Assessment of Symptoms and Consequences of Coloanal Continuity Reconstruction
QUALIPRO
Assessment of Symptoms and Their Consequences on Patients Quality of Life After Coloanal Continuity Reconstruction Following a Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, monocentric study whose aim is to assess the quality of life for patients who underwent a coloanal continuity reconstruction and to understand the functional issues they encounter. This will potentially provide predictive factors identification of bad functional outcomes allowing to guide future decisions. Also, it will allow patients to have a reinforced follow-up during the year after the reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 29, 2024
CompletedMarch 17, 2026
March 1, 2026
6.5 years
September 18, 2017
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of life 1 year after the second intervention, using LARS score
Obtain an objective assessment of symptoms intensity (using the LARS score)for patients who received a proctectomy for rectal cancer ("1st intervention") following by a coloanal continuity reconstruction ("2nd intervention")
from baseline to 1 year after the second intervention
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Quality of life before the first intervention and after the second intervention
from baseline to one year after the 2nd intervention
Quality of life using EORTC-QLQ-C30
from baseline to one year after the 2nd intervention
Quality of life using EORTC-QLQ-CR29 questionnaires
from baseline to one year after the 2nd intervention
Impact of stomy on quality of life
from the first intervention to 6 months after the first intervention
Rate of patients with anastomotic fistula
from the first intervention to 6 months after the first intervention
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Study process
EXPERIMENTALPre- and post-operative consultations. Stomatherapy consultation. Questionnaires
Interventions
Clinical exam. At one and six months after the 2nd intervention
* QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 at each time defined by the study (one month before and after the first intervention, before the 2nd intervention and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the 2nd intervention) * Stoma-QoL before and after the 2nd intervention * LARS score at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the 2nd intervention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 70 years old
- Patients who are going to undergo a proctectomy for a rectal cancer (situated at a distance equal or lower to 15 cm from the anoderm) following by a coloanal continuity reconstruction (using direct, latero-terminal or colonic J-pouch anastomosis)
- Already underwent or not a neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy
- Affiliation to the National Social Security System
- With informed and signed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Unwilling patients
- Patient deprived of their liberty or under guardianship or tutorship.
- Abdominal perineal amputation
- No stoma placement planned
- Tumor more than 15 cm from the anal margin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Oscar Lambretlead
- Santelys Associationcollaborator
- Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, 59020, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pascale COULON
Centre Oscar Lambret
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2017
First Posted
September 25, 2017
Study Start
January 18, 2018
Primary Completion
July 29, 2024
Study Completion
July 29, 2024
Last Updated
March 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share