Esthetic and Radiographic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement With Thin or Dehiscence Buccal Bone Wall
Esthetic, Clinical and Patient-centered Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement With Thin or Dehiscence Buccal Bone Wall in the Anterior Maxilla
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the soft and hard tissue changes of immediate implant placement with buccal bone augmentation in sites with thin labial bone wall in the anterior maxillary zone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2027
February 9, 2021
February 1, 2021
10.5 years
September 14, 2017
February 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic bone volume
Radiographic bone volume be assessed at pre-operation, 0 ,0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
Up to 10 years after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change of Pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES)
Change from baseline up to 10 years after implantation
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Up to 10 years after baseline
Oral health impact profile shortened version (OHIP-I)
Up to 10 years after baseline
Buccal marginal recession
Up to 10 years after baseline
Papilla volume
Up to 10 years after baseline
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
thin or dehiscences buccal plate
EXPERIMENTALImmediate implant placement used bone augmentation in combination with an absorbable collagen membrane with thin or dehiscences buccal plate.
Interventions
Subjects in need of one implant replacing tooth to be removed in the maxilla within region 13-23 are included. At least 15 patients are recruited.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 70-year-old;
- Stable periodontal and systemic health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I or II);
- Single maxillary anterior teeth (canine to canine);
- Bone thickness less than 1mm at 4mm apical to cementum-enamel junction (CEJ-4);
- Presence of adjacent nature tooth;
- Good compliance;
- No palatal vertical bone loss;
- Good oral hygiene.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled periodontal or systemic disease;
- General psychiatric contraindications;
- More than 20 cigarettes per day;
- History of head and neck radiotherapy;
- Pregnant or expecting to be pregnant;
- Patients with local or generalized healing limitations;
- Bruxism or other destructive parafunctional habits;
- Drug abuse or alcohol abuse.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guanghua School of Stomatology,Hospital of Stomatology,Sun Yat-Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Related Publications (3)
Sarnachiaro GO, Chu SJ, Sarnachiaro E, Gotta SL, Tarnow DP. Immediate Implant Placement into Extraction Sockets with Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects: A Clinical Case Series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Aug;18(4):821-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12347. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
PMID: 25916859RESULTBarone A, Ricci M, Romanos GE, Tonelli P, Alfonsi F, Covani U. Buccal bone deficiency in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective single cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):823-30. doi: 10.1111/clr.12369. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
PMID: 24684275RESULTAloy-Prosper A, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Dental implants with versus without peri-implant bone defects treated with guided bone regeneration. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Jul 1;7(3):e361-8. doi: 10.4317/jced.52292. eCollection 2015 Jul.
PMID: 26330931RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Baoxin Huang, PhD
Sun Yat-sen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2017
First Posted
October 24, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02