2%-Mepivacaine With Two Different Vasoconstrictors Solutions in Third Molar Surgery a Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dental treatments, particularly third molars extraction, can become extremely uncomfortable and painful. They are associated to anxiety, fear and many other unpleasant sensations. During surgery, patients can present cardiorespiratory repercussions of these sensations. This fact generally justifies the employment of methods of monitoring and appliance of safer therapeutic alternatives. Local anesthetics are the most frequently drugs used in dentistry. Vasoconstrictors, particularly epinephrine, are important components of anesthetic solutions to increased time for anesthetic absorption and consequently increasing the duration of anesthesia. The use of smaller amounts of anesthetic solution can reduce the risk of systemic toxicity, however decrease the total surgical time. It is well known that the amount of epinephrine injected into patients during anesthetic procedures can produce adverse hemodynamic effects. Levonordefrin was adding to dental cartridges promising to reduce cardiac stimulation due it less β activity, and maintain the same clinical and systemic effects. But some studies for maxillary or intraosseous infiltrations showed no difference in heart rate and any anesthetic success over epinephrine. Thus, this study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anesthetic mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 or 1:20,000 levonordefrin employing a clinical trial model of third molars extractions in healthy adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedMay 11, 2016
May 1, 2016
10 months
November 8, 2015
May 10, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Blood pressure values
assessment of blood pressure values (systolic and diastolic)) in mmHg by a pulse electronic device
20 minutes pre-operatory, 5 minutes before surgery, 5 minutes after anesthesia, 10 minutes after suture
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Heart Rate values
20 minutes pre-operatory, 5 minutes before surgery, 5 minutes after anesthesia, 10 minutes after suture
Bleeding
after 1 hour postoperatively
Pain
6, 8,24 and 48 hours after suture
Study Arms (2)
mepivacaine chloridrato epinephrine
ACTIVE COMPARATORSide of operation that is going to receive anesthesia with 2% mepivacaine chloridrato with 1:100.000 epinephrine, maximum of 4 cartridges
mepivacaine chloridrato levonordefrin
ACTIVE COMPARATORSide of operation that is going to receive anesthesia with 2% mepivacaine chloridrato with 1:20.000 levonordefrin, maximum of 4 cartridges
Interventions
local anesthesia for tooth removal
local anesthesia for tooth removal
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- minimum body weight of 50Kg, necessity of bilateral impacted third molar removal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maria Cristina Zindel Deboni
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil
Related Publications (6)
Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400006.
PMID: 20835569BACKGROUNDHersh EV, Giannakopoulos H. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents and dental vasoconstrictors. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;54(4):687-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.009.
PMID: 20831932BACKGROUNDSerrera Figallo MA, Velazquez Cayon RT, Torres Lagares D, Corcuera Flores JR, Machuca Portillo G. Use of anesthetics associated to vasoconstrictors for dentistry in patients with cardiopathies. Review of the literature published in the last decade. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012 Apr 1;4(2):e107-11. doi: 10.4317/jced.50590. eCollection 2012 Apr.
PMID: 24558534BACKGROUNDPellicer-Chover H, Cervera-Ballester J, Sanchis-Bielsa JM, Penarrocha-Diago MA, Penarrocha-Diago M, Garcia-Mira B. Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):e66-71. doi: 10.4317/jced.50869. eCollection 2013 Apr 1.
PMID: 24455059BACKGROUNDTorres-Lagares D, Serrera-Figallo MA, Machuca-Portillo G, Corcuera-Flores JR, Machuca-Portillo C, Castillo-Oyague R, Gutierrez-Perez JL. Cardiovascular effect of dental anesthesia with articaine (40 mg with epinefrine 0,5 mg % and 40 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) versus mepivacaine (30 mg and 20 mg with epinefrine 1 mg%) in medically compromised cardiac patients: a cross-over, randomized, single blinded study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e655-60. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17892.
PMID: 22322521BACKGROUNDLawaty I, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations. Anesth Prog. 2010 Winter;57(4):139-44. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.4.139.
PMID: 21174567BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcelo Minharro Cechetti, PhD
Post - Doctorate
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2015
First Posted
November 11, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share