NCT03362775

Brief Summary

The hypothesis of this study is that propofol sedation does not affect the detectability of a movement intention in the EEG motor cortex signal. EEG signals will be recorded during the realization of intentional movements and movement intentions by the healthy volunteers, as well as during median nerve stimulation before and during propofol perfusion according to a target control infusion. (0 µg/mL; 0.5 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2017

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2018

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 16, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

November 27, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • ERD/ERS amplitude

    Amplitude of event-related synchronization (ERS) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) will be recorded within 2 seconds of each motor task (real movement, imaginary movement) as well as median nerve stimulation. This amplitude will be compared tio the value recorded in the absence of propofol.

    2 hours, during the experimentation

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Dose relationship between ERD/ERS and propofol concentration

    2 hours, during the experimentation

  • Detection ERS after median nerve stimulation

    2 hours, during the experimentation

Study Arms (1)

All subjects

OTHER

EEG will be recorded in all subjects before (0.0 µL/mL) and during a target controlled infusion of propofol (0.5 µL/mL and 1.0 µL/mL).

Drug: Propofol

Interventions

Target-controlled infusion of propofol with an effect-site concentration of 0.0 µL/mL; 0.5 µL/mL and 1.0 µL/mL.

All subjects

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 28 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy volunteers
  • Male
  • affiliated to French social security
  • normal physical examination
  • \< body mass index \< 28

You may not qualify if:

  • Female
  • allergy to propofol or one of the emulsion compounds (soja, egg)
  • any pathology which may influence EEG recording or nerve conduction, such as diabetes, neuropathy, epilepsy, depression, psychotropic drug usage, drug usage)
  • any allergic reaction associated with anesthesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine - University Hospital of Nancy

Nancy, 54500, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Blokland YM, Farquhar JD, Mourisse J, Scheffer GJ, Lerou JG, Bruhn J. Towards a novel monitor of intraoperative awareness: selecting paradigm settings for a movement-based brain-computer interface. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044336. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

    PMID: 22970202BACKGROUND
  • Blokland Y, Farquhar J, Lerou J, Mourisse J, Scheffer GJ, Geffen GJ, Spyrou L, Bruhn J. Decoding motor responses from the EEG during altered states of consciousness induced by propofol. J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026014. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

    PMID: 26859192BACKGROUND
  • Lindig-Leon C, Bougrain L. Comparison of sensorimotor rhythms in EEG signals during simple and combined motor imageries over the contra and ipsilateral hemispheres. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:3953-6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319259.

    PMID: 26737159BACKGROUND
  • Rimbert S, Schmartz D, Bougrain L, Meistelman C, Baumann C, Guerci P. MOTANA: study protocol to investigate motor cerebral activity during a propofol sedation. Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3596-9.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Propofol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Sébastien Rimbert

    Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Philippe GUERCI, MD

    CHRU de NANCY

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Claude Meistelman, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
EEG will be electronically recorded and anonymised. The outcome assessor will analyse the EEG without knowledge of the propofol concentration.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Every subject will have an EEG recording in the absence of propofol, or during light sedation with propofol at an effect-site target concentration of 0.5 µg/mL and 1.0 µg/mL. Each subject will be his own control.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
ph

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2017

First Posted

December 5, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion

October 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

February 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations