as TopicStandard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDermatitisRadiation InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Guidelines as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationQuality Indicators, Health Care

Results Point of Contact

Title
Principal investigator
Organization
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study Officials

  • Karen Winkfield

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2017

First Posted

December 15, 2017

Study Start

March 26, 2018

Primary Completion

November 1, 2018

Study Completion

November 1, 2018

Last Updated

June 11, 2024

Results First Posted

February 12, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Locations