NCT03359148

Brief Summary

Background: Few studies have investigated the difference of bacterial contamination between conventional reused ventilator systems and disposable closed ventilator-suction systems. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial contamination rates of the reused and disposable ventilation systems, and the association between system disconnection and bacterial contamination of ventilator systems. Methods: The enrolled patients used a conventional reused ventilator system and a disposable closed ventilator-suction system, respectively, for a week; specimens were then collected from the ventilators' internal system to evaluate human and environmental bacterial contamination. The sputum specimens from patients were also analyzed in this study. Results: The detection rate of bacteria in the conventional reused ventilator system was substantially higher than that in the disposable system. The inspiratory and expiratory limbs of disposable closed ventilator-suction system had higher bacterial concentrations than the conventional reused ventilator system. The bacterial concentration in the heated humidifier (HH) of the reused system was significantly higher than that in the disposable system. Positive associations existed among the bacterial concentrations at different locations in the reused and disposable ventilator systems, respectively. The predominant bacteria identified in the reused and disposable ventilator systems included Acinetobacter spp., Bacillus cereus, Elizabethkingia spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Stenotrophomonas (Xan) maltophilia. Conclusion: Both the reused and disposable ventilation systems had high bacterial contamination rates after one week of use. Disconnection of the ventilator systems should be avoided during system operation for decreasing the risks of environmental pollution and human exposure, especially for the disposable system.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 2, 2015

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2017

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 2, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 2, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 21, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Nosocomial infectionVentilator systemClosed suction systemOpen suction systemBacterial contamination

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • bacterial concentration

    comparison of the two ventilator systems

    7 days later

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • bacterial detection rate

    7 days later

Study Arms (2)

Disposable ventilator system

The experimental study group will be assigned to a disposable ventilator system combined with an auto-filled heated humidifier (HH), a closed suction catheter, and a closed aerosol therapy procedure with a valved T-adaptor.

Device: Disposable ventilator system

Conventional reused ventilator system

According to clinical commonly used system, the control study group will be assigned to use with conventional reused ventilator system, combined with a manually filled HH, an open suction catheter, and a conventional aerosol therapy procedure.

Device: Conventional reused ventilator system

Interventions

Disposable ventilator system
Conventional reused ventilator system

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 91 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

A total of 16 patients (10 men and 6 women, aged between 20 and 91 years) were included for the final analysis. Patients had been on a mechanical ventilator for 17-46 days, and had a primary diagnosis of sepsis, septic shock, cardiac arrest, pneumonia (CAP or HAP), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or lung contusion.

You may qualify if:

  • the mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU

You may not qualify if:

  • the sputum culture results of the patients indicated the presence of drug-resistant bacteria, influenza virus, and early extubation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Li YC, Lin HL, Liao FC, Wang SS, Chang HC, Hsu HF, Chen SH, Wan GH. Potential risk for bacterial contamination in conventional reused ventilator systems and disposable closed ventilator-suction systems. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194246. eCollection 2018.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cross Infection

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsIatrogenic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • GWO-HWA WAN, Ph.D.

    Chang Gung University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
15 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2017

First Posted

December 2, 2017

Study Start

April 2, 2015

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

July 31, 2016

Last Updated

December 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share