NCT03281603

Brief Summary

The objective of this trial is to compare patient satisfaction and retention of complete denture manufactured by three different techniques: CAD/CAM milling, CAD/CAM 3D printing and conventional technique.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2017

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2017

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Patient satisfactionRetention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • patient satisfaction

    The questionnaire will include 5 main categories; each category having questions about Functional complaint about the denture, Overall mastication ability, Masticating ability for different types of food, Effect of mental and daily life and Overall denture satisfaction.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Retention

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

CAD/CAM complete denture

EXPERIMENTAL

First intervention: Constructing complete denture by CAD/CAM technology utilizing milling technique. Second intervention:Constructing complete denture CAD/CAM technology utilizing 3D printing technique

Device: CAD/CAM complete denture

Conventional complete denture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Constructing complete denture by conventional technique of denture processing

Device: CAD/CAM complete denture

Interventions

complete denture will be designed by computer aided designing (CAD) and manufactured by computer aided manufacturing(CAM) utilizing Milling and 3D printing techniques

CAD/CAM complete dentureConventional complete denture

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Completely edentulous patients ranging from age 55 to 75 years.
  • Angle's Class I skeletal relationship.
  • Well-developed ridge with U-shaped palatal vault and adequate firm mucosa.
  • Last extraction took place six months ago.
  • Normal facial symmetry.
  • Cooperative patients.

You may not qualify if:

  • Temporomandibular disorders
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy
  • Flabby tissues or sharp mandibular residual ridge.
  • Heavy smokers.
  • Patient's with neuromuscular disorders
  • Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Angle's class II and III skeletal relationship

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Faculty of Dentistry,Cairo university

Giza, 002, Egypt

Location

Cairo university

Giza, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jun;109(6):361-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2.

    PMID: 23763779BACKGROUND
  • Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, Minakuchi S, Ohbayashi N. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(1):93-6. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2010-112. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

    PMID: 21282882BACKGROUND
  • Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S, Okada M, Nokubi T. A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 1994 Jan-Feb;7(1):17-21.

    PMID: 8179777BACKGROUND
  • Han W, Li Y, Zhang Y, Lv Y, Zhang Y, Hu P, Liu H, Ma Z, Shen Y. Design and fabrication of complete dentures using CAD/CAM technology. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(1):e5435. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005435.

    PMID: 28072686BACKGROUND
  • Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Finger I. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 May;111(5):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.014. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

    PMID: 24461946BACKGROUND
  • Chen H, Wang H, Lv P, Wang Y, Sun Y. Quantitative Evaluation of Tissue Surface Adaption of CAD-Designed and 3D Printed Wax Pattern of Maxillary Complete Denture. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:453968. doi: 10.1155/2015/453968. Epub 2015 Oct 25.

    PMID: 26583108BACKGROUND
  • Inokoshi M, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping. Dent Mater J. 2012 Feb 3;31(1):40-6. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-113. Epub 2012 Jan 21.

    PMID: 22277604BACKGROUND
  • Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid Prototyping Technologies and their Applications in Prosthodontics, a Review of Literature. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1):1-9.

    PMID: 25759851BACKGROUND
  • AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

    PMID: 27765399BACKGROUND
  • Bilhan H, Erdogan O, Ergin S, Celik M, Ates G, Geckili O. Complication rates and patient satisfaction with removable dentures. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 May;4(2):109-15. doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.109. Epub 2012 May 30.

    PMID: 22737317BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Mohamed M. Abo Heikal, PHD

    Assistant lecturer, faculty of Dentistry, MSA University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The Principal investigator, main supervisors and co-supervisor cannot be blinded as the trial will include digital designing of complete dentures on the CAD software and in the steps of the manufacturing techniques.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, MSA University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2017

First Posted

September 13, 2017

Study Start

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

January 1, 2020

Last Updated

February 3, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations