Sugammadex vs Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate on Urinary Retention After Spine Surgery
A Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Compare Rocuronium Reversal With Sugammadex (Bridion®) Versus Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate and the Incidence of Urinary Retention After Elective Ambulatory Posterior Lumbar Laminectomy
2 other identifiers
interventional
118
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an active-comparator controlled study to evaluate the effect of sugammadex compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for reversal of rocuronium on the incidence of urinary retention after subjects undergo elective ambulatory spine surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2023
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2026
CompletedMay 5, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.5 years
April 25, 2023
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of urinary retention
The difference between sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate on the incidence of urinary retention defined as no void more than 6 hours after posterior lumbar spine surgery in ambulatory/short stay patients.
Up to 6 hours after administration of study intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Micturition
Up to 1 day after administration of study intervention
Bladder urine volume
Up to 6 hours after administration of study intervention
Urinary retention symptoms
Up to 1 day after administration of study intervention
Bladder catheterization
Up to 1 Day after administration of study intervention
Length of hospital stay
Up to 7 Days after administration of study intervention
Study Arms (2)
Sugammadex 2 mg/kg
EXPERIMENTALSugammadex 2 mg/kg administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose.
Neostigmine + Glycopyrrolate
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeostigmine 50 μg/kg (up to 5 mg maximum dose) plus glycopyrrolate 10 μg/kg (up to 1 mg maximum dose) administered as a single IV dose.
Interventions
Sugammadex will be used to reverse rocuronium neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.
Neostigmine will be used to reverse rocuronium NMB. Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.
Glycopyrrolate will be co-administered with neostigmine during reversal of rocuronium NMB. Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.
To achieve NMB, participants will receive the steroidal neuromuscular blocking agent Rocuronium Bromide administered via IV infusion and dosed according to participant actual body weight. It will be used per label to maintain muscle relaxation as an adjunct to general anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- ASA Physical Status I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to obtain written informed consent
- Allergy to medications used in the protocol
- Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders
- Significant renal disease with a serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL
- Significant liver disease
- A family history of malignant hyperthermia
- History of genitourinary surgery, cancer, or radiation within the last year
- Currently prescribed urological medications or diuretics
- BPH or symptoms of BPH (interrupted or weak urine stream or wake up to urinate more than two times per night)
- History or diagnosis of urinary incontinence or urinary retention
- History of PONV with use of scopolamine
- Use of Foley catheter pre- or intra- operatively
- Perioperative medications that influence micturition (e.g., diuretics or intraoperative anticholinergic medication use other than NMB reversal)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Missouri-Columbialead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
Related Publications (6)
Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1139-57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea.
PMID: 19352147BACKGROUNDMcLain RF, Kalfas I, Bell GR, Tetzlaff JE, Yoon HJ, Rana M. Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Jan;2(1):17-22. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.1.0017.
PMID: 15658121BACKGROUNDChang Y, Chi KY, Tai TW, Cheng YS, Lee PH, Huang CC, Lee JS. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1802-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.
PMID: 34015508BACKGROUNDCremins M, Vellanky S, McCann G, Mancini M, Sanzari L, Yannopoulos A. Considering healthcare value and associated risk factors with postoperative urinary retention after elective laminectomy. Spine J. 2020 May;20(5):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
PMID: 32006710BACKGROUNDCha JE, Park SW, Choi YI, et al. Sugammadex use can decrease the incidence of post-operative urinary retention by avoiding anticholinergics: a retrospective study. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018;13(1):40-46.
BACKGROUNDZakaria HM, Lipphardt M, Bazydlo M, Xiao S, Schultz L, Chedid M, Abdulhak M, Schwalb JM, Nerenz D, Easton R, Chang V; MSSIC Investigators. The Preoperative Risks and Two-Year Sequelae of Postoperative Urinary Retention: Analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC). World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e619-e626. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.107. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
PMID: 31568914BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Boris Mraovic, MD, FASA
University of Missouri-Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2023
First Posted
June 2, 2023
Study Start
August 3, 2023
Primary Completion
January 15, 2026
Study Completion
January 15, 2026
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share