NCT03351075

Brief Summary

In addition to fatigue, pain is the most frequent and persistent symptom following breast cancer and breast cancer treatment. Despite the effectiveness of different physical therapy modalities, such as manual techniques, passive mobilizations and exercises, many patients still experience pain and subsequent difficulties in daily functioning at short and long term. Past decades, the awareness on the important role of educational interventions in the management of pain in general has increased. Educational interventions aim at explaining and improving the knowledge, control and attitude of the patient regarding his/her pain complaint. However, these educational interventions are often restricted to more biomedical pain management instructions and general advice on physical activity and analgesics (= traditional biomedical education). Only recently, increased knowledge on pain mechanisms led to a more modern educational approach. This modern approach is suited to explain more complex issues associated with pain and takes into account many more factors related to pain. To our knowledge, only one controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of a modern educational intervention in the early stage of breast cancer treatment. The results were very promising for shoulder function. However, only short-term effects were examined, no randomization was performed and no pain-related and socio-economic outcomes were evaluated. Therefore, the aim of the proposed project is to investigate the effectiveness of a similar modern educational program, in addition to standard physical therapy care, in the early treatment phase of breast cancer in comparison with traditional biomedical education. A randomized controlled trial will be performed with a long-term follow up period. The primary outcome parameter is pain-related disability. Secondary outcomes are different dimensions of pain, physical and mental functioning, return to work and health-care related costs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
184

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 27, 2017

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 5, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 5, 2021

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 21, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

October 4, 2017

Results QC Date

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Self-reported Change in Pain-related Disability

    Measured with Pain Disability Index, an instrument for measuring the impact that pain has on the ability of a person to participate in essential life activities. Scores between 0 and 70. The higher the score the greater the person's disability due to pain.

    Change between baseline and one year follow-up assessment

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Self-reported Pain-related Disability

    Postoperatively after 4 months of intensive treatment and at 1,5 years (after follow-up)

  • Self-reported Pain-intensity

    Postoperatively after 4 months of intensive treatment, at 1 year (after maintenance treatment) and at 1,5 years (after follow-up)

  • Self-reported Central Sensitization Symptoms

    Postoperatively after 4 months of intensive treatment, at 1 year (after maintenance treatment) and at 1,5 years (after follow-up)

  • Altered Somatosensory Functions (Touch)

    Postoperatively after 4 months of intensive treatment, at 1 year (after maintenance treatment) and at 1,5 years (after follow-up)

  • Altered Somatosensory Functions (Temperature-warmth)

    Postoperatively after 4 months of intensive treatment, at 1 year (after maintenance treatment) and at 1,5 years (after follow-up)

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard physical therapy program + Modern educational program

Other: Standard physical therapy programOther: Modern educational program

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard physical therapy program + Traditional biomedical educational program

Other: Standard physical therapy programOther: Traditional biomedical educational program

Interventions

Mobilisations, stretching, scar tissue treatment and exercises * Start immediately after surgery, sessions are individual and take 30 minutes * Intensive phase (4 months): 1-2x/week * Maintenance phase (8 months, 3 sessions): 6, 8 and 12 months post-surgery

Control groupIntervention group

This modern neuroscience educational approach is suited to explain more complex issues associated with pain such as the involvement of peripheral and central mechanisms, neuroplasticity and pain behaviour. * Sessions are individual and take 30 minutes, in addition to the standard physical therapy sessions * 3 sessions during week 1-2, 3 booster sessions at 6, 8 and 12 months post-surgery

Intervention group

Traditional educational interventions are applied according to the biomedical model. This means that the patient's pain experience is explained from a tissue (injured versus healthy tissue) and biomechanics perspective * Sessions are individual and take 30 minutes, in addition to the standard physical therapy sessions * 3 sessions during week 1-2, 3 booster sessions at 6, 8 and 12 months post-surgery

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with primary breast cancer
  • Unilateral surgery including, either:
  • Axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy/breast -conserving/reconstructive surgery OR Sentinel Node Biopsy and mastectomy/reconstructive surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Active metastasis
  • Cannot participate during the entire study period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Leuven

Leuven, 3000, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • De Groef A, Devoogdt N, Van der Gucht E, Dams L, Bernar K, Godderis L, Morlion B, Moloney N, Smeets A, Van Wilgen P, Meeus M. EduCan trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, emotional and work-related functioning. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):e025742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025742.

    PMID: 30612114BACKGROUND
  • Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, Morlion B, Godderis L, Haenen V, De Vrieze T, Fieuws S, Moloney N, Van Wilgen P, Meeus M, De Groef A. Effect of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, and emotional functioning: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (EduCan trial). Pain. 2023 Jul 1;164(7):1489-1501. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002838. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

  • Dams L, Van der Gucht E, Haenen V, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, Morlion B, Moloney N, Fieuws S, De Groef A, Meeus M. Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education on somatosensory functioning after surgery for breast cancer: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;307(2):248-272. doi: 10.1002/ar.25127. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

  • De Groef A, Van der Gucht E, Devoogdt N, Smeets A, Bernar K, Morlion B, Godderis L, De Vrieze T, Fieuws S, Meeus M, Dams L. Returning to Work After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education. J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Dec;33(4):757-765. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10103-9. Epub 2023 May 12.

  • Amber G, Lore D, Elien VG, Jan S, Michel M, An G, Mira M. From breast cancer diagnosis to survivorship: Analyzing perioperative biopsychosocial phenotypes and their relationship to pain on long term. J Pain. 2025 Jan;26:104709. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104709. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Prof. An De Groef
Organization
KU Leuven

Study Officials

  • Lore Dams, Dra

    University of Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Elien Van der Gucht, Dra

    University of Leuven

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2017

First Posted

November 22, 2017

Study Start

November 27, 2017

Primary Completion

March 5, 2021

Study Completion

September 5, 2021

Last Updated

November 21, 2024

Results First Posted

November 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2022-05

Locations