Respiration Rate V2.0 in a Hospital Setting
Evaluation of Respiration Rate Parameters in a Hospital Population Using a Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System With Respiration Rate Version 2.0
1 other identifier
observational
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to meet the respiration rate accuracy specifications for the study pulse oximeter monitoring system (study device) in a hospitalized volunteer population when compared to established technologies for measuring parameters related to respiration, such as Capnograph Respiration Rate (RR)(CO2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2013
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 23, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 3, 2017
CompletedJuly 17, 2017
June 1, 2017
5 months
April 17, 2013
April 30, 2015
June 19, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Error (ME) +/- 1 Breath Per Minute, RR Sensor
The software calculates respiration rate values via Adult Respiratory Sensor with a mean error of +/- 1 breath per minute relative to a capnography based reference. The Mean Error value estimates the mean difference in simultaneous estimates of respiration rate (the Respiration Rate calculated from the sensor and the Respiration Rate calculated from capnography).
up to 40 minutes of continuous monitoring
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mean Error (ME) +/- 1 Breath Per Minute, Max-N Sensor
up to 40 minutes of continuous monitoring
Study Arms (1)
no treatment
no treatment, prospective observational
Eligibility Criteria
Volunteer subjects from a hospital setting on the general care floor or general surgical care floor
You may qualify if:
- Male or female.
- years or older.
- A patient at the study site on a General Care Floor or General Surgery Care Floor.
- Subject is willing and able to provide written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is younger than 18.
- Subject has severe contact allergies that may cause a reaction to standard adhesive materials found in pulse oximetry sensors, ECG electrodes, respiration monitor electrodes or other medical sensors.
- Subject has an abnormality that may prevent proper application of the device.
- Subject is in atrial fibrillation.
- Subject has a documented history of frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), defined as greater than 3 in 30 seconds or greater than 6 in 60 seconds.
- Subject has an implanted pacemaker.
- Subject is unwilling or unable to sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Luna-Victoria
- Organization
- Medtronic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua Lumbley, MD
Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2013
First Posted
April 23, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 17, 2017
Results First Posted
February 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06