Recurrence Rate of Mini-SLET vs. Limbal-Conjunctival Autograft in Primary Pterygium Excision
Recurrence Rate of Mini-SLET (Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation) vs. Limbal-Conjunctival Autograft in Primary Pterygium Excision
1 other identifier
interventional
57
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To study the efficacy and safety of amniotic membrane transplantation as an adjunctive therapy after surgical excision of primary pterygium and compare the clinical outcomes with conjunctival autograft
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 17, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 9, 2018
March 1, 2018
1.2 years
November 30, 2017
March 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence rate
Regrowth of pterygium
one day
Study Arms (2)
Mini-SLET
EXPERIMENTALSimple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation
Limbal-Conjunctival Autograft
EXPERIMENTALPatients treated with limbal-conjunctival autograft
Interventions
Pterygium excision is the first step for repair
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with primary nasal pterygium \> 2mm
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant
- Previous ocular surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Tseng SC. Concept and application of limbal stem cells. Eye (Lond). 1989;3 ( Pt 2):141-57. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.22.
PMID: 2695347RESULTTananuvat N, Martin T. The results of amniotic membrane transplantation for primary pterygium compared with conjunctival autograft. Cornea. 2004 Jul;23(5):458-63. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000116522.57227.97.
PMID: 15220729RESULTKucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: surgical and cosmetic outcome. Cornea. 2007 May;26(4):407-13. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318033b3d4.
PMID: 17457187RESULTOliva-Bienzobas V, Nava-Castaneda A, Jimenez-Corona A, Kahuam-Lopez N, Ramirez-Miranda A, Navas A, Graue-Hernandez EO. Comparison of mini-simple limbal epithelial transplantation and conjunctival-limbal autograft for the treatment of primary pterygium: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 22;107(12):1776-1781. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2021-320707.
PMID: 37739769DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2017
First Posted
December 6, 2017
Study Start
September 17, 2015
Primary Completion
November 17, 2016
Study Completion
November 28, 2017
Last Updated
March 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Patient data will be analyzed by a single researcher