Study Stopped
recrutment problems
Surgery of the Pilon Fractures
MICOPIL
Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Reduction in the Surgery of the Pilon Fractures
2 other identifiers
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The assessment consists in comparing the osteosynthesis plate with minimally invasive technique versus open reduction and internal fixation. The aim of study is to compare (period of bandage, efficacy, safety), these two types of surgical technique by using a prospective, randomized analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 26, 2024
CompletedMay 3, 2024
April 1, 2024
6.4 years
November 23, 2017
May 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Healing
Measure of the duration of the bandage with index form of follow-up the state cutaneous of the wound. This measure was a number.
at 45 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
AOFAS clinical score
pre op, 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months
Nach mazur and al score
pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months
The Foot & Ankle Disability Index
pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months
Pain
pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months
Complications
pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
minimally invasive method
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients are treated with minimally invasive method
open reduction method
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients are treated with open reduction method
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- More than 18-year-old with opened or closed pilon fracture Cauchoix type 1,
- signed patient consent
You may not qualify if:
- Open pilon fracture cauchoix type 2 or 3,
- infection of the operating site,
- previous osseous disease
- patient who are unwilling or unable to give consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roger ERIVAN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2017
First Posted
December 8, 2017
Study Start
November 23, 2017
Primary Completion
April 26, 2024
Study Completion
April 26, 2024
Last Updated
May 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04