A Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC
A RCT Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To observe and compare the short-term and long-term oncological outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedOctober 18, 2017
October 1, 2017
5 years
October 5, 2017
October 13, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival rate
follow-up after the surgery every 3 months, to understand statistics 5-year survival.
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
intraoperative parameters
during the operation
Other Outcomes (1)
postoperative complications
Duration hospitalization(an expected average of 7 days)
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
EXPERIMENTALImprovements in laparoscopic technology mean that LH now has superior short-term efficacy and similar long-term efficacy to open surgery , and LH has shown significant advantages in applications involving recurrent HCC.
Radiofrequency Ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORWith recent technological advances, RFA has become the most widely investigated new first-line therapeutic option for recurrent HCCs . Numerous large studies have demonstrated the advantages of RFA, which include its ease of use, safety, effectiveness, minimal invasiveness, and minimal morbidity and mortality .
Interventions
180 patients with recurrent HCC with recurrent nodular diameters of less than 5 cm and up to three nodules were randomly divided into LH (n=90) and RFA groups (n=90). Outcomes were monitored and evaluated during the 5-year follow-up period.
180 patients with recurrent HCC with recurrent nodular diameters of less than 5 cm and up to three nodules were randomly divided into LH (n=90) and RFA groups (n=90). Outcomes were monitored and evaluated during the 5-year follow-up period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any gender,18 to 70 years old;
- Preoperative diagnosis of recurrent HCC clear,liver resection was done previously;
- No active hepatitis and decompensated cirrhosis;
- Patient with previous liver resection, maximum diameter ≤5cm single recurrent nodules or 3 nodules in diameter and no more than 3cm,did not infringe the portal vein,hepatic vein and inferior vena cava invasion,lymph node or extrahepatic turn;
- No tumor rupture or bleeding;
- Child-Pugh class A or B grade,ICG-R15 \<20%;
- No coagulation disorders,platelet count \> 50 × 109 / L and prolonged prothrombin time \< 5 seconds;
- After diagnosis of recurrent HCC,not be including related surgery,radiofrequency ablation (RFA),TACE treatment,no certainty anticancer chemotherapy treatment;supreme absolute contraindications abdominal surgery;
- Recurrent nodules are not close to intestines,stomach,cholecyst or diaphragm muscle, not close to the first porta hepatis,main vessel and biliary ducts;
- Patients generally available,heart and lung function can tolerate surgery, abdominal surgery supreme absolute contraindications;
- Voluntarily participate in the study, voluntarily accept any therapy of two,informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe upper abdominal adhesions;
- Postoperative pathological examination of the bile duct cell or mixed cell carcinoma and pathologically confirmed positive margin;
- Foreign,Hong Kong,Macao,Taiwan and other regions,estimated postoperative difficult to track,followed up;
- Nodules proved to be not recurrent HCC during intraoperative exploration, such as:liver metastases of colorectal cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Southwest Hospital
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400038, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Shuguo Zheng
Shuguo Zheng, MD Study Director Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery ,Southwest Hospital ,Third Military Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2017
First Posted
October 18, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10