Potential Risk for Bacterial Contamination in Ventilator Systems
1 other identifier
observational
27
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Few studies have investigated the difference of bacterial contamination between conventional reused ventilator systems and disposable closed ventilator-suction systems. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial contamination rates of the reused and disposable ventilation systems, and the association between system disconnection and bacterial contamination of ventilator systems. Methods: The enrolled patients used a conventional reused ventilator system and a disposable closed ventilator-suction system, respectively, for a week; specimens were then collected from the ventilators' internal system to evaluate human and environmental bacterial contamination. The sputum specimens from patients were also analyzed in this study. Results: The detection rate of bacteria in the conventional reused ventilator system was substantially higher than that in the disposable system. The inspiratory and expiratory limbs of disposable closed ventilator-suction system had higher bacterial concentrations than the conventional reused ventilator system. The bacterial concentration in the heated humidifier (HH) of the reused system was significantly higher than that in the disposable system. Positive associations existed among the bacterial concentrations at different locations in the reused and disposable ventilator systems, respectively. The predominant bacteria identified in the reused and disposable ventilator systems included Acinetobacter spp., Bacillus cereus, Elizabethkingia spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Stenotrophomonas (Xan) maltophilia. Conclusion: Both the reused and disposable ventilation systems had high bacterial contamination rates after one week of use. Disconnection of the ventilator systems should be avoided during system operation for decreasing the risks of environmental pollution and human exposure, especially for the disposable system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2017
CompletedDecember 2, 2017
November 1, 2017
1.2 years
November 21, 2017
November 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bacterial concentration
comparison of the two ventilator systems
7 days later
Secondary Outcomes (1)
bacterial detection rate
7 days later
Study Arms (2)
Disposable ventilator system
The experimental study group will be assigned to a disposable ventilator system combined with an auto-filled heated humidifier (HH), a closed suction catheter, and a closed aerosol therapy procedure with a valved T-adaptor.
Conventional reused ventilator system
According to clinical commonly used system, the control study group will be assigned to use with conventional reused ventilator system, combined with a manually filled HH, an open suction catheter, and a conventional aerosol therapy procedure.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
A total of 16 patients (10 men and 6 women, aged between 20 and 91 years) were included for the final analysis. Patients had been on a mechanical ventilator for 17-46 days, and had a primary diagnosis of sepsis, septic shock, cardiac arrest, pneumonia (CAP or HAP), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or lung contusion.
You may qualify if:
- the mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU
You may not qualify if:
- the sputum culture results of the patients indicated the presence of drug-resistant bacteria, influenza virus, and early extubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chang Gung Universitylead
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospitalcollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Li YC, Lin HL, Liao FC, Wang SS, Chang HC, Hsu HF, Chen SH, Wan GH. Potential risk for bacterial contamination in conventional reused ventilator systems and disposable closed ventilator-suction systems. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194246. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29547638DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
GWO-HWA WAN, Ph.D.
Chang Gung University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 15 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2017
First Posted
December 2, 2017
Study Start
April 2, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 31, 2016
Last Updated
December 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share