Impact Of Different Ablation Approaches on Outcome In Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter
APPROVAL
1 other identifier
interventional
86
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective, multi-center, single blinded study aims to compare the influence of two different catheter ablation strategies, on long-term ablation outcome in terms of AF recurrence and quality of life (QoL) in patients presenting with coexistent AF and AFL. The two strategies to be evaluated are 1) the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) with or without flutter (AFL) ablation (AF ± AFL) versus 2) AFL ablation alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 19, 2017
October 1, 2017
1.8 years
September 21, 2011
October 17, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence of atrial arrhythmia
Any episode of AF/AT longer than 30 sec will be considered as a recurrence. Episodes that occur during the first 3 months after the procedure (blanking period) will not be considered as recurrence.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in QoL score from baseline
12 months
Study Arms (2)
AF ablation with or without AFL ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI)with or without cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation
AFL ablation only
ACTIVE COMPARATORCavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation only
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: ≥ 18years
- Patients presenting with paroxysmal AF and typical AFL
- Ability to provide written, informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Reversible causes of atrial arrhythmia such as hyperthyroidism, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, sarcoidosis and excessive alcohol consumption
- Bleeding disorder
- Contra-indication to anti-coagulants
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundationlead
- Monzino Hospital, Milan, Italycollaborator
- Ospedale dell'Angelo, Venezia-Mestrecollaborator
- Catholic University, Italycollaborator
- University of Rome Tor Vergatacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Related Publications (2)
References: Symptomatic improvement after radiofrequency catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter; Heart 2001;86:167-171 Quality-of-Life in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation: Results of Long-Term Follow-Up; PACE 2003; 26:678-684 Quality of life restored to normal in patients with atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ostial Isolation; Am Heart J 2004;148:318-25 Effect of Left Atrial Ablation on the Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation; Circ J 2008; 72: 582-587 Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Congestive Heart Failure; N Engl J Med 2004;351:2373-83. Effects of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation on Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Flutter; Am J Cardiol 1999;84:278-283 Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Common Atrial Flutter : Significance of Palpitations and Quality-of-Life Evaluation in Patients With Proven Isthmus Block; Circulation 1999;99;534-540 Relationship Between Atrial Fibrillation and Typical Atrial Flutter in Humans; Circulation. 1997;96:3484-3491 Combining ablation of atrial fibrillation with ablation of atrial flutter: Are we there yet? JACC, Vol 43, No. 11, 2004 Factors predicting recurrences of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter; Seminars in Cardiology, 2003, vol. 9, No. 3: 55-60 Effectiveness of catheter ablation for coexisting atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter; Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:666-668 Quality of Life in Atrial Fibrillation: Measurement Tools and Impact of Interventions; J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 July ; 19(7): 762-768 Clinical significance of inducible atrial flutter during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 2;43(11):2057-62. Effectiveness of catheter ablation for coexisting atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Sep 1;94(5):666-8.
RESULTMohanty S, Mohanty P, Di Biase L, Bai R, Santangeli P, Casella M, Dello Russo A, Tondo C, Themistoclakis S, Raviele A, Rossillo A, Corrado A, Pelargonio G, Forleo G, Natale A. Results from a single-blind, randomized study comparing the impact of different ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in coexistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (APPROVAL). Circulation. 2013 May 7;127(18):1853-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001855. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
PMID: 23572499DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Natale, MD
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Executive medical director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2011
First Posted
September 23, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10