NCT03329482

Brief Summary

Back pain is one of humanity most frequent complains. About nine of ten adults experience back pain at some points in their life and five out of ten working adults have back pain every year. When continued for long period it may constitute a disability which tries the patient of the most stoical individual as well as the doctor called to bring relief to the suffering victim. Kneading massage with topical analgesic is a common practice by physiotherapist especially in Nigeria in the management of low back pain, work has been done to know the efficacy of lofnac gel (topical analgesic) via phonophoresis in the management of low back pain(ojoawo,2015), but the comparison of the efficacy of kneading massage and phonophoresis in the management of low back pain has not been well documented. The purpose of this study therefore, is to compare the efficacy of kneading massage and phonophoresis using lofnac gel in the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 12, 2016

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 30, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2017

Status Verified

November 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

October 30, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 3, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Ultrasoundkneading-massagelow back painpain intensitydisability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The verbal rating scale

    The verbal rating scale is a 10-point rating scale that measures present pain intensity of patients. The scale started from 0 and ends with 10. 0 indicate no pain, 1 indicate minimal pain while 5 indicates moderate pain and 10 indicates the most difficult pain called excruciating pain

    6 Weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Pulse Ultrasound Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

This is the Pulse Ultrasound group. Twenty five patients will be in this group.

Other: PULSE ULTRASOUND

Kneading Massage Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

This is kneading massage group . Also 25 patients will be in this group.

Other: KNEADING MASSAGE

Interventions

For group A, The PUS group received pulse mode of ultrasound (sonoplus 490s), with frequency of 1MHZ and intensity of 1.5w/cm according to Ebadi et al 10). Grey's formula was used to estimate the duration of ultrasound (US) for each patient 21). The average local exposure time was one minute and the effective radiating area of the transducer head was 5 cm2. For a patient with an area of low back pain of 40 cm2, the required total treatment time was: 1 min × (40 cm2/5 cm2) = 8 minutes. US was applied using slow circular movements, with the transducer head placed over the painful paravertebral low back region and Lofnac gel used as coupling medium.

Also known as: ULTRASOUND
Pulse Ultrasound Group A

Kneading massage was done with the two hands maintaining a slow circular compression of soft tissues against underlying bone. Pressure was applied as the hands moved proximally, continuously maintaining a contact with the skin, according to Goat22). Lofnac gel was used as a coupling medium for the massage. This was done for an approximately ten and 12 minutes.

Also known as: MASSAGE
Kneading Massage Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with mechanical low back pain who have had pain for more than three months were eligible for the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with nerve roots symptoms, underlying systemic or viscera disease and specific condition such as neoplasm, fracture, ankylosing spondylolytis, previous low back surgery and pregnancy were excluded

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Obafemi Awolowo University

Ile-Ife, Osun State, 220005, Nigeria

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Ebadi S, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Jalaei S, Sadat M, Bagheri H, Vantulder MW, Henschke N, Fallah E. The effect of continuous ultrasound on chronic non-specific low back pain: a single blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Oct 2;13:192. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-192.

    PMID: 23031570BACKGROUND
  • Goats GC. Massage--the scientific basis of an ancient art: Part 1. The techniques. Br J Sports Med. 1994 Sep;28(3):149-52. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.28.3.149.

    PMID: 8000809BACKGROUND
  • Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.

    PMID: 16000093BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back PainPain

Interventions

High-Energy Shock WavesMassage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic WavesSoundRadiation, NonionizingRadiationPhysical PhenomenaTherapy, Soft TissueMusculoskeletal ManipulationsComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
One of the Physiotherapist who carried out the assessment especially when the intervention started did not aware of the study
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A total number of 50 subjects were enrolled for the study: 25 subjects for the PUS group and 25 subjects for the KM group in order to give room for attrition. For the purpose of the study the following instruments were used: verbal-rating scale, Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, and an ultrasound machine
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2017

First Posted

November 6, 2017

Study Start

August 12, 2016

Primary Completion

April 15, 2017

Study Completion

April 15, 2017

Last Updated

November 7, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The study is planned to be published in a reputable journal. The raw data will be kept in the achieve of theUniversity

Locations