NCT03369873

Brief Summary

This study´s objective was to identify the effectiveness of nursing orientation for the reduction of anxiety and stress of patients that was waiting cardiac catheterization. Method. This is a randomized clinical trial. The sample consisted of patients that was waiting cardiac catheterization who were divided into two groups: intervention group (patients who received nursing orientation with a validated guidance manual about this procedure) and control group (patients who received the routine nursing orientation). The primary end points were the anxiety and stress, which was evaluated in two moments (before and after the nursing orientation). The State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-state) was used to assess anxiety and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was used to assess stress. Prior to the collection, the research project was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee and the data was collected after its approval.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
122

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

December 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

cardiac catheterizationanxietystressnursing orientation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from score of anxiety and stress

    The anxiety and stress were evaluated using the State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-state) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), immediately before and after interventions. The STAI -state consists of 20 items, with Likert responses ranging from 1 (Absolutely not) to 4 (Very High), obtaining values from 20 to 80 points, that the higher the score, the greater the patient's anxiety. Anxiety was categorized as follows: low anxiety (20-34 points), moderate anxiety (35-49 points), high anxiety (50-64 points) and very high anxiety (65-80 points). The PSS-10 has 10 items, whose score varies from 0 to 40 points, and the higher the scores, the greater the perceived stress of the patient.

    The patients were followed for one day

Study Arms (2)

Nursing Orientation with guidance manual

EXPERIMENTAL

The patients received the nursing orientation with validated guidance manual of cardiac catheterization.

Other: Guidance Manual

Routine Nursing Orientation

NO INTERVENTION

The patients received the routine nursing orientation about cardiac catheterization.

Interventions

The intervention group received of nursing orientation using a validated guidance manual about cardiac catheterization.

Also known as: Routine Orientation
Nursing Orientation with guidance manual

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 79 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Minimum 18 years
  • Literate
  • Stable patients in Killip I and II
  • Maximum 79 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Precordial pain
  • Patients who undergo emergency cardiac catheterization
  • Patients with visual deficit and / or with some alteration of the level of consciousness
  • Patients using benzodiazepine, anxiolytic and / or herbal medicines
  • Situations that patient received orientation about the procedure prior to initiation of the current hospitalization survey and / or when reporting that they do not wish to receive information.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Peterson JC, Link AR, Jobe JB, Winston GJ, Marina Klimasiewfski E, Allegrante JP. Developing self-management education in coronary artery disease. Heart Lung. 2014 Mar-Apr;43(2):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

    PMID: 24373484BACKGROUND
  • Reis RS, Hino AA, Anez CR. Perceived stress scale: reliability and validity study in Brazil. J Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):107-14. doi: 10.1177/1359105309346343.

    PMID: 20064889BACKGROUND
  • Wu KL, Chen SR, Ko WC, Kuo SY, Chen PL, Su HF, Chang WY. The effectiveness of an accessibility-enhanced multimedia informational educational programme in reducing anxiety and increasing satisfaction of patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):2063-73. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12469. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

    PMID: 24372795BACKGROUND
  • Murakami L, Rua ES, Santos VB, Lopes JL. Effectiveness of educational intervention with manual for anxiety and stress reduction: controlled clinical trial. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Sep 5;75Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e20210757. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0757. eCollection 2022. English, Portuguese.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Angina, UnstableAnxiety Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Angina PectorisMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesChest PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Juliana de L Lopes, PhD

    Federal University of São Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The profissional that evaluated the patients, was not informed if the patients were of the control or intervention group. The outcomes assessor was not informed if the group 1 and 2 was control or intervention group.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The patients were randomized to one of two groups (control or intervention), according to the sequence determined by the Random System
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2017

First Posted

December 12, 2017

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We not plan to make individual participant data avaiable to other researchers.