Sensor Validation Study - Quality Assurance
A Quality Assurance Study of Respiratory Rate Measurements on Obese Patients With a Novel Monitoring Technology
1 other identifier
observational
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The respiratory rate is an important parameter in clinical medicine. It is defined as the number of breaths per minute. Currently this is measured at the bedside in clinical practice by counting the breaths, however the gold standard for measuring this vital sign is the capnograph. For the patient, this involves wearing a tube in their nose and around their ears while trying to minimise their movement and talking so that the measurements can be taken. A new respiratory rate monitor, RespiraSense, is non-invasive and measures the respiratory rate by measuring the displacement between the ribs and abdomen. This research study is intended to validate that this technology is effective and accurate on people with a bigger body mass. Subjects with a BMI \> 35 will be invited to participate should they meet all of the eligibility criteria. If patients agree to participate, following informed consent, subjects will be monitored for one hour with both the capnograph and RespiraSense measuring at the same time so their results can be compared
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 7, 2018
CompletedMarch 20, 2019
March 1, 2019
1 year
September 29, 2017
March 19, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of PMD RespiraSense against capnography in obese patients.
Analysed using a Bland Altman (BA) analysis to measure limits of agreement between both methods. The BA analysis will correct for repeated measures within each subject if required. In addition, a Deming Regression will be performed on the collected data.
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of PMD RespiraSense in obese patients with BMI below 50 and those with BMI of 50 or above.
1 hour
Identification of any accuracy spread patterns as BMI increases.
1 hour
Collection of feedback on device comfort when worn by patients with high BMI.
1 hour
Other Outcomes (1)
Exploratory: To measure RespiraSense device alarm generation and assess the rationale behind these to determine if false alarms and therefore alarm fatigue is occurring
1 hour
Interventions
RespiraSense device will be attached at the same time as the capnograph (gold standard) and both will measure simultaneously for one hour
Eligibility Criteria
Obese patients with a BMI ≥35
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 Years
- Have a BMI ≥35
- For the sub-group analysis at least 5 subjects with a BMI 35-49 and at least 5 BMI \> 50 will be needed
- Are willing to voluntarily sign a statement of informed consent to participate in this investigation
You may not qualify if:
- Allergic to medical grade skin adhesive
- Continuous oral long term steroid use. To be free from oral steroid use this is defined as not using oral steroids in the 4 weeks previous to enrolment
- Patients under the influence of substance abuse (drug or alcohol) that may interfere with their ability to cooperate and comply with the investigation procedures
- Any disorder, including cognitive dysfunction, which would affect the ability to accurately complete questionnaires and freely give full informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- PMD Solutionslead
Study Sites (1)
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, United Kingdom
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorraine Albon
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2017
First Posted
October 11, 2017
Study Start
July 28, 2017
Primary Completion
August 7, 2018
Study Completion
September 7, 2018
Last Updated
March 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share