NCT03304184

Brief Summary

The study will compare two different dental materials on dental lesions near the gum line that cause chronic pain on oral health related quality of life.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3 quality-of-life

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2017

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 3, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 9, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 9, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 19, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 3, 2017

Results QC Date

March 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Global Base Changes of Pain

    A one survey description detailing the changes in pain over time based on the following scale: 1. -No change (or condition has gotten worse) 2. -Almost the same, hardly any change at all 3. -A little better, but no noticeable change 4. -Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference 5. -Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change 6. -Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference 7. -A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference

    baseline, week1, week 2, 3 month follow up

  • Oral Health Related Quality of Life Using a Survey With 49 Questions

    A survey of 49 questions to assess oral health related quality of life. The scale measured 49 questions with a yes (1) or no (0) answers with a possible range of 0-49. The more answers of yes will indicate a higher score on the survey, which describes poorer oral health related quality of life. A lower number reflects better oral health related quality of life. A maximum score of 49 is the worst outcome.

    Baseline, week1, week 2, 3 month follow up

  • Brief Pain Inventory

    6 questions were used to measure pain on a sliding scale from 1-100 at each time point. The scale ranged from 1 being no pain and 100 being extreme pain. The higher the number reflects worse the pain compared to a lower number. The maximum range from the participants was 600 (maximum) and the lowest range of 0 for all questions. The data reflects the averaged sum for each time point for all patients in each arm.

    Baseline, week1, week 2, 3 month follow up

Study Arms (2)

Photac-fil

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will have a restoration placed with photac-fil in the lesion near the gum line.

Device: Photac-fil

Biodentine

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have a restoration placed with Biodentine in the lesion near the gum line.

Device: Biodentine

Interventions

Application of a tooth colored filling in a non-cavitated dental lesion.

Also known as: Resin modified glass ionomer
Photac-fil

Application of a white colored filling in a non-cavitated dental lesion.

Biodentine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females age 18-64
  • Chief complaint associated with pain from cold or hot
  • Chronic sensitivity associated with supragingival lesions
  • Pain not associated with decay
  • Fluent in English and able to read English at a 6th grade level
  • Pulpal response \<40 via pulp tester
  • Active salivary flow from palpation of parotid and submandibular glands
  • Patients self reporting pain over 6/10 in the past week and/or the past 2 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Patients taking benzodiazepines, narcotics and multiple antidepressants for pain management not associated with the oral cavity
  • Unexplained dry mouth
  • Patients taking two or more medications associated with dry mouth
  • Pulpal response \>40 via pulp tester
  • Patients requiring treatment for more than 5 decayed sites, periodontal disease and root canal therapy
  • Complicated medical history (\>4 concurrent treatment for systemic diseases)
  • Lesion \>1mm below the gum line

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dental School

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Elizabeth Van Tubergen
Organization
University of Michigan

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: One group will be treated with a tooth colored filling that will be placed near the gum line. The second group will be treated with a white colored filling that will be placed near the gum line.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2017

First Posted

October 6, 2017

Study Start

September 28, 2017

Primary Completion

October 9, 2019

Study Completion

October 9, 2019

Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Results First Posted

July 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations