Protective Mechanical VENTilation Strategy in Patients Undergoing CARDiac Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
310
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Heart surgery is a life-saving intervention for hundreds of thousands of patients each year worldwide. Advances in technology and medical expertise have improved outcomes for these patients over the years. However, despite such advances, approximately 30% of patients develop lung complications (also called "pulmonary complications") after heart surgery, which result in prolonged hospital stay, increased mortality and healthcare costs. During and immediately after heart surgery, the patient's breathing needs to be artificially controlled by a breathing machine, called "mechanical ventilator". The medical literature has reported that in critically ill patients the use of specific settings on the breathing machine (so called "protective mechanical ventilation") prevents lung complications and significantly decreases mortality. Studies show that such settings could also be beneficial for patients that undergo several types of planned surgery, however data regarding heart surgery patients (the most vulnerable to lung complications) are lacking.The aim of our study is to test whether the use of protective mechanical ventilation settings during and after heart surgery reduces lung complications compared to the current standard of care. The main innovation of this study is the application of a novel protective mechanical ventilation strategy to patients undergoing cardiac surgery, in order to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2022
CompletedApril 30, 2021
April 1, 2021
4.5 years
September 12, 2017
April 29, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative pulmonary complications
Daily chart review and assessment of any pulmonary complications documented
for 7 days post operatively
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Ventilator free days
Post op day 1-28 days
Intensive care length of stay
Post op day 1-28 days
Hospital length of stay
Post op day 1-28 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Post op day 1-28 days
Ease of surgical access
Intraoperatively during surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects randomized to the intervention group will receive a comprehensive perioperative mechanical ventilation strategy that includes a bundle of protective settings (use of PEEP, recruitment maneuvers and continuation of mechanical ventilation during CPB).
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONSubjects randomized to the control group will receive mechanical ventilation according to the current usual care.
Interventions
1\) Intervention group. * Recruitment maneuvers (doubling the tidal volumes for 10 consecutive breaths) every 30min and after every time mechanical ventilation is stopped for surgical reasons, suctioning occurs or the breathing circuit is disconnected * Mechanical ventilation will be continued during CPB (PEEP 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate 8/min, Tidal Volume 6 ml/kg PBW, FiO2 21% * Avoidance of lung de-recruitment during patient's transfer (use of PEEP via PEEP valves, endotracheal tube clamps during disconnection from the breathing circuit) * Avoidance of disconnection from respiratory circuit during respiratory secretions suctioning (applying closed suction circuits) * For the remaining aspects the mechanical ventilation settings will be the same as in the control group. Tidal volume 6ml/kg PBW PEEP 5cm H20 FiO2 to target SatO2 of 92-97% Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years old
- Scheduled for elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, Single valve repair or replacement, or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft plus Single Valve repair or replacement, with the use of Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB), aortic clamp and cardioplegia, sternotomy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Clinically significant Congenital Heart Disease
- Surgery with planned thoracotomy approach with one lung ventilation
- Body mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 40 or higher,
- Receipt of positive pressure mechanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive) within the 2 weeks preceding surgery (excluding routine treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome)
- Severe chronic respiratory disease, as indicated by any of:
- Baseline FEV1 \< 20 ml/kg predicted body weight
- Pre-existing chronic interstitial lung disease with chronic interstitial infiltration on chest X-ray
- Documented chronic CO2 retention (PaCO2 \> 50 mm Hg) and/or chronic hypoxaemia (PaO2\<55 mmHg on FiO2 = 0.21)
- Chronic restrictive, obstructive, neuromuscular, chest wall or pulmonary vascular disease resulting in severe exercise restriction (e.g., unable to climb stairs or perform household duties), secondary polycythaemia, severe pulmonary hypertension (mean PAP \> 40 mmHg), or ventilator dependency
- Requirement for urgent/emergent surgery
- Progressive neuromuscular illness\* that will result in prolonged need for mechanical ventilation
- Previous randomization in this trial
- Consent refusal
- Surgeon, anesthesiologist, intensivist refusal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matteo Parotto, MD, PhD
Toronto General Hospital, UHN
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Manager Anesthesia Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2017
First Posted
September 20, 2017
Study Start
July 7, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2021
Study Completion
April 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share