NCT03357484

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) extraction wound healing, patient postoperative discomfort, and incidence of alveolar osteitis (AO). Thirty patients (18 female, 12 male) who met the inclusion criteria for this split-mouth study underwent bilateral IMTM surgical extractions. Following extraction, randomization was done. One socket received L-PRF, and the other socket served as a regular blood clot control. Postoperatively, the soft tissue healing index (HI), pain according to visual analog scale (VAS), facial swelling using a horizontal and vertical guide, and incidence of AO were evaluated 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2017

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 30, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 18, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

impacted toothpainplatelet-rich fibrinthird molartooth extractionwound healing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score change evaluation

    Pain VAS scale consisted of 10 units in combination with a graphic rating scale, where the leftmost score 0 represented absence of pain and the rightmost score 10 indicated the worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain.

    1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-, 5th-, 6th-, and 7th- postoperative day

  • Swelling change evaluation

    Facial swelling clinical assessments were performed by a single blinded examiner at baseline (before surgery) and at the 1st-, 3rd-, and 7th-day visits postoperatively at approximately the same time of day. Patients were seated in a relaxed position with the inferior border of the mandible parallel to the floor. Facial swelling in the operation side was evaluated using two facial measurements with nonexpandable tape: * In the vertical dimension, measurement from the lateral canthus of the eye to the pogonion of the mandible was taken; * In the horizontal dimension, the distance from the lower border of the tragus to the mouth commissure on both operated sides was measured. Facial swelling value was taken as the average value of these two measurements. The preoperative measurement was considered as the baseline value.

    1st-, 3rd-, and 7th- postoperative day

  • Healing index change evaluation

    Postextractional wound soft tissue healing was evaluated using a modified postextraction wound healing index (HI) \[24\], which considered four parameters: bleeding, suppuration, tissue color, and consistency of the healing tissue. Each parameter involved 3 scoring levels; consequently, the cumulative scoring scale ranged from 4, corresponding to excellent healing, to 12, indicating severely impaired healing. HI was evaluated clinically by the same blinded examiner at the 1st-, 3rd-, 7th-, and 14th- after surgery.

    1st-, 3rd-, 7th-, and 14th- postoperative day

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Alveolar osteitis

    2 postoperative weeks

Study Arms (2)

L-PRF

EXPERIMENTAL

Third molar extraction sockets were filled with two leukocyte- and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) clots

Procedure: Leukocyte- and platelet rich fibrin

Blood clot

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Third molar extraction sockets allowed to form a natural blood clot and undergo natural healing

Procedure: Blood clot

Interventions

Prior to surgery, two 9 ml glass-coated tubes (Intra-Spin, Intra-Lock International, Boca Raton, USA) of patient venous blood were collected. Tubes were transferred to a centrifuge (Andreas Hettich GmbH \& Co.KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) and processed for 12 minutes at 2800 rpm to prepare L-PRF.

L-PRF
Blood clotPROCEDURE

Natural blood clot formed within extraction socket

Blood clot

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients with an age of 18 to 60 years;
  • Healthy patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) index ≤ 2);
  • Sole bilateral extractions of IMTMs during the same surgery;
  • Complete root formation of tooth No. 38 and 48 at radiological examination;
  • Absence of acute inflammation and/or infection in the IMTMs area;
  • No history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in the past 4 weeks prior to surgery;
  • Same-difficulty bilateral IMTM extractions, according to both Pederson and Juodzbalys \& Daugela classifications;
  • Signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoking patients;
  • IMTM surgery duration difference greater than 10 minutes for each side, seeking to avoid bias;
  • Different surgical manipulations taken at each IMTM surgery site;
  • Presence of any neoplastic lesion (benign or malignant), clinically or radiologically evaluable, at the site or close to the impacted tooth;
  • Presence of any radiolucent lesion \>1 cm at impacted tooth level;
  • Absence of the adjacent tooth;
  • Systemic conditions or pharmacological treatments altering oral microbiota or immunologic response;
  • Alcohol or drug abuse;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Lack of compliance by the patient or any other evidence suggesting that the patient was not likely to follow the study protocol.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Kaunas, 50009, Lithuania

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainEdemaTooth, Impacted

Interventions

Leukocyte CountBlood Coagulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Cell CountCell CountCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHematologic TestsInvestigative TechniquesCell Physiological PhenomenaBlood Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological PhenomenaHemostasis

Study Officials

  • Povilas Daugela, DDS

    Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Vaidas Grimuta, DDS

    Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dalius Sakavicius, DDS, PhD

    Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Juozas Jonaitis, DDS, PhD

    Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gintaras Juodzbalys, DDS, PhD

    Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants and Independent Outcomes Assessor were blinded to study groups. Names of participants were coded and known to Principal investigator only.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients who met the inclusion criteria for this split-mouth study underwent bilateral IMTM surgical extractions. Following extraction, randomization was done. One socket received L-PRF, and the other socket served as a regular blood clot control.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
DDS

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2017

First Posted

November 30, 2017

Study Start

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

May 1, 2018

Last Updated

November 30, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There are no Plan to Share IPD

Locations