Topical Keratin in Treating Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer
Pilot Study: KeraStat Cream for Radiation Dermatitis
4 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized pilot clinical trial studies how well topical keratin works in treating radiation dermatitis in patients with breast cancer. Radiation dermatitis is a skin condition that is a common side effect of radiation therapy. The affected skin becomes painful, red, itchy, and blistered. Topical keratin may help to improve skin appearance and hydration in patients with breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 12, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2024
February 1, 2020
7 months
November 29, 2017
November 26, 2019
May 29, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Incidence of Early Adverse Skin Reactions (EASRs)
The Modified ONS Criteria for Radiation-Induced Acute Skin Toxicity will be used for classification of EASRs related to the skin. Participants will report in a total of 7 visits any experience with Grade I (faint or dull erythema; dry desquamation or Grade II (tender or bright erythema, patchy, moist desquamation) acute radiation dermatitis using the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grading system with Grade II considered the worse outcome. Comparative effectiveness will include the number or study participants in each arm that experience RTOG Grade I or Grade II radiation dermatitis and moist desquamation.
Up to 4 weeks post-RT
Change in Quality of Life
A 10-item assessment completed at each visit (7 total) to measure participant's Dermatology Life Quality Index. Score range is 0-3 (very much = 3; a lot = 2; a little = 1; and not at all or not relevant = 0) Maximum score of 30. The higher the score the more qualify of life is impaired. The average DQLI score at each study visit will be compared between the KeraStat® Cream arm and the SOC arm as a study effectiveness measure.
Baseline to up to 7 weeks
Physician Observed Improvement in Skin Appearance
Skin appearance was assessed by the treating physician at each visit (total of 7) using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Toxicity scale Grade 1 and Grade 2 assessed only. Score = (Grade 1 (follicular, faint or dull erythema, dry desquamation and Grade 2 (tender or bright erythema, patchy, ,moist desquamation) with Grade 2 being the worst for this study. Scores range from 0 to 2, with higher values being the worst. The average RTOG score at each study visit will be compared between the KeraStat® Cream arm and the SOC arm as a study effectiveness measure.
Baseline to up to 7 weeks
Number of Participants Reported Change in Skin Appearance Using the Dermatology Quality of Life Index Scale
Change in skin appearance by the participants' self-report using the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) was used to assess skin after completion of radiation. Score range is 0-3 (very much = 3; a lot = 2; a little = 1; and not at all or not relevant = 0) Maximum score of 30. A higher score shows better performance/improvement in skin appearance. The average Dermatology Qualify of Life Index score each study visit will be compared between the two arms with the number of participants reporting a score.
Baseline to up to 7 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group I (topical keratin)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive topical keratin topically at least BID until the end of radiation therapy (approximately 3-6 weeks).
Group II (standard of care)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive standard of care as directed by radiation oncologist until the end of radiation therapy (approximately 3-6 weeks).
Interventions
Receive standard of care
Ancillary studies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of breast cancer, received chemotherapy, and scheduled to receive 4 to 6 weeks of radiation therapy (radiation protocol of 42 Gy+)
- Area to be irradiated representing 1-10% of total body surface area (TBSA)
- Able and willing to sign protocol consent form
- Able and willing to document symptoms and treatment details as often as needed, not to exceed daily notes
- Able and willing to have photographs of the affected area taken regularly
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant, lactating/nursing or plan to become pregnant
- Previous radiation therapy to the area to be treated with radiation therapy
- Receiving palliative radiation therapy
- Unhealed or infected surgical sites in the irradiation area
- Patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy or concurrent Herceptin as part of overall treatment plan (tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor allowed)
- Use of oral corticosteroids or topical corticosteroids in the irradiation area
- Use of Erbitux
- Autoimmune disease
- Skin disease in target irradiation area
- Smoker
- Known allergy to the standard of care or ingredients in KeraStat Cream
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Principal investigator
- Organization
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen Winkfield
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2017
First Posted
December 15, 2017
Study Start
March 26, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2018
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 11, 2024
Results First Posted
February 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02