Patient Satisfaction and Retention of Upper Complete Denture Base Using Rapid Prototyping Versus a Conventional One
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparing patient satisfaction and retention of upper complete denture fabricated using two different denture base materials, the first fabricated using rapid prototyping method while the second is following conventional methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedJune 12, 2018
June 1, 2018
1.2 years
July 30, 2017
June 11, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire using likert scale five points represent degree of satisfaction and compare the result to each other
3 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Retention
3 month
Study Arms (2)
Rapid prototyping Denture base
SHAM COMPARATORComplete Denture Using Rapid Prototyping method for fabrication of the complete denture depending on
Heat Cured Conventional Complete Denture
SHAM COMPARATORComplete Denture using heat cured Denture base using flasking and deflasking method
Interventions
The introduction of rapid prototyping (RP)Stereo lithography (SLA) technology, which mainly depends on addition of layers of materials which would be polymerized using a light curing unit. It consists of a bath of photo polymerized liquid and ultraviolet unit for curing these layers, that would bond to each other till forming the full object. SLA has many advantage as high accuracy, high mechanical strength, smooth surface finish with close tolerance and fine details printing, but it has some limitation as it is only limited Material, in addition to the high material and equipment cost.
it is the main treatment for most of completely edentoulous Cases
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ranging from 40-70 years.
- Patients who can understand and respond to a written questionnaire in Arabic.
- Cooperative patients
You may not qualify if:
- Pathological changes of residual ridges.
- Patients with debilitating systemic diseases.
- Patients with xerostomia.
- Patients with flabby and flat ridges.
- Patients with allergy to acrylic resin
- Patient with sever undercuts, or irregular bony exostosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry
Cairo, 111789, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Master Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2017
First Posted
November 28, 2017
Study Start
April 20, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06