Efficacy of Amoxicillin-metronidazole Compared to Clindamycin in Patients With Periodontitis and Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
42
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Periodontitis is an inflammation of the supporting structures of the teeth, usually caused by specific or groups of microorganisms that results in the progressive destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. the objective of periodontitis treatment is to reduce the number of periodontal pathogens. However, there is not an agreement in the use of systemic antibiotics in patients with diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to determine the efficacy of amoxicillin/metronidazole compared to clindamycin during non-surgical treatment of periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients and methods In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, a total of 42 patients with chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes were included in a 24-months follow-up. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either amoxicillin/metronidazole or clindamycin every for 7 days. Clinical determinations (depth of probing, bleeding at the probe and plaque index) were performed to determine the extent and severity of periodontitis before and after the pharmacological treatment. The intra-group differences were calculated with Wilcoxon rank test. The inter-group differences were calculated with Mann-Whitney test. Sex, bacterial plaque, and bleed to the sounding were summarized using proportions and analyzed with the chi-square method. In all analyses, a P-value of \<0.05 (two tailed) was considered statistically significant
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 23, 2020
CompletedSeptember 16, 2020
September 1, 2020
2.3 years
December 12, 2017
January 29, 2020
September 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Probing Depth
The size of the periodontal pocket
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sites With Plaques
7 days
Sites With Bleeding on Probing
7 days
Total Count of All Teeth Lost Across All Participants
2 years
Study Arms (2)
AMX-MET
ACTIVE COMPARATORAMX-MET Amoxicillin 500 mg + Metronidazole 250 mg. Capsules. 1 capsule tid during 7 days.
Clindamycin
EXPERIMENTALClindamycin Clindamycin 300 mg + placebo. Capsules. 1 capsule tid during 7 days.
Interventions
Subjects were instructed to take a capsule three times a day for 7 days
Subjects were instructed to take a capsule three times a day for 7 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of both sexes
- Age \>18 to 70 years
- Diagnosis of chronic periodontitis according to the 1999 International World Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions
- History of type 2 diabetes
- HbA1C \< 8 %
- Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \< 180 mg/dL.
You may not qualify if:
- Aggressive periodontitis
- Pregnant or lactating females,
- Required antibiotic pre-medication for the performance of periodontal examination and treatment or received antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months were excluded.
- A history of anti-inflammatory therapy within preceding six months
- Had received a course of periodontal treatment within the last 6 months,
- Allergies to penicillin, metronidazole or clindamycin,
- Not able to provide consent to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The prin- cipal limitation of the present study was the absence of a group with SRP plus placebo. This study design, using a placebo group, could help us to evaluate the efficacy of clindamycin versus SRP alone.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Arieh Roldán Mercado Sesma
- Organization
- Centro Universitario de Tonalá, Universidad de Guadalajara
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research professor associate B
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2017
First Posted
December 15, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 16, 2020
Results First Posted
June 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share