Study Stopped
Lack of recruitment.
Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions
A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia With Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.Protocol Title - A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study
- 2.Purpose of the Study - This prospective randomized study will enroll 200 patients undergoing elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion at Duke University Hospital. The primary objective is to determine the effect of epidural analgesia, as compared with standard care, on post-operative analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 11, 2016
CompletedFebruary 23, 2017
January 1, 2017
1.9 years
January 3, 2013
September 23, 2016
January 10, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative Pain as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.
Postoperative day 1
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Post-operative Day 1
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
6-Week Follow up Visit
Patient Satisfaction With Overall Care
6-Week Follow up Visit
Number of Participants With Events of Special Interest
Post-operative Day 30
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to the Study
6-week Follow up Visit
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intravenous opioids
EXPERIMENTALThis is the standard of care method for post-operative analgesia following lumbar spine fusion surgery. Participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) with dilaudid (or other opioid) for post-operative pain control.
Epidural Catheter
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention to be tested in this study against standard intravenous opioids is infusion of local anesthetic and dilaudid via epidural catheter for post-operative pain control in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.
Interventions
Placement of an epidural catheter to administer local anesthetic and opioid (dilaudid) to the epidural space will be studied as compared to use of intravenous opioid (dilaudid) for pain control following lumbar spine fusion surgery.
Patients in this arm will receive intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia (Dilaudid).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients who are scheduled for elective Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Baseline cognitive deficits sufficient to make objective pain self-assessments unreliable in the estimation of the Study Investigators.
- Inability to follow directions or comprehend the English language.
- Females who are pregnant as determined by positive pregnancy test on or before the day of surgery.
- Prisoners.
- Patient refusal to provide informed consent.
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (7)
Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
PMID: 14612482BACKGROUNDAbrishamkar S, Eshraghi N, Feizi A, Talakoub R, Rafiei A, Rahmani P. Analgesic effects of ketamine infusion on postoperative pain after fusion and instrumentation of the lumbar spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Med Arh. 2012;66(2):107-10. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.107-110.
PMID: 22486142BACKGROUNDSekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, Reddy S, Shetty TA, Pithwa YK. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.009.
PMID: 15125846BACKGROUNDCohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, Miller JS, Gilbert R, Chapman TM. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 15;22(16):1892-6; discussion 1896-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199708150-00016.
PMID: 9280026BACKGROUNDSucato DJ, Duey-Holtz A, Elerson E, Safavi F. Postoperative analgesia following surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):211-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150832.53604.64.
PMID: 15644759BACKGROUNDYukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Terashima T, Horie Y. A prospective randomized study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenac sodium. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2357-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184377.31427.fa.
PMID: 16261108BACKGROUNDParker SL, Lerner J, McGirt MJ. Effect of minimally invasive technique on return to work and narcotic use following transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion: a review. Prof Case Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct;17(5):229-35. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3182529c05.
PMID: 22850657BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Enrollment was terminated when co-PI/coordinator left Duke. No surgical collaborators would enroll subjects. Low enrollment of the study significantly affected the analysis, as both study arms were expected to have 100 participants each.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Erin Manning
- Organization
- Duke University Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erin L Manning, MD/PhD
Duke University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Bagley, MD
Duke University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2013
First Posted
November 19, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 23, 2017
Results First Posted
November 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-01