Safety of Sugammadex for the Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 3 or 4 Participants (MK-8616-145)
A Phase 4 Randomized, Active-Comparator Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety of Sugammadex (MK-8616) for the Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade Induced by Either Rocuronium Bromide or Vecuronium Bromide in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 3 or 4 Subjects
3 other identifiers
interventional
344
4 countries
30
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by neuromuscular blockade agents (NMBA) rocuronium or vecuronium in adult American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class 3 and 4 participants. The primary objectives of the study are to characterize the incidence of treatment emergent sinus bradycardia, treatment emergent sinus tachycardia, or other treatment emergent cardiac arrhythmias after administration of sugammadex and to evaluate the general safety of sugammadex in a population of ASA Class 3 and 4 participants in a surgical setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2017
30 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 4, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 8, 2020
CompletedOctober 8, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.7 years
November 15, 2017
August 24, 2020
October 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sinus Bradycardia Events
The percentage of participants experiencing treatment-emergent sinus bradycardia events was identified with continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Treatment-emergent sinus bradycardia were defined as a heart rate \<60 bpm that has also decreased more than 20% compared to participant baseline heart rate value, sustained for at least 1 minute after administration of study intervention. Treatment-emergent sinus bradycardia events may or may not have been considered an adverse event (AE), as determined by investigator judgment.
Up to approximately 35 minutes post-administration
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sinus Tachycardia Events
The percentage of participants experiencing treatment-emergent sinus tachycardia events was identified with continuous ECG monitoring. Treatment-emergent sinus tachycardia is defined as a heart rate ≥100 bpm that has also increased more than 20% compared to participant baseline heart rate value, sustained for at least 1 minute after administration of study intervention. Treatment-emergent sinus tachycardia events may or may not have been considered an AE, as determined by investigator judgment.
Up to approximately 35 minutes post-administration
Percentage of Participants With Other Treatment-Emergent Cardiac Arrhythmia Events
The percentage of participants experiencing other treatment-emergent cardiac arrhythmia events was identified with continuous ECG monitoring. Other treatment-emergent cardiac arrhythmias were defined as new or worsening arrhythmias (e.g., atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia), sustained for at least 1 minute after administration of study intervention. Worsening arrhythmia events may or may not have been considered an AE, as determined by investigator judgment.
Up to approximately 35 minutes post-administration
Percentage of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) Up To 7 Days After Administration of Study Intervention
As per the protocol primary analysis, the percentage of participants experiencing an AE up to 7 days after administration of study intervention was reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE.
Up to 7 days
Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Up To 7 Days After Administration of Study Intervention
As per the protocol primary analysis, the percentage of participants experiencing an SAE up to 7 days after administration of study intervention was reported. An SAE was an adverse event that: resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly or birth defect; was an other important medical event, was a cancer; or was associated with an overdose.
Up to 7 days
Percentage of Participants Experiencing an Event of Clinical Interest (ECI) Up To 7 Days After Administration of Study Intervention
As per the protocol primary analysis, the percentage of participants experiencing an ECI up to 7 days after administration of study intervention was reported. ECIs were a discrete set of both AEs and SAEs, specifically designated as such for the trial. For the purposes of this investigation, ECIs included 1) drug-induced liver injury; 2) clinically-relevant arrhythmias, inclusive of bradycardia and tachycardia defined as events necessitating intervention, as determined by investigator judgment; and 3) instances of hypersensitivity and/or anaphylaxis adjudicated by an external expert Adjudication Committee. A participant could have experienced more than one type of ECI.
Up to 7 days
Study Arms (4)
Sugammadex 2 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSugammadex 2 mg/kg administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose
Sugammadex 4 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSugammadex 4 mg/kg administered as a single IV dose
Sugammadex 16 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSugammadex 16 mg/kg administered as a single IV dose
Neostigmine + Glycopyrrolate
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeostigmine 50 μg/kg (up to 5 mg maximum dose) plus glycopyrrolate 10 μg/kg (up to 1 mg maximum dose) administered as a single IV dose
Interventions
Following administration of NMBA (Rocuronium or Vecuronium) to achieve moderate NMB, participants received a single i.v. bolus of Sugammadex 2 mg/kg for reversal of moderate NMB. Moderate block is a level of NMB in which peripheral nerve stimulation elicits one to four muscle twitches.
Following administration of NMBA (Rocuronium or Vecuronium) to achieve deep NMB, participants received a single i.v. bolus of Sugammadex 4 mg/kg for reversal of deep NMB. Deep block is a level of NMB in which peripheral nerve stimulation elicits no muscle twitches and high-frequency muscle stimulation elicits minimal levels of muscle contraction.
Following administration of NMBA (Rocuronium) to achieve deep NMB, participants received a single i.v. bolus of Sugammadex 16 mg/kg for reversal of deep NMB. Deep block is a level of NMB in which peripheral nerve stimulation elicits no muscle twitches and high-frequency muscle stimulation elicits minimal levels of muscle contraction.
Following administration of NMBA (Rocuronium or Vecuronium) to achieve moderate NMB, participants received a single i.v. bolus of Neostigmine (50 μg/kg; 5 mg maximum) and Glycopyrrolate (10 μg/kg; 1 mg maximum) for reversal of moderate NMB. Moderate block is a level of NMB in which peripheral nerve stimulation elicits one to four muscle twitches.
To achieve NMB, participants received steroidal NMBA Rocuronium Bromide administered via IV infusion and dosed according to participant body weight. NMBAs were concomitant medications used per label and at Investigator's discretion as an adjunct to general anesthesia.
To achieve NMB, participants received steroidal NMBA Vecuronium Bromide administered via IV infusion and dosed according to participant body weight. NMBAs were concomitant medications used per label and at Investigator's discretion as an adjunct to general anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has a body mass index (BMI) \< 40 kg/m2.
- Is categorized as ASA Physical Status Class 3 or 4, as determined by the Investigator.
- Has a planned surgical procedure that requires NMB with either rocuronium or vecuronium.
- Has a planned surgical procedure (e.g., gastrointestinal, urologic, or laparoscopic) that in the opinion of the investigator does not preclude maintenance of moderate or deep depth of NMB throughout the case.
- If female who is not of reproductive potential, is one of the following: (1) postmenopausal; (2) has had a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation/occlusion at least 6 weeks prior to screening; (3) has a congenital or acquired condition that prevents childbearing; or (4) is undergoing surgical sterilization (e.g., hysterectomy or tubal ligation) as the planned surgical procedure associated with participation in this study.
- If female who is sexually active and of child-bearing potential, agrees to use a medically accepted method of contraception through seven days after receiving protocol-specified medication. Abstinence (relative to heterosexual activity) can be used as the sole method of contraception if it is consistently employed as the subject's preferred and usual lifestyle and if considered acceptable by local regulatory agencies and Ethics Review Committees/Institutional Review Boards.
- Is able to provide (or the participant's legally authorized representative, in accordance with local requirements), written informed consent for the trial. The participant or legally authorized representative may also provide consent for Future Biomedical Research.
You may not qualify if:
- Has a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator that precludes the assessment of bradycardia or arrhythmias.
- Has a medical condition or surgical procedure that precludes reversal of neuromuscular block at the end of surgery.
- Has a neuromuscular disorder(s) that may affect neuromuscular block and/or trial assessments.
- Is dialysis-dependent or has severe renal insufficiency, defined as estimated creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/min.
- Has or is suspected of having a personal history or family history (parents, grandparents, or siblings) of malignant hyperthermia.
- Has or is suspected of having an allergy (e.g., hypersensitivity and/or anaphylactic reaction) to study treatments or its/their excipients, to opioids/opiates, muscle relaxants or their excipients, or other medication(s) used during general anesthesia.
- Has received or is planned to receive toremifene within 24 hours before or within 24 hours after study medication administration.
- Has any condition that would contraindicate the administration of study medication.
- Is pregnant, is attempting to become pregnant, or is lactating.
- Is currently participating in or has participated in an interventional clinical trial (including any other current or ongoing trial with a sugammadex treatment arm) with an investigational compound or device within 30 days of signing the informed consent form of this current trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (30)
University of Alabama - Birmingham ( Site 1046)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
University Banner Medical Center ( Site 1019)
Tucson, Arizona, 85719, United States
Loma Linda University Medical Center ( Site 1029)
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
University of California Davis Medical Center ( Site 1001)
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Jackson Memorial Hospital ( Site 1007)
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center ( Site 1050)
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Tulane University ( Site 1057)
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Ochsner Clinic Foundation ( Site 1005)
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
Brigham & Women's Hospital ( Site 1039)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak ( Site 1034)
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
University Hospital- Columbia MO ( Site 1060)
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
University of Missouri Health Care ( Site 1022)
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
Jersey Shore University Medical Center ( Site 1058)
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States
Saint Peter's University Hospital [New Brunswick, NJ] ( Site 1017)
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
Mission Hospital - Memorial ( Site 1016)
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States
Cleveland Clin Foundation ( Site 1032)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Temple University Hospital ( Site 1004)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140-5103, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center ( Site 1033)
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Hermann Drive Surgical Center ( Site 1021)
Houston, Texas, 77004, United States
Zablocki VA Medical Center ( Site 1011)
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295, United States
A.O. Krankenhaus Dornbirn ( Site 1151)
Dornbirn, Voralberg, 6850, Austria
Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch ( Site 1152)
Feldkirch, 6800, Austria
Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Ost - Donauspital ( Site 1150)
Vienna, 1220, Austria
Aarhus Universitets hospital ( Site 1252)
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
Rigshospitalet ( Site 1253)
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Bispebjerg og Frederiksberg Hospital ( Site 1250)
Copenhagen NV, 2400, Denmark
Regionshospitalet Viborg ( Site 1254)
Viborg, 8800, Denmark
Klinikum Rechts der Isar Technische Universitaet Muenchen ( Site 1350)
München, 81675, Germany
Klinikum am Steinenberg Reutlingen ( Site 1352)
Reutlingen, 72764, Germany
Josephs-Hospitals Warendorf ( Site 1351)
Warendorf, 48231, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Herring WJ, Mukai Y, Wang A, Lutkiewicz J, Lombard JF, Lin L, Watkins M, Broussard DM, Blobner M. A randomized trial evaluating the safety profile of sugammadex in high surgical risk ASA physical class 3 or 4 participants. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Oct 28;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01477-5.
PMID: 34711192DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2017
First Posted
November 17, 2017
Study Start
December 20, 2017
Primary Completion
September 4, 2019
Study Completion
September 4, 2019
Last Updated
October 8, 2020
Results First Posted
October 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf