Early Initiation of a Strength Training Based Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spine Fusion Improves Core Muscle Strength
1 other identifier
interventional
27
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To analyze safety and the effects of early initiation of the rehabilitation. Including the objective measurement outcomes after lumbar spine fusion, based on the principles of strength training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2017
CompletedNovember 24, 2017
November 1, 2017
2.6 years
November 12, 2017
November 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change of isometric trunk muscle strength
The isometric trunk muscle extension, flexion and lateral flexion strength were measured using a strain-gauge dynamometer. Maximum torque was calculated from the force sensor data (Newton) and the lever as a distance between the middle line of the belt and the iliac crest level (meter). A higher values represent a better outcome. The scale range were 48 Nm -830 Nm for extension, 12 Nm - 1010 Nm for flexion, 35 Nm - 680 Nm for lateral flexion right and 16 Nm - 640 Nm for lateral flexion left.
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Change of low back pain disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index
Self-reported levels of low back pain disability. The Oswestry Disability Index is presented as a score from 0 to 100 where lower scores represent lower levels of low back pain disability.
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change of walking distance as measured by the 6-min walking test
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Change the repetition of stand-ups during the Chair stand test.
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Change of height as measured by the Standing reach height test.
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Change of Intra-abdominal pressure pre-activation pattern.
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Change of pain disability as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale.
Baseline, 9 weeks and 18 months.
Study Arms (2)
The training group
EXPERIMENTALThe training group performed rehabilitation program twice per week over 9 weeks. The group commenced rehabilitation 3 weeks after the surgery. During the phase one training (week 1 to week 5), the isometric exercises were preformed on the trunk extension, flexion and lateral flexion muscles. During the phase 2 (week 6 to week 9), the exercises were performed on the strength machines and duration of the exercises were maintained and prolonged to 30 seconds. The leg adduction and hip extension exercises were added. The patients were instructed to perform abdominal bracing (IAP) and maintain the neutral position of their lumbar spine before and during the exercises.
The control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group followed the hospital's standard protocol. These do not include exercises or physiotherapy before 3 months after surgery.
Interventions
The training group performed rehabilitation program twice per week over 9 weeks. The group commenced rehabilitation 3 weeks after the surgery. During the phase one training (week 1 to week 5), the isometric exercises were preformed on the trunk extension, flexion and lateral flexion muscles. During the phase 2 (week 6 to week 9), the exercises were performed on the strength machines and duration of the exercises were maintained and prolonged to 30 seconds. The leg adduction and hip extension exercises were added. The patients were instructed to perform abdominal bracing (IAP) and maintain the neutral position of their lumbar spine before and during the exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary diagnosis of degenerative, low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis or degenerative disc disease with or without spinal stenosis.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous lumbar fusion surgery, degenerative or idiopathic scoliosis, inflammatory disease, and history of malignancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dejan Kernclead
- University Medical Centre Ljubljanacollaborator
- University of Ljubljanacollaborator
- Slovenian Research Agencycollaborator
Related Publications (12)
Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bunger CE. Importance of the back-cafe concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2561-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000097890.96524.A1.
PMID: 14652472BACKGROUNDNielsen PR, Jorgensen LD, Dahl B, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H. Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Feb;24(2):137-48. doi: 10.1177/0269215509347432.
PMID: 20103575BACKGROUNDGreenwood J, McGregor A, Jones F, Mullane J, Hurley M. Rehabilitation Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):E28-36. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001132.
PMID: 26555833BACKGROUNDOestergaard LG, Nielsen CV, Bunger CE, Svidt K, Christensen FB. The effect of timing of rehabilitation on physical performance after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study. Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1884-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2717-5. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
PMID: 23563500BACKGROUNDOestergaard LG, Christensen FB, Nielsen CV, Bunger CE, Fruensgaard S, Sogaard R. Early versus late initiation of rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):1979-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7902c.
PMID: 23928716BACKGROUNDWeinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2257-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070302.
PMID: 17538085BACKGROUNDDeyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1441-5; discussion 1446-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a.
PMID: 15959375BACKGROUNDCholewicki J, Juluru K, McGill SM. Intra-abdominal pressure mechanism for stabilizing the lumbar spine. J Biomech. 1999 Jan;32(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00129-8.
PMID: 10050947BACKGROUNDHodges PW, Cresswell AG, Daggfeldt K, Thorstensson A. In vivo measurement of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure on the human spine. J Biomech. 2001 Mar;34(3):347-53. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00206-2.
PMID: 11182126BACKGROUNDOestergaard LG, Nielsen CV, Bunger CE, Sogaard R, Fruensgaard S, Helmig P, Christensen FB. The effect of early initiation of rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 1;37(21):1803-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825a17ab.
PMID: 22565381BACKGROUNDAbbott AD, Tyni-Lenne R, Hedlund R. Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):848-57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1049f.
PMID: 20354468BACKGROUNDKernc D, Strojnik V, Vengust R. Early initiation of a strength training based rehabilitation after lumbar spine fusion improves core muscle strength: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 19;13(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0853-7.
PMID: 29914580DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rok Vengust, Phd
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2017
First Posted
November 21, 2017
Study Start
April 4, 2014
Primary Completion
November 25, 2016
Study Completion
September 15, 2017
Last Updated
November 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11